Holding Pastors Accountable
“[T]he Lawson case reveals that the problem was deeper. Steve Lawson was not actually the pastor of the church where he was the lead preacher. He was not an elder at Trinity or even a member of the church!” - P&D
- 123 views
The facts are clear—Steven Lawson and his wife are members of Trinity Bible Church. We have verified this information from two sources within Trinity Bible Church. It is not clear how these rumors began to spread, but like a destructive wildfire, such false accusations need to be stopped.
Source https://g3min.org/statement-regarding-steven-lawson-and-trinity-bible-c…
Why didn't anyone at P & D check with Trinity before publishing? It seems to me that if we are going to hold our brothers and sisters accountable, we owe them the courtesy of checking our facts before we start our criticism.
"Some things are of that nature as to make one's fancy chuckle, while his heart doth ache." John Bunyan
Apart from an apparent mistake by P&D, what does a church do when a pastor does a fireable moral failing? They pretty much fire them, and that pastor generally doesn't show his face there going forward. Side note; Julie Roys did have sources that allege Lawson was not a member. May have gotten it wrong, but there is a source.
But to the point, I'm not quite sure what changes with membership. There is a question of what one does with all the books he's written--I'm guessing the publisher is taking a bath on that!--but beyond that, I think there ought to be some soul searching about how people at TMU (where Lawson worked) and elsewhere missed the signs that something was amiss. Julie Roys' account of the matter does not suggest anything that I'd see as hugely wrong, though an incident where the young lady combed Lawson's hair and straightened his tie was reported. Maybe more comes out that will help us understand what is going on here.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
but beyond that, I think there ought to be some soul searching about how people at TMU (where Lawson worked) and elsewhere missed the signs that something was amiss.
I appreciate the statement about missed signs, but I will tell you from experience that pastors involved in moral turpitude are often masters of concealment. They are exposed only after someone stumbles upon an email, text message, or dm. That is what happened in three of the four cases of pastoral moral failure that I personally witnessed as a church member and elder. In the fourth case, the married youth pastor (in his 40s) was seen being "too friendly" with one of the young, single church secretaries (in her 20s). As a result, the senior pastor asked a man on staff to surveil the youth pastor, and that is how the affair (sorry, the "clergy sexual abuse") was discovered. If someone wants to conceal and lie about a matter, there's not much you can do about it before the fact.
One member of my previous church suggested that all elders should have tracking software installed on their phones so that church members could know where their pastors are at any time of day. Really? Is that reasonable?
Discussion