What is your view of the Masoretic text in contrast to the LXX and Dead Sea Scrolls?
Most Old Testament translations rely on the Masoretic Text. Some sometimes modify that text based upon the Dead Sea Scrolls and even the Septuagint. Although I think most of us favor the Masoretic Text (MT), can the other traditions be of textual value?
We know there are many principles involved in Biblical criticism, so we are painting with a broad brush.
There seems to be a renewed movement toward respecting the LXX text as a tradition to be reckoned with.
So, what are your thoughts? Have your views on this subject changed? Comments (brief ones esp.) appreciated.
Discussion