Book Review - Who Stole My Church?

[amazon 078522601X thumbnail]

[amazon 078522601X]

[amazon 078522601X binding], [amazon 078522601X numberofpages] pages
[amazon 078522601X publisher], [amazon 078522601X publicationyear]
ISBN 10: [amazon 078522601X asin]

I have had an on again-off again relationship with Gordon MacDonald. As a young associate pastor in the mid-eighties I read his best seller, Ordering Your Private World (which is still in print). A couple of years later I read his book, Renewing Your Spiritual Passion. Although it was twenty-five years ago, I vaguely remember spiritually profiting somewhat from those books, although if I were to re-read them now, I might have a different opinion. However, the fact that he has admitted that he was involved in an extra-marital affair while writing those books kind of soured me on him. I did not read his Rebuilding Your Broken World or anything else by him. (That may be more of a reflection upon my former Phariseeism than his restoration.)

Gordon MacDonald has been a pastor and author for more than forty years. He has also been the president of a couple of well-known parachurch organizations, and is currently an editor at large for the magazine Leadership. He and his wife of almost fifty years live in New Hampshire.

This book first caught my eye a couple of years ago when it came out in hardback. I skimmed it a couple times at the bookstore, but didn’t want to pay the hardback price. However, when I eventually saw it in paperback, I plopped down my money. I am glad I did.

The subtitle of this book is “What to Do When the Church You Love Tries to Enter the 21st Century.” It is a fictional tale told in the first person. MacDonald writes as a pastor of an imaginary New England congregation of a few hundred people. The church has had a proud history and is part of an unnamed denomination. The sixty-ish “Pastor MacDonald” has been at the church for several years and has overseen the last of a series of changes designed to attract younger people. Not everyone is on board with these changes—especially the aging “boomer” generation. Plus, there are more changes on the horizon. A proposed $150,000 initiative to upgrade the sanctuary’s technology did not get the expected congregational approval. This has brought the change issues to a head. Also being debated is a proposed name change for the church.

The story revolves around a series of Tuesday evening meetings that Pastor MacDonald has with a group of long-time church members in their fifties and sixties. This group shares a common church experience. They remember the same hymns, the evening services, prophecy conferences and “revivals.” They miss the choir and the organ, even the “singing Christmas tree.” They don’t connect with contemporary Christian music and casual church attire. Deep down, Pastor MacDonald feels their pain.

Each chapter details successive meetings of this group of believers, which Pastor MacDonald has dubbed the “Discovery Group.” Before each chapter, he gives us (“from his notes”) a brief biography sketch of different attendees. Some are retired, some self-employed, some widowed, some married, some well off, some not so much. Although one seemingly turns out to be a non-believer, the others are serious about their faith and honor the scriptures.

I especially enjoyed the group’s discussion of hymns—particularly the hymns of Isaac Watts. Until the change that Isaac Watts eventually brought to the church, congregational singing was confined to singing the psalms. This singing was “in a more-or-less monotone form with no instrumental accompaniment, because instruments in a church were considered worldly” (p. 96). Young Isaac Watts found this style of singing stifling. When he complained to his father (who happened to be the pastor), his father, rather than argue, wisely suggested that Watts write some of his own music. What if his father had responded negatively? What if Watts had taken his talents elsewhere, outside the church? What if he had never written, “When I Survey the Wondrous Cross” or “I Sing the Mighty Power of God”? “What we have in this little story is an example of the way an older generation needs to respond to the younger generation when it’s time for a change” (p. 96). Isaac Watts’ hymns were the contemporary Christian music of the day. “I’m going to guess that, if Isaac Watts were alive today, he’d be among the very first to say, ‘My songs have had a good long shelf life, but now it’s time for some new writers and new music.’ I don’t think he’d see things the way some of us see them” (p. 97).

As Pastor MacDonald gently guides the group into critical thinking about the issues, he is really helping the readers. I couldn’t help but see myself sitting among the group. I have also felt their pain. Though this book is not an in-depth Bible study, the real MacDonald does use the Bible occasionally to bring the light of Scripture to the issues. He also gives several good history lessons. I found both approaches to be beneficial, as did his fictional discovery group.

This is an entertaining book, which makes it a pretty easy read. If you are over fifty and you have been in church most of your life, you ought to read this book. Discussion questions for each chapter are provided at the end of the book. You may not agree with all of the group’s discoveries, but it will help you see the other side of the issue.


