On Laying Up Treasures

NickImage

Among the recent criticisms of Bob Jones University, one of the strangest is that the university’s teachers are poorly paid. One critic even prepared a chart showing faculty salaries from independent four-year colleges and universities throughout South Carolina, locating Bob Jones University at the bottom of the salary scale. The (anonymous) critic took this lack of munificence as such an obvious scandal as not even to require comment.

Plenty could be said about the survey itself. Comparisons of this sort are rarely as helpful (or, in this case, as damaging) as they are meant to be. The variables are simply too significant for direct evaluations to be made.

A larger issue is at stake, however. The fact is that the published salaries at Bob Jones University are not greatly out of line with faculty salaries at most Fundamentalist institutions of higher learning (especially if regional cost of living is taken into account). Professors in Fundamentalist institutions are paid far less than their peers in comparable secular colleges and universities.

This situation extends further than just Fundamentalism. Many broadly evangelical schools do not pay their professors much more. I have degrees from two large, evangelical seminaries. In one of those institutions, a tenured professor told one of my classes that, in order to support his family, he had to make $10,000 to $15,000 of outside income every year. A recent reporting instrument shows that institution paying an average salary of only $25,000 per year, less than the reported average for the Bob Jones faculty.

While average salaries are low for Christian professors, they can be even lower for pastors. Many pastors receive no more compensation than professors at Bob Jones. In fact, many receive substantially less. Smaller churches frequently offer salary packages that virtually require pastors (or their spouses) to work outside jobs.

The people who take these positions—these professorships and pastorates—are obviously not taking them for the money. Some other concern is in play. That concern can be expressed in various ways: ministry, serving the Lord, the care of souls. Jesus called it “laying up treasures in heaven.”

When I was thirteen years old, my father left his management position with a major airline to go to Bible college. Over the next several years I watched my parents live by faith, dividing time between schooling, work, family, and, eventually, ministry. In time, I saw my father take pastoral positions without ever asking what his compensation would be. He was convinced that, if he trusted the Lord, then God would supply our needs. God did.

Years later, my own college complete, I attended seminary at an institution where salaries were not only low, they were regularly in arrears. My professors went and found second jobs so that they could continue their ministries in the classroom. These were talented, bright individuals with good educations. They could have gone elsewhere and made plenty of money. But they were committed to the ministry that the Lord had given them. As they saw it, they were serving the Lord. They were caring for souls. They were laying up treasure in heaven.

Episodes like these have affected me deeply. It does something to you when you know that your professor spent the previous night working as a janitor so that he could have the opportunity to be in class teaching you in the morning. Consequently, I am aware that my education is not simply a product that I have purchased, much less an entitlement. It has been given to me as a gift by men and women who have made willing sacrifices, partly because of their love for the Lord, and partly because of their hopes for me. What I have received is something like a trust, committed to me in the hope that I would be able to communicate it to others in turn. To misuse this gift for personal advancement or worldly gain would be a betrayal of the trust.

Not that I am an ascetic. Far from it. I am grateful, not only for the daily provision of needs, but also for a fair number of creature comforts. These I take as additional gifts with which God has seen fit to entrust me. These material things are good, and I rejoice in them. They are not, however, the reason that I choose to minister.

Now, I am embarrassed to have spent these past paragraphs talking about myself. The point is not that I am a wonderful person (much as I wish that were true!). The point is that my own life has been irrevocably altered and bettered by people who did exactly what the faculty at Bob Jones University is doing. By virtue of their sacrifice, I have been made immeasurably richer in the ways that matter most.

What I am trying to do is to describe the attitude that leads highly talented and educated people to settle for salaries that the carnally-minded see as laughable. As a teenager, I saw this attitude in my parents. As a student, I saw it in my professors. As president of Central Seminary, I saw it in colleagues (both staff and faculty) who petitioned me to lower their compensation so that the seminary could prosper.

Because I have been an administrator, I also understand the responsibility that an institution bears toward such self-sacrificing people. Precisely because they can be taken advantage of so easily, they are a sacred trust. God will hold the institution and its leaders responsible for their treatment. My sympathies are with every administrator who struggles with decisions about raising salaries versus meeting other institutional concerns. Professors are not well served if they receive higher compensation (which they surely deserve) for a year, only to see their institution close its doors.

I celebrate the professors at Bob Jones University whose lives do not consist in the abundance of their possessions. I rejoice over teachers like them in Christian institutions all over the country, teachers for whom ministry is more important than wealth. I honor and esteem pastors who sacrifice personal financial prosperity in order to shepherd souls. These people truly are laying up treasure in heaven.

