"[T]his declaration focuses on a number of issues that the writers believe need to be reaffirmed in our current cultural context."
Body
Kevin Bauder, Scott Aniol, Mike Riley, et. al. … New Book—A Conservative Christian Declaration
As iron sharpens iron,
one person sharpens another. (Proverbs 27:17)
Kevin Bauder, Scott Aniol, Mike Riley, et. al. … New Book—A Conservative Christian Declaration
“The theological principles of a dispensational hermeneutic will lead to very different methodologies and goals for the church than a Reformed system will.”
In the early days of fundamentalism, differing views on eschatology and the differences between dispensationalism and covenant theology didn’t seem to hinder fellowship. I know of at least one denomination that purposely takes no position on eschatology and, when last I checked, had a-mills, post-mills, historic pre-mills, and at least one non-dispensational pre-trib, pre-mill all working together.
Reprinted with permission from As I See It, which is available free by writing to the editor at dkutilek@juno.com. Read the series so far.
While accepting the complete OT canon of the Jews, NT-era Christians also recognized additional written works as divinely-inspired and therefore authoritative. As the various Apostolic writings were composed and circulated, their authority was recognized and they began to be read in the churches in addition to the Old Testament Scriptures.
In 1 Timothy, Paul’s “textbook” on “church polity” (see 3:14-15), he instructs Timothy, proseche tei anagnosei, “devote yourself to the reading” (4:13). That this is the public reading of the Scriptures and not simply an exhortation to extensive private study is evident, first, from the presence in Greek of the definite article, “the reading,” that is, something well-known The article is similarly used in the references to the reading of the Scriptures in the synagogue, Acts 13:15; 2 Corinthians 3:14. Second, the two following activities, “the exhortation, the instruction,” are clearly public activities carried out in the assembly. Most commentators seem to understand the reading to be public and in the church, rather than private. Included in this number are Alford,1 Ellicott,2 Fairbairn,3 Van Oosterzee,4 Liddon,5 White,6 Lock,7 Robertson,8 Hendricksen,9 and Earle.10 On the other hand, there are those who understand the verse to mean private study, including Calvin,11 Gill,12 and Barnes13 (Clarke understands it of both public and private reading).14
Reprinted with permission from As I See It, which is available free by writing to the editor at dkutilek@juno.com. Read the series so far.
Inasmuch as Bible instruction was an important function of both the synagogue and the church, it is no surprise to discover that the public reading of the Scriptures was among the regular activities of both. The value, even necessity, of the reading of Scriptures orally in both the synagogue and the church is further recognized when it is pointed out that considerable numbers of individuals in the first century were completely illiterate and could not read the sacred text for themselves at all. Besides this, the high cost of manuscript copies of the Bible made private possession and private reading of the Scriptures well beyond the reach of most individuals.
Read the series so far.
Read the series so far.
If neither Calvinism nor Arminianism is sufficient explanatory devices, then how can we explain the biblical data? A series of biblical assertions is sufficient to accomplish that task.
Christian publishing has especially thrived because of its concentration of both mainline and evangelical colleges and seminaries. Publishers Weekly
Read the series so far.
Discussion