An Overview of the New Perspective on Paul
Reprinted, with permission, from Faith Pulpit (May/June 2010).
I have had a couple of opportunities to be on camera in front of a “green screen.” The camera captures your image and ignores the green background. It is a great experience because you can project yourself on screen into any number of backgrounds. At one moment you can be skiing in the Alps; the next, you can be surfing on the North Shore. You stay the same, only the background changes. This is the same technology that weather reporters use in their studios to show the weather map.
In an odd kind of way, the green screen illustrates what the New Perspective on Paul is all about. The New Perspective on Paul, however, is not really first and foremost about Paul at all. It is about Paul’s background (i.e., Second Temple Judaism). When you change the background on the green screen from mountains to ocean, people interpret the image in a completely different way. In a similar way, New Perspective scholars are reinterpreting Paul in a variety of different ways because their perception of his background of first-century Judaism has changed.
Discussion
"[Wright] has been enthusiastically calling for the Pope to visit Durham on his forthcoming UK visit. I can guess what John Knox of St Andrews might have made of that."
Body
Discussion
"Both of these conferences—on the surface and in their rhetoric—speak the 'unity language.'"
Body
Discussion
CBTS Makes New Perspective Chapel Series Available
Body
Discussion
N.T. Wrights and Wrongs
Body
Discussion
The New Perspective on Paul: "What Saint Paul Really Said"?
This article appears in the July/August 2006 issue of Frontline Magazine. It appears here with permission of the publisher.
By Albin Huss Jr.
Discussion
Concerning the New Perspective on Paul: FBFI Resolution 06-02
NOTE: The following standing resolution was presented at the 86th Annual Fellowship of the Fundamental Baptist Fellowship International on June 13, 2006, at Hamilton Square Baptist Church in San Francisco, California.
Discussion