Separation

At what point do you say, this church is so far off-base theologically, or even in their practice, that you say to yourself: I’m not going to volunteer to help them, because I don’t want them to prosper unless they get these things corrected?

Obviously, if they teach damnable doctrines.

Discussion

Book Review - The Dictionary of Christian Spirituality

[amazon 031029066X thumbnail]

Within the last ten years or so it has been the habit of publishers to make books in dictionary form that are dedicated to a particular subject, person or idea that has within it a multitude of words, concepts and ideas. Some of these are broad like the Old Testament and others are more specific like Paul. Since many of these dictionaries deal with subjects like hermeneutics, theology or backgrounds they naturally carry with them a more academic feel though the layperson can greatly benefit from them.

Discussion

Dealing With The KJV Issue

I recently talked with a fellow pastor about the King James Only issue that often comes up in our churches. He was concerned about a couple of people in his church who were holding that position and was talking about addressing some weaknesses in the KJV.

-

Discussion

Theology of Separation

I am reading a book called [B: Set Apart[/B: by Kent Hughes. Its a conservative evangelical look at separation from the world. However it only covers one of the separation topics. I also have a small book called [B: The Dividing Line[/B: which is a Fundamentalist look at the doctrine of Separation. However I may want something with more meat to it. I attend a Fundamentalist/separatist Baptist church and am such.

Has anyone read these books and if so what do you think?

Discussion

Credit Where Credit Is Due, Part 1

NickImage

When I was a teenager, the most visible fundamentalists in America were Carl McIntire and Lester Roloff. McIntire was feuding with the American Council of Christian Churches, the General Association of Regular Baptist Churches, several leaders within his own Bible Presbyterian Synod, and the federal government of the United States—virtually simultaneously. Lester Roloff was feuding with the state of Texas. I can remember him sending life-size cardboard cutout pictures of himself to our church in Iowa. He was trying hard to get enough public support to force the Texas regulators to back away from his ministry. The impression that I had of fundamentalist leaders was that they were hard-bitten, bellicose, and arrogant.

This impression had been reinforced through the years by the traveling preachers to whom I had been exposed. These men usually called themselves evangelists, but they were essentially hired guns whose job was to inflame the fears and the sense of shame of the faithful. They could be very personable, laughing and joking one moment, but then the next moment they would be screaming at you because the Communists were going to take over the United States before 1972 unless you went to the altar RIGHT NOW.

I would never have dreamed of criticizing any of these men. Were they not paragons of spiritual insight? Were they not models of Christian virtue? Who was I to call them into account?

Because of their influence, however, I was quite sure that I did not want to be a fundamentalist. Even after experiencing a call to vocational ministry and returning to a fundamentalist Bible college for training, I remained unpersuaded of the value of fundamentalism. During my early years as a college student, it seemed to me that the main activity of fundamentalism was to manufacture unreasonable ways of regulating personal conduct.

This was my frame of mind when I found myself in George Houghton’s summer module on the history of fundamentalism. I had signed up for the course only because nothing else was available to fill the hours. Within a week, Houghton completely reoriented my thinking.

Discussion

The second challenge to my MSTC brothers

Concerning the historical approach to Word [Christ: and Scripture let us briefly look at the following as drawn from Dr. Muller’s Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics - Holy Scripture.

Discussion

Meaning of Rev. 3:20

In a thread discussing a sifilings about a month ago (“Whoever believes…that’s it. It’s not whoever turns, tries, seeks, surrenders, stops, starts or anything else!”[Sept.27: ), a member authoritatively stated: “Revelation 3:14-22 has nothing to do with salvation and never mentions “inviting Christ into your heart.” …”

Discussion

Is Mormonism a "Cult"?

A media “firestorm” (mostly a “manufactured” controversy, I have little doubt) arose recently when Robert Jeffress, pastor of historic First Baptist Church of Dallas, Texas, and a strong supporter of Texas Governor and presidential candidate Rick Perry, declared that Mormonism, the religion of rival candidate Mitt Romney, was a cult. Some in and out of the media expressed concern, disdain, even outrage at this insensitive, even, some said, bigoted remark. Regardless of the response to Pastor Jeffress’ words, the real question is—did he speak the truth? Is Mormonism in fact a non-Christian cult?

The first issue in settling such a question is the matter of definitions. What is a “cult”? I have seen various definitions, but have settled on my own, which is more of a characterization than strictly a definition.

What is a cult?

First, cults claim to be “real” or “restored” Christianity, which had somehow been “lost” somewhere between the first century and the time of the founding of the cult.

Second, cults are almost uniformly non-Trinitarian (most are Unitarian, but some are polytheistic).

Third, cults teach de facto or de jure the inadequacy and incompleteness of the revelation in Scripture, and hence the need for two things:

  1. a new inspired prophet or prophets (usually beginning with if not limited to the founder of the cult);
  2. further divine revelations, which are communicated through that prophet.

Fourth, cults, as with all false religions, teach salvation by means of human religious works.

Fifth, there is no salvation outside the cult.

Discussion