As iron sharpens iron,
one person sharpens another. (Proverbs 27:17)
I found a website today that I can’t wait to immerse myself in. Maybe I am the only one who does a happy dance when I find a resource like this, but I’m ok with being a total book nerd.
If you love books and reading, you WILL check it out. http://newbooksnetwork.com/
Reprinted with permission.
The influence of this movement is increasing within evangelicalism, and I believe many people are in the dark about it. The subject is important also because we tend to view Scripture through the lens of the Reformation instead of the other way round. Although the Reformers got the gospel right, their successors have sometimes appealed to them and not the Bible. At least the New Perspective on Paul (NPP), whatever its merits or demerits, has directed us back to the Bible again.
The so-called “New Perspective on Paul” would be better called “New Perspectives on Paul.” But in whatever variation, and whatever its problems, the New Perspective offers an important and robust challenge to traditional Reformation views of justification and Pauline theology. I should say that I do not dismiss everything the New Perspective has to say. While I am completely in agreement with the Reformers on justification by grace through faith, I am not ready to “throw the baby out with the bath water.”
Not sure this is the right forum, but here goes anyway.
Question: can any being—human or spiritual—legitimately worship God without love? Or, is love a necessary component of worship?
Theoretically, I think it is quite conceivable that worship of false deities is accomplished without love, but can a similar loveless worship be transferred to worship of the true God and still be worship?
Would appreciate your input.
Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem not only remembers those who died in Europe during that awful period from 1933-45, it also honors non-Jews who protected and rescued their Jewish neighbors from death. They are memorialized on the Avenue of the Righteous Gentiles.
In Exodus 17 and 18 I have pondered how the Amalekites, history’s “first terrorists” (17), contrasted so sharply with the Midianites (18) in the ways the two “Gentile” peoples related to Israel after they departed from Egypt. The Amalekites were descendants of Abraham through Esau who viciously attacked Israel (Exo.17:8-16) by killing the stragglers at the rear of the Israelite column (Deut. 25:17-19). In both of these passages God promised eternal vengeance on this people who never ceased in their hatred for Israel until they were finally eliminated in the days of Esther and Mordecai (Esther 3:1; 7:10; 9:14).
The Midianites, however, were descendants of Abraham through Keturah who greeted peacefully the Israelites in the person of their priest, Jethro (Exo. 18:1-12). The father-in-law of Moses is one paradigm of the righteous Gentile who provides for Israel rather than attacks them. While Jethro is best known for his sage counsel to Moses to recruit a team who could help him in his excessive labors (Exo. 18:13-27), there are also some interesting parallels with an earlier righteous Gentile named Melchizedek. Note some of these amazing points of comparison between the two, first suggested to me by John Sailhamer.
Poll Results
How often have you seen or heard of legitimate healings that were statistically unlikely (e.g., terminal cancer, etc.)?
Less than 10% of the time Votes: 10
Between 10 and 50% of the time Votes: 1
More than 50% of the time Votes: 1
Never Votes: 3
Other Votes: 1
Discussion