Lord of the Worlds Above
Isaac Watts (1674-1748)

Lord of the worlds above,
How pleasant and how fair
The dwellings of thy love,
Thine earthly temples, are:
To thine abode my heart aspires,
With warm desires to see my God.

O happy souls that pray
Where God appoints to hear!
O happy men that pay
Their constant service there!
They praise thee still; and happy they
That love the way to Zion’s hill.

They go from strength to strength,
Through this dark vale of tears,
Till each arrives at length,
Till each in heav’n appears:
O glorious seat, where God, our King,
Shall thither bring our willing feet!

God is our Sun and Shield,
Our Light and our Defense;
With gifts his hands are filled;
We draw our blessings thence.
Thrice happy he, O God of hosts,
Whose spirit trusts alone in thee.

Discussion

@Mr. Peet:

Your post was well stated and is concise. Christian education has been “on the cheap” for far too long, which is exactly why so many schools have closed and many more should. Not only have they cut corners on teacher pay, but in terms of facilities and programs and the funding to maintain those programs into future years. Science is my field. A science department must have adequate funding either through tuition or science lab fees to enable it to obtain both durable and consumable supplies. There is no shortcut for safety equipment. These are not one time expenses, but have to be given thought for long term maintenance and future growth and improvements. The Internet now provides a viable option for virtual lab activities—a real advantage for smaller schools without a science lab. The added bonus to a virtual lab is that students can actually blow up an experiment with no harm done. But so many schools don’t even allow Internet in their own computer labs let alone for regular classroom access.

All of that is not cheap. Schools that are interested in picking through the public school junk pile, outdated textbooks for free, and how well a teacher can make due with an antique spirit duplicator just won’t cut it in the educational arena for long. Parents don’t like that stuff anymore. They were tolerant of it 30 years ago when Christian schools were trying to get off the ground. Now, when Christian schools should be flying high with at least a competitive product (if not superior to public education), many of them flounder with mediocrity still trying and still promising to get off the ground, someday!

TBD

I am an unpaid pastor. I believe that is Biblically appropriate, as per the example and direct teaching of Paul. Our tiny church could not in any way pay me an appropriate salary, could not, in fact, pay me any salary right now. Zero.

No one, I hope, suggests that our church should cease to exist (leaving no sound church in town), just because of our financial inability to support a pastor. It is good, right, and God-honouring for me to willingly serve in this capacity.

If voluntary “no-pay” is Biblical and appropriate, it is extremely hard for me to see how voluntary “low-pay” is not. If it is appropriate for a church to exist when it cannot pay a pastor at all, it is hard for me to see how it is inappropriate for a school to exist when it cannot pay teachers well, and they voluntarily take a low-pay position.

This post is not intended to endorse real or apparent inequities between pastoral pay and teacher pay. It is not even to say that I believe Christian schools are necessarily the best way to teach one’s children. I believe a stronger Biblical case can be made for homeschooling than Christian schools, though I am not opposed to Christian schools. It is only to absolutely reject the idea, which has been suggested on this thread, that a school should not exist if it cannot pay teachers well.

I can pretty much ditto JG on this. I think part of the disconnect is what duties we believe should be required of pastors, teachers, seminary professors, etc… For instance, a pastor can fulfill his basic pastoral obligations (preaching and teaching) and still work a full-time job. But that means the church does not have 24/7 access to him, and that is often what a church either expects or wants. If they want a pastor that visits church families and visitors, can show up at 2am in the emergency room, do weddings, funerals, organize special meetings, and be able to spend hours counseling troubled families, then they must pay him in accordance with their ‘demands’ of time and energy, or have multiple elders sharing the work. Pastors must be able to attend to the needs of their families first. If the church wants a bigger piece of him, then I believe they must ‘pay’ for it.

On the other hand, I think it unreasonable to expect someone to be a teacher at a CDS- which I would assume means being physically present at the school from 7 or 8am until 3pm- and then work a second job to adequately provide for their family. If you can’t do it well, don’t do it at all. It’s the kids/guinea pigs who reap the consequences of all the dithering about trying to slap together something that looks like it works on the surface but underneath is a complete disaster. Someone please save me from basketball coaches who some how end up teaching science.

As for seminary- which I believe should be a separate function of ‘higher education’ than other vocations- the best case scenario, IMO, is for young men to be mentored and taught by those who know them personally and can ‘lay hands’ on them with the full assurance that they are well-suited to and qualified for ministry. Far too many seminaries and Bible colleges hand out diplomas to guys who can pass the classes, but have the spiritual maturity of coleslaw. Since no one really knows them, they can candidate for churches, who accept the diploma as some kind of evidence as to who this person is, and if the guy can schmooze, the church may end up with a pastor who is a wolf or a hireling. I have many questions and doubts about the viability of the seminary as the primary training ground for pastors and missionaries, so the talk of salaries for seminary professors makes my knees itch.

