By Jim May 01 2017 CreationBooksOld EarthYoung Earth Creationism“Cabal and Rasor help us sort through the issues and the options, modeling for us how to use proportion and perspective in our rhetoric and strategies of disagreement within the body of Christ.” 1645 reads There are 4 Comments Another view: Old Universe - Young Earth Jim - Mon, 05/01/2017 - 8:26am Young Earth - Old Universe Creationism Defended The purpose of this article is to present evidence to young earth-young universe creationists supporting the position that the Bible permits a young earth and an old universe. This article is not intended to convince the reader that the universe is necessarily old, but merely to give evidence that this position is consistent with the Scriptures. We accept the position that the creation week consisted of seven literal days and occurred only a few thousand years ago. One verse most often used to justify a young universe is found in Mark 10:6 : "But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female." Here "the creation" is understood by many creationists to mean the creation of the universe. Since the creation week, according to the Bible, occurred recently, this would make the universe young. However, the Bible also suggests that there may be multiple creations. Hebrews 9:11 states: "... not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building [creation]." This verse suggests that there may be other creations. Also, Is 45:12 gives further insight: I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded. This verse presents the concept that the earth was "made" (formed) but man was "created." Thus the creation can refer to the creation of life on earth. The second part of the verse switches the view from earth to heaven, not necessarily in chronological order, but as a literary device of passing from the lesser (earth) to the greater (heaven and all its host). According to this interpretation, the "beginning of the creation" in Mark 10:6 could refer to the creation of life on earth. It might be possible that the universe existed long before. Even the earth might have existed in some primordial form, without life and very much unlike the current earth, before the creation week. During the creation week, the surface of the earth was drastically reshaped, and the earth as we know it came into existence. Thus it would be correct to say that the earth as we know it is young. This viewpoint has some implications for radiometric dating. If one believes the universe is young, then one has to account for the fact that many dating methods agree on meteorites and give ages of about 4.5 billion years. This requires one to hypothesize that some of the physical constants of the universe have changed. If one believes that the universe is old but the earth is young, then it is not necessary to assume that the physical constants have changed, at least not since the very early days of the creation. One can explain the old ages for rocks on the earth as dates partly inherited from the primordial earth, or as due to decay that was accelerated during the flood. This accelerated decay would not necessarily result from a change in the physical constants, but might result from the earth being bombarded by various kinds of radiation during the flood, possibly gamma rays or neutrinos. If such radiation can accelerate decay processes, it likely would not cause all decay processes to accelerate by the same amount, in keeping with the fact that different dating methods on the earth are typically discordant. To me it is unsettling to assume that the Lord changed decay constants to cause the flood, as assumed by D. Russell Humphreys in the RATE study, Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth: A Young-Earth Creationist Research Initiative (ICR and CRS, 2000). As far as we know, the Lord works through natural processes. Did the Lord change physical constants to cause the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah or the crossing of the Red Sea? It seems doubtful because of the many side-effects that would have been caused. Then why would He use such alterations to cause the Flood? Rather, it seems more reasonable that these interventions were caused by the actions of angels or God Himself exerting forces on the physical world. One way to accommodate a young earth and an apparently old universe is to assume that somehow time ran faster during the creation week, so that billions of years passed in the rest of the universe during only one week on earth. This assumption gives the earth a special position in the creation of the universe, which does not seem to agree with the observed fact that the earth is just a tiny part of the Milky Way Galaxy and this is just one of billions of galaxies in the universe. The earth does not seem to hold a special position in the universe and it does not seem reasonable to assume that the earth held a special position in the original creation of the universe. However, during the creation week, which could have been much later, the center of action was the earth. If one accepts Genesis 1:1 as referring to the creation of the universe at some time in the past and Genesis 1:2 to the reforming of the earth during the creation week, then many problems are solved and it is not necessary to assume a change in the speed of light or in the decay constants to explain observed physical phenomena. Thus the statement "In six days the Lord made heaven and earth" (Exodus 20:11) would refer to the reforming, or making, of the earth and not to its original creation from nothingness. Twitter Jim's Doctrinal Statement created with age JohnBrian - Mon, 05/01/2017 - 9:27am I have always understood that since Adam and Eve were created as adults, the universe was also created with the appearance of age. Since the "lights in the expanse of the heavens were created to separate the day from the night." and "for signs and for seasons, and for days and years" [Gen 1:14], and since it takes X millions of light years for the light to reach earth from them, it seems obvious to me that not only was the light source created, but the light immediately reached earth. What purpose would it serve for God to create the light source and then have to wait X millions of light years for the purpose to be realized. I have no problem with the creation of a fully matured universe. CanJAmerican - my blogCanJAmerican - my twitter whitejumaycan - my youtube Adam and Eve TOvermiller - Mon, 05/01/2017 - 9:42am JohnBrian wrote: I have always understood that since Adam and Eve were created as adults, the universe was also created with the appearance of age. It is a simple observation, but yes, Adam and Eve were created as mature adults. This indicates in a straightforward way that it is more than plausible for God to create anything in an advanced form, with the appearance of age and prior development. In the case of Adam and Eve, it actually happened, regardless of how "unsettling" we may find this to be. Thomas Overmiller Pastor | www.studygodsword.com Blog & Podcast | www.shepherdthoughts.com Quote:We’re not debating, for dgszweda - Mon, 05/01/2017 - 4:19pm Quote: We’re not debating, for example, whether Adam and Eve were real people and the first two humans. Ahhh, but you are, if you hold to the Evolutionary Creationism movement that is held to by Biologos.