I Believe in Santa Claus

NickImageThis essay was originally published on December 12, 2006.

The apostle Paul was under arrest, being transported to Rome by a military guard. Along the way, his ship put in at the Lycian port of Myra, where the Roman centurion found a different ship that was sailing to Italy (Acts 27:5-6). The book of Acts does not tell how long Paul was in Myra between ships.

Nobody knows when or how the Christian church was established in Myra. Paul had previously ministered in cities near Myra, so perhaps missionaries from one of those churches may have gone to that town. Or perhaps Paul himself was able to do some preaching while waiting for the centurion to locate a ship to take Paul to Italy.

What we do know is that the church in Myra survived until persecution came under the Emperor Diocletian. The Diocletian persecution was the most widespread and deadly harassment of Christians in Roman history. So systematic and thorough was the persecution that the emperor believed he had wiped out Christianity forever. He even minted a coin to commemorate the event.

Well into the Diocletian persecution, the church in Myra found itself without a pastor. Unable to locate a new shepherd (pastors were special targets of the emperor), the church sought counsel from neighboring pastors. These church leaders gathered in Myra to pray and to seek the Lord’s provision of a new bishop for the church. When they had exhausted every alternative, they gave themselves to a night of prayer. They asked God to send His choice as the first person to enter the church building in the morning.

In the church at Myra was a very young man named Nicholas. His parents were wealthy and privileged, and they were also Christians. Somehow they had escaped the persecution. Though no record exists of Nicholas’s conversion, he clearly was reared in the Christian faith. As he approached manhood, many opportunities were open to him in commerce and civil affairs. He sensed, however, that God had something else for him. He did not know what, but he began to pray for the Lord’s leading. Each period of prayer seemed to bring a greater sense of his unworthiness and sinfulness.

After one long night of struggle, Nicholas determined to go to the church to pray. Arriving early in the morning, he was surprised to find the building occupied by pastors from the surrounding churches. These men asked him who he was, and he replied, “I am Nicholas, a sinner.” Delighted with such a humble response, the pastors announced to Nicholas that God had called him to become the next pastor of the church. Nicholas took this as the answer to his prayers and the Lord’s direction for his life.

Though Nicholas had learned the Scriptures from his childhood, he pondered how a young man could pastor a church during persecution. He knew that Christians had to be taught to live by faith—but how could he teach them? The answer was obvious. He had to teach by modeling, and for Nicholas, modeling faith meant living in complete dependence upon God. Shortly after becoming the pastor in Myra, Nicholas gave away all of his wealth and possessions, committing himself publicly to live only by what God provided.

The city of Myra was dedicated to the worship of Diana—not the Roman goddess, but a goddess similar to Diana of the Ephesians. She was a fusion of the worst features of European and Asian deities. Nicholas abominated this goddess, but he was moved with compassion toward the people who ignorantly worshipped her. Once the persecution ended, Nicholas determined to attack this pagan worship directly. He announced publicly that he intended to demolish the temple of Diana. If she was truly a goddess, then she could stop him without human help. Day after day Nicholas carried his tools to the temple. He dismantled the whole structure stone by stone, preaching Christ while he worked. When he stood triumphant among the ruins, many of the people of Myra abandoned their paganism and turned to Christianity.

There is an old story that Nicholas attended the Council of Nicea. Subsequent researches have shown that this legend is probably untrue, but Nicholas was certainly aware of Arianism. This new heresy denied that Jesus was truly God. It insisted that Jesus was the first and greatest of God’s creatures, but that He was not eternal and did not share the divine nature. The task of the Council of Nicea was to answer Arianism and expose it as a perversion of Christianity. Even if Nicholas never attended the council, he certainly agreed with its decisions. He was a true worshipper of Jesus Christ, the God-man and Savior.

Through the years many stories have been told about Nicholas of Myra. Most of these appear to be fabrications, but some might likely be true. One of these concerns a poor man who had three daughters. Because he could provide no dowry, the daughters could not marry. The father determined to sell them into prostitution as they came of age. Nicholas heard about the plan. The night before the eldest daughter was to be sold, the pastor crept to the man’s home and left a bag of gold for her dowry. As each of the daughters came of age, he duplicated this generosity. For the third daughter, however, the father was watching and caught Nicholas in the act of leaving the money. The story is that Nicholas told him about the forgiveness that Christ offers, and the man repented and became a Christian. Incidentally, the symbol of St. Nicholas is still three gold balls, representing the three bags of gold.

Whether the story is true or not, it almost certainly bears the stamp of Nicholas’s character. His generosity was legendary. That is why he became associated in myth with the giving of gifts, and that is why people still give gifts in his memory.