University is quite another matter entirely. One expects a university to be staffed by people who have spent years studying and perfecting their expertise in an area, and when you pay for an expert, you want to actually get an expert. It is not unreasonable for an expert to expect or require adequate pay for their skills. Or when you need a heart cath, do you choose the lowest bidder?

[JG] It is only to absolutely reject the idea, which has been suggested on this thread, that a school should not exist if it cannot pay teachers well.
I looked back through this thread and I was’t sure where you got the idea or who you thought suggested that a school should not exist is the teachers are not well paid.

I did suggest “adequate” pay.

Thanks

–– Solutions to CDS pay crisis ––
  • Consolidation and merger of smaller schools into regional schools
  • Back office efficiencies using web-based headmaster systems
  • Raising tuitions
  • Engage alumni network to raise scholarship funds

If a corporation such as Microsoft was under scrutiny for its hiring and employment practices, and a spokesman for Microsoft were to address the issues as follows, what would happen?

“Unless you can suggest practical, realistic solutions and actually have the courage to take the leadership of a [corporation] and implement them, I suggest you take a quiet seat in the back of the room.”

I suspect that we would recognize this means “shut up,” and we would be angrier than at the beginning. Shame on you, Mike Harding.

My Blog: http://dearreaderblog.com

Cor meum tibi offero Domine prompte et sincere. ~ John Calvin

[Jim Peet]
[JG] It is only to absolutely reject the idea, which has been suggested on this thread, that a school should not exist if it cannot pay teachers well.
I looked back through this thread and I was’t sure where you got the idea or whom you thought suggested that a school should not exist is the teachers are not well paid.

I did suggest “adequate” pay.
It was post #30.
I taught briefly in one Christian school that paid a salary competitive to what I could earn in a public school…

(snip)

Those parents don’t want any teachers who live in mobile homes teaching their kids. Of course, all teachers—including me—held graduate degrees or were working on them, and were state certified. The school was accredited and its educational program is as credible as any of the local public schools. Smartboard technology is now in most if not all their classrooms. That is what a quality school requires and churches who do not have such resources and support from their clientele should not have schools.
Jim, when I retire, I could easily see myself teaching part-time on a completely voluntary or very low-paid basis in a Christian school. I could teach high school courses in Bible, math (up to calculus level), computer science, and finance. So if there are some voluntary no-pay / low-pay teachers who are needed to keep it going, if it can’t give adequate pay but there are people like that who want to serve in that way, does that mean the school shouldn’t exist?

I don’t object to the principles of appropriate pay, but I object to the absolutism of some statements. That’s all. God’s servants like to give of their time, as well as their money, when they are able. If they do, we should rejoice in the fact that His work is going forward in ways that it might not have gone forward otherwise.

That said, I’ll drop out of this thread, for aspects of this are personally applicable because of the nature of my ministry, and thus there are potentially a multitude of spiritual traps to fall into.

TBD,

Thank you for replying to my post. I appreciate the fact that you did not want to indict specific people and ministries. That is commendable. I think, though, that we are using the term “generalizations” somewhat differently. You seem to be using it as a synonym of general (i.e., not specific), while I am using it more like stereotype (i.e., describing a group of people by a perceived common characteristic). IOW, you talked about your specific situations as if all/most pastors and church-run schools are the same. That’s the generalization which I view as careless simply because it impugns almost all pastors and school admins of churches with schools. Since I addressed your specific comments, I was not generalizing at all—if I had generalized, I would have written something like, “Christian school teachers are constantly accusatory about school leadership over the finance issue.” I didn’t and wouldn’t say that, though. I was not generalizing, but addressing your specific approach to this subject.

I’ll gladly concede that I may be mistaken in my assessment, but I’d ask you to re-read your posts and consider whether you are more negative than you think. From the sounds of your situation, you have grounds to be very disappointed at how your willingness to serve has been taken advantage of. I don’t doubt that there are ministries that do such things, but I hope they are in the minority. Perhaps I am naive about this.

You did make a point that illustrates part of the tension in this discussion—determining what is an actual financial responsibility and what is not. You mentioned your desire to pay your child’s way through college as your parents had done. (As a father of two sons who are done with college, a third who is now in college, and one who will be entering in 18 months, I certainly can sympathize with the economic realities of this.) Can I suggest that this is a noble desire, but not a biblical responsibility? Can I also point out that factoring the ability to pay for kids’ college into the salary discussion makes the task very complex—do I get more pay because I have four kids than the other staff member who only has one? And complexity might be the least of the problems since there are serious consequences to any kind of discriminatory pay practices.

