C. H. Spurgeon - Sermon for New Year's Day

Special thanks to The Spurgeon Archive. Spurgeon delivered this message on Thursday evening, January 1, 1885 at the Metropolitan Tabernacle, Newington.

“And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new.”—Revelation 21:5.

Discussion

The Pursuit of Joy

The author of this essay is no longer involved at SI, but it’s too good to let gather digital dust. First appeared at SharperIron on May 2, 2005. The original post and discussion are available here.

Discussion

Apolitical Faith? Objections to Christian Political Engagement, Part 2

Read Part 1.

Should Christians be engaged in the American political process? Should involvement in politics ever go beyond a bit of reading and vote-casting? Do pastors and teachers have an obligation to address political topics? Should churches be involved in any way?

Many doctrinally-serious evangelicals and fundamentalists are now answering all of these questions in the negative. But do their objections to Christian political engagement justify keeping political thought and activity to such a minimum? In Part 1 of this series, I began considering and answering several representative objections to more-than-voting involvement in politics. Here, I’ll evaluate several more objections.

First, some attention to the meaning of “political engagement” may be helpful.

Forms and levels of political engagement

For the purposes of this article, “engagement” occurs in two forms and on many levels. The form of engagement may consist of involvement with the ideas or involvement with the process—or both of these. We are ideologically engaged when we ponder points of political (and social) philosophy that relate to the political issues facing our society and seek to think biblically about them. We are involved in the process whenever we act to influence the choice of leaders or policies, whether the action is writing a letter to the editor of the local paper, calling a legislator, marching in a rally or simply casting a vote.

These forms of engagement also occur on many levels. At the most basic, minimal level, idea engagement means listening to the claims of political figures and considering whether they are true in light of what we already know from Scripture. Engagement at the deepest level might take the form of earning a PhD in political theory or writing a book, working for a think-tank, or touring the country on a lecture series.

Casting a vote is pretty much the minimal level of process engagement. Arguably, putting a bumper sticker on the car is more visible but less influential on the final result of an election or policy decision. Deeper levels of engagement range from passing out campaign literature, to donating, to joining a campaign staff, to holding public office.

Discussion

3 Simple lessons from a trip to Southeast Asia

Well, I’m back from a powerful missions trip. I was given the thrill of being able to teach a variety of leaders, and preach in the context of several ministries, take part in a baptismal service with believers from an underground church, and what a thrill to share the gospel in a variety of settings.

Discussion

"What Do We Do With Homeschoolers"

Apparently Mr. Stein is concerned that school administrators are attempting to improve their graduation rates by classifying drop-outs as homeschoolers and convincing parents of troubled kids to sign papers saying that they are removing their kids to homeschool.

Discussion

7 Questions to Ask When Deciding to Homeschool

In my experience, when parents are asking themselves about whether or not they should homeschool, they tend to focus on which curriculum they would use, or whether or not they think they can teach advanced math or science.

These are not the first questions one should ask. The mechanics of home education are really not all that difficult to navigate. There are enough homeschooling resources and options available that technically any family could homeschool. But home education success doesn’t rise and fall on curriculum choices and learning styles.

Discussion