Driscoll "has made an educated, informed decision to reject the historic, biblical definition of the relationship between the persons of the Trinity."
Body
Mark Driscoll, the Trinity, and W. G. T. Shedd
Note that Driscoll rejects some important theology regarding the eternal generation of the Son, and the procession of the Spirit from the Father and the Son.
How can Jesus be both the Son of God (John 1:34; 3:36) and God Himself (John 1:1; 20:28)? To the casual reader, this seems implausible. Nonetheless, the Bible is consistent, presenting both as realities. Consequently, both realities are true at the same time or else the Bible is incorrect about one of the most significant issues in its pages. Great are the implications if the Bible is in error on this point.
Discussion