Saint Nicholas—Santa Claus—was not a fat man in a red suit who drove a sleigh pulled by reindeer. That character was invented by Thomas Nast and other merchandisers during the late 19th Century. Saint Nicholas was a pastor. He was a man of faith, courage, and generosity. He was a true worshipper of Jesus Christ. Every indication is that he was genuinely a saint, according to the biblical definition of that term.

When children ask if I believe in Santa Claus, I tell them the truth. I most certainly do believe in him! Then I tell them who he was. More importantly, I tell them who he worshipped.

Bitter-sweet
George Herbert (1593–1633)

Ah my dear angry Lord,
Since thou dost love, yet strike;
Cast down, yet help afford;
Sure I will do the like.

I will complain, yet praise
I will bewail, approve:
And all my sour-sweet days
I will lament, and love.

Discussion

Great article. When asked if you believe in Santa Clause, people always mean Nicholas, who may or may not have been a Christian.

1 Kings 8:60 - so that all the peoples of the earth may know that the LORD is God and that there is no other.

James,

I am sometimes tone deaf to irony, so I don’t know how to read your post. If it is meant to be a compliment, thank you.

If it is meant to be a criticism, then I’m not sure what the point is.

That we’re not sure whether Nicholas of Myra was really saved? I have as much confidence in his salvation as I have in yours.

That Nicholas of Myra was not doctrinally a Christian? Well, then, what was he? Neither Islam nor Buddhism had been invented yet. He certainly wasn’t a Hindu or a Zoroastrian. We know that he confronted Greco-Roman idolatry as false. He was an opponent of Arianism and a worshipper of Jesus Christ who gave evidence of deep personal devotion. He appears to have been as doctrinally correct as any one of his age.

That people confuse Nicholas with a made-up figure? That’s not a criticism, it’s the problem that the essay addresses. We Christians are supposed to be truth-tellers. That means that we do not confront false mythologies with mere skepticism, but with the truth.

Again, I’m not sure what your point is. Since you thought a comment worthwhile, perhaps you’ll think it worthwhile to clarify it.

Merry Christmas.

Buddha was born 563 BC.

”They asked God to send His choice as the first person to enter the church building in the morning”. I have serious problems with this approach. Would any of you ladies do the same while choosing a partner for life? Would any of you men? If the answer is yes don’t do it at Walmart.

Huw,

I doubt that any of our churches are in danger of taking this approach. As an initial test for a pastoral candidate in a persecuted church, however, it’s not bad. Their approach obviously did not relieve them of responsibility for paying attention to the usual pastoral qualifications.

And Mohammed was born in 570. So the big M and the big B were contemporaries. Exciting days, no?

Kevin

Mohamed and Buddha contemporaries? M was born 570 AD while B was born 563 BC hardly contemporaries.

As for the manner in which they chose the pastoral candidate it was akin to casting lots which was tried by the Apostles and failed. Why should they revert to this form of testing the Almighty? I also doubt that denominations would take this approach today because its a case of jobs for the boys. The boys who regurgitate the same old denominational nonsense that keeps pulpits empty and vex the souls of the saints.

The above should read, keeps pews empty.

I find it strange that these leaders didn’t heed the obvious warning against such silly games as given in the vow of Jephthah.

Huw,

You are of course right about the respective dates of M and B. Funny thing is, I actually knew that—and got confused at the moment. It occasionally happens. Like earlier today when I mistook East for West. How embarrassing!

As for the “silly games” played by the Asian pastors—are you sure that you’re not judging where Scripture is silent? I don’t recall any rebuke issued to Jephthah, and Hebrews 11 lists him as a hero of faith. Nor do I recall any reproof being delivered to the apostles over the selection of Matthias. Shouldn’t we be just a little reluctant to castigate biblical figures where the Bible itself does not?

Besides, the pastors did not take a vow. They did not issue a demand. They simply made a request, and then waited to see what God would do. In the event, their conduct shows that they did not regard Nicholas’ entrance as compelling or his installation as obligatory. He certainly was not made a pastor without further discussion or investigation of his qualifications.

As for your remarks about denominations—I don’t recall having broached this subject. I did mention churches, but a church does not a denomination make. Having said that, and since you brought it up, I believe that separate denominations are probably the best we can do in a world of fallible Christians who are trying to serve their Lord faithfully. In the best sense, denominations permit Christians to recognize each other as genuine Christians without being forced to fight at close quarters about their different understandings of Scripture. So Baptists, Methodists, Plymouth Brethren, and Presbyterians all represent the one body of Christ, “variously denominated.” The only alternatives are hypocrisy and tyranny.

But that’s another subject, and perhaps I’ve missed your point entirely.

Merry Christmas!