Is Luke 16:19-31 (Lazarus and the Rich Man) a parable?
Poll Results
Is Luke 16:19-31 (Lazarus and the Rich Man) a parable?
Yes Votes: 4
No Votes: 4
Other (Please give explanation below) Votes: 0
Discussion
Bouncing Back When Your Chances Are Zero
God has graciously used my life story and messages to reach people all over the world.
The book is entitled “Bouncing Back When Your Chances Are Zero!”.
I asked my friend Ken Turner to write the “Intro”. Here is what he wrote:
Discussion
Facts and Lies
“Just the facts, ma’am.” This line is widely believed to have been made famous by the character Joe Friday, detective sergeant in the famous Dragnet television series. Actually, Friday never spoke the line. It was popularized by Stan Freberg in his parodies of the show.
Discussion
The Rapture of the Church, Part 9
Read Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5, 6, 7, and 8.
The glorified bodies of believers
Paul’s reply to the questions asked by the Corinthian church about the resurrection body is highly significant and enlightening. First, the substance of that body will be different: “And what you sow [in death, like a seed that is planted], you do not sow that body that shall be, but mere grain—perhaps wheat or some other grain” (NKJV, 1 Cor. 15:37). It is amazing how different is the substance of a stalk of corn from the substance of the tiny kernel that is planted in the ground—from which it came!
On the other hand, the identity of the body that is raised or raptured is the same as the non-glorified body from which it came. “But God gives it a body as He pleases, and to each seed its own body” (1 Cor. 15:38). Perhaps we will even have the same fingerprints!
This principle of continued identity in the midst of changing substance can be illustrated quite easily. I have crossed the great Mississippi River many times. It is always the same river, but not one particle of water in that part of the river I crossed is the same—even an hour later. As for our human bodies, every molecule that was in me 10 years ago has been replaced by another. It has the same identity—but with a different substance.
Discussion
The True Gladness of Wine
The debate over whether Christians ought to consume alcohol is not only an old one but, on the Web at least, a tired one. Much of the tiredness, though, is due to an excess of passion and a shortage of precision. Quarreling has been abundant and arguing scarce. I hope to contribute a bit here to the argument rather than the quarrel.
One example of arguing rather than quarreling dates back to the spring of 2006. I gather that Bob Bixby posted a case against the use of alcoholic beverages by Christians.1 Bob Hayton responded, in part, with an essay entitled “Wine to Gladden the Heart of Man”: Thoughts on God’s Good Gift of Wine. In the essay, Bob Hayton argues not only that “God gave us wine to bring us joy,” but also that the joy He had in mind is an effect of wine’s alcohol specifically.
Speaking of Judges 9:13, Ecclesiastes 10:19, and Zechariah 10:7, Bob observes:
It should be clear that even the intoxicating nature of wine is being praised, here. Wine lifts the spirit and gladdens the heart long before it actually overtakes you and makes one drunk. Wine can be enjoyed and its effects relished without losing control and becoming drunken.
This theme runs through the eight points that form the main structure of the essay. Following the eight points, a section focuses on counterarguments related to the biblical warnings against wine and the use of weaker brother passages. Though Bob wrote the post some years ago, I became aware of it during a discussion here at SI last year and pledged to write a response sometime. Here it is.
Discussion
Book Review - We Believe in One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church (Ancient Christian Doctrine)
We have previously reviewed the first four volumes of IVP’s Ancient Christian Doctrine series (see the reviews here). This series is a commentary on the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed drawn from the writings of the patristic period of church history (AD 95-750).
Discussion
On Writing
At the beginning of July, I became the first research professor that Central Seminary has ever employed. The transition from the presidency to the research professorship took a few months, but now I seem to be getting settled into a new routine. Frankly, I love what I’m doing.
During the years that I was president of the seminary, I continued to teach a full course load. That has not changed—I am still in the classroom and get to experience plenty of contact with students. When I get hungry for more, I park in a chair out in the hall and pretend to read. Almost invariably, one or more students will stop by for good conversation.
The administrative duties, however, have been taken away. In their place, I have been granted the opportunity to devote my time to research and writing. The terms of this arrangement are pretty flexible. I can work at home with minimal interruptions when I need to focus on writing. I can even work from a remote location if I wish. One of my doctoral advisers used to do some of his best work from a “writing shack” in the north woods, and I am giving serious consideration to that alternative.
This week I have been devoting myself to final edits on a book for Regular Baptist Press. The title has not been decided yet (titles typically belong to the publisher and not the author). The volume, however, is an overview of Baptist distinctives and polity.
This is the first time I’ve worked with Regular Baptist Press. Having worked with several other publishers, I have some standard of comparison. Regular Baptist Press is as helpful and easy to work with as any of them. While it has published few new volumes for several years, RBP was recently tasked with producing books that will promote the distinctive position of Regular Baptists. Consequently, RBP was looking for a book on Baptist polity and distinctives at the same time that I was beginning to write one.
Discussion
Book Review - Volumes 3 and 4 of the Ancient Christian Doctrine Series
Amazon Affiliate LinkPreviously, we have reviewed volumes 1 and 2 of the Ancient Christian Doctrine series from IVP. This series of five volumes is a commentary on the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.
Discussion
The Rapture of the Church, Part 8
Read Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5, 6 and 7.
The dead in Christ shall rise
Mere moments after all dead Christians have been gloriously resurrected, all living Christians will be transformed and will “be caught up together with them”—without ever experiencing physical death (NKJV, 1 Thess. 4:17). What a blessed hope!
But what kind of a body will we have when we are ushered into the presence of our Lord “in the clouds,” even being with Him “in the air” (1 Thess. 4:17)? This is a question that cannot be fully answered this side of heaven. But God has given us a few hints which He intends to be sufficient for now.
First, the absolute certainty of bodily resurrection is a basic teaching of the Bible. From the book of Job more than 4,000 years ago (cf. Job 19:25-27) to the book of Daniel more than 2,500 years ago (cf. Dan. 12:2), the people of God were instructed in this doctrine. (See also Ps. 16:9, 10 and Isa. 26:19).
Tragically, some Jews denied this truth. They were the Sadducees, a small but powerful group of leaders in Israel who dominated the high priesthood and were subservient to the Roman emperor. One day they confronted the Savior and ridiculed the concept of resurrection (Matt. 22:23-33).
Discussion