Greg Wilson was raised in a Christian home and was led to the Lord at a young age by his father. He has been in full-time Christian ministry since graduating from Midwestern Baptist College (Pontiac, MI) in 1981. He has been married to Sharon for over 26 years and they have two married daughters and a teenage son. He has been the pastor of the Community Bible Church (Palmyra, PA) since 1998.

Discussion

Yeah, I’m generalizing. Probably over-generalizing. The valid part is probably just that there is an important axis along which views about change tend to conflict… the evangelization purpose vs. exaltation purpose axis? But I believe that in the long run, we evangelize better when we exalt better. (Though I can’t say that in my own church experience I’ve seen that in visible results!.. but maybe it’s because we aren’t really “exalting better.”)

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

Hey Aaron, thanks for your response! Sorry that my answer was so lengthy. It’s something that I’ve been pondering for quite some time as a result of reading, “Who Stole My Church” and it’s by and large the conclusion I’ve come to regarding generational transition. I’ve not been able to get back on SI for a response because my wife and I are in the process of moving. I’m in the process of moving and heading back to school to pursue a counseling degree, so my priorities haven’t been on blogging.

Interestingly, the book discusses the difference in perspective from one generation to the other when it talks about music. The people simply didn’t “get” each other’s music (i.e. the older generation’s desire to cling to the older songs and the younger generation’s desire to sing new songs) and so they just lobbed insults at each other. The pastor was able to have them all sit down (which you can tell this was fiction because something like that would be very difficult to do) and have each of them explain their perspective. Both of them came to a mutual understanding, learned why the issue was important to the other, and the church changed as a result to incorporate more of the hymns because the younger generation never knew 1) why they were so important to the older generation, and 2) why they were so theologically sound (they couldn’t get past the music aspect to appreciate the poetic words). Their whole frame of mind was different in approaching the subject which I think you picked up on in your post. Honestly, there are people who can be wrong on both sides of the issue and people who can be right on both sides of the issue - I beleive it’s always wrong when you start from “I prefer” or “I want” rather than the glory of God.

One other thought is that while historically this issue has been wrongly a “seeker sensitive” issue, I think that thought doesn’t completely encompass the scope of the issue and I’ve seen several churches and movements that are coming back to the understanding that music isn’t about evangelism but rather about the believers worshiping their God. But at this point, it’s not just the unsaved people who don’t get hymns or older music, there’s a lot of younger Christians that don’t get them either. As an illustration, when I switched from the KJV to the NKJV the primary reason I did so was because I was taking the “thee’s” and “thou’s” out when I shared the Gospel and the NKJV saved me a lot of headache (I suppose I was being seeker sensitive to the langauge barrier). But then I found that a newer translation wasn’t just helpful for reaching the lost, it was helpful for my own understanding of Scripture and I began to understand passages that had never clicked with me - just because I didn’t get the archaic language. Not that I couldn’t do research and learn it, the KJV just wasn’t my language and didn’t resonate with me. I think you’re seening that dynamic in worship as well in that perhaps contemporary music started out in order to reach the lost, but now Christians have realized that music in their own language and culture has been helpful for their own walks witih God because they understand it and connect with it because it’s in their language both musically and poetically.

I say all that because the “worship war” isn’t just about reaching the lost anymore, but rather a younger generation worshipping God in their own language and culture. Churches who incorporate contemporary music aren’t necessarily doing so to be a seeker sensitive church. They may be doing so because they’re trying to incorporate music that the younger generationof Christians in their church understand and relate to. I think that also applies to the version used at the pulpit, the music, as well as the whole atmosphere of the church. I’m not advocating throwing out all the old traditions here. I’ve got a problem with that not because the traditions should be sacred cows, but because it alienates a whole generation - an older one. The result is that it ends up leaving churches that God has been working in for decades to shrivel up and die with people wondering why they can’t get young people in anymore and other churches where a white head of hair is rare. But give it 40 years, and this current generation doesn’t invest in the next, you’ll see churches like “Mars Hill” and “Northpoint” etc. wondering why they can’t get young people anymore. My contention is that each generation needs to be multilingual and multicultural in their worship, with the younger generation understanding the language and culture of their heritage as well as their own and the older generation reaching into the lives of the younger providing wisdom and balance. It’s a dynamic that not many churches these days are striving to incorporate and I believe it stems in “ME” centered worship on all fronts and results in churches with not a lot of depth.