My point is not to debate these things, but to show that the discussion of adequate pay needs more refining that it usually receives. I hope we can all agree that the Christian schools need to do better, but I don’t think they will do better until our focus on the subject is sharpened. I’ll suggest, again, that perhaps a thread or two that put specific elements of this discussion on the table would be profitable for all of us who are involved in Christian education. I am sure you’ve got some good ideas and I’d be glad to hear them. Maybe some other folks who have had success in building a long term staff and taking care of their needs can chime in also. It just seems to me that talking about why we don’t do better is less valuable than answering the question, what/how can we do better? The former seems to degenerate into negative personal attacks, whereas the latter might generate some useful help.

Brother, I’ll close with a text that has been a constant encouragement to me regarding our service for Christ: “For God is not unjust so as to forget your work and the love which you have shown toward His name, in having ministered and in still ministering to the saints” (Hebrews 6:10). Others may have acted unjustly toward your service, but God will not. He sees. He knows. He will remember what you have done for His name. He will care for His servants.

DMD

Thank you Dr. Doran for you clarification and encouragement. I am not sure I perceive the fine distinction between our uses of the term “generalization,” but I think we have a better understanding of each other now anyway, and, that is worth it. There indeed are CDS ministries which do sincerely endeavor to take care of the faculty and staff, and they are blessed because of it. God sees the hearts and motives of the leaders who place a priority on providing a just wage for the servants He brings to them to help them in fulfilling that ministry.

When I chose Christian education, I took the issue of Christian education seriously. I assumed somewhat naively that everyone else viewed it the same way. What I saw as a Divine calling of God, was viewed quite differently by my employers. It represents my perceptions based on my personal experience, not something that is necessarily true in every school. What I viewed as a calling of God, they saw nothing of God in it. I was just a “human resource” to be used for maximum benefit of their ministry. I was expendable. When there was nothing more they could gain from a teacher, the bond was severed and the teacher was replaced for whatever reason. I have often heard administrators use the expression that such teachers were no longer a “good fit” for their ministry–whatever such an expression means. It often meant replacing an older, more experienced teacher with a younger, more enthusiastic rookie … who did not have to be paid for years of teaching experience.

To Susan R: “Or when you need a heart cath, do you choose the lowest bidder? ” This is one of the very points I was making in my posts. We don’t object to paying the rates our physicians charge—or the auto mechanic, or the plumber, or the builder. However, we don’t think of the same principal as it applies to paying a just wage to those who work for us in ministry. The person who has spent as many years in school as a physician becoming an expert in his field of teaching is somehow expected to work for far less than a just wage simply because he works in Christian ministry. The point here is not that Christian ministries must pay the same as any secular organizations, but they should at least endeavor and have the goal of providing the best pay possible. Teachers know when a school is doing that … and have little problem choosing to stay year after year. Such care manifests itself in other ways that transcend the dollar sign, too.

TBD

TBD, If I can interject for just a moment here…you mentioned this in your post:
To Susan R: “Or when you need a heart cath, do you choose the lowest bidder? ” This is one of the very points I was making in my posts. We don’t object to paying the rates our physicians charge—or the auto mechanic, or the plumber, or the builder. However, we don’t think of the same principal as it applies to paying a just wage to those who work for us in ministry. The person who has spent as many years in school as a physician becoming an expert in his field of teaching is somehow expected to work for far less than a just wage simply because he works in Christian ministry.
There’s a disconnect here. You seem to assume that leadership - whether pastoral or by that of a school admin/principal/board - expect that people will willingly take a lesser wage to work at a Christian school because they are asked to by that leadership, and not because the prospective staff is willing to or because the money simply isn’t there to give to faculty and staff (which is where a lot of SI members seem to be landing).

Several people, including myself, have mentioned that this assumption is, at best, uncharitable. No good administrator WANTS to pay the barest minimum amount for faculty and staff; they are our largest assets. We all are aware how critical it is to keep staff happy and well compensated, lest the school run into morale and recruiting problems. The problem is that there are only so many dollars to pass around, and the maintenance and upkeep of buildings, systems, books, and other things all compete with the desire to pay faculty and staff. As several others have said, they’d LOVE to pay the staff generously, but doing that would necessitate either massive increases in tuition (chasing away students) or shutting their doors. That’s not a good situation to be in.

As I mentioned before:
As an IT/DB manager for a small nonprofit, budgets aren’t always as clear as buildings or salary…do you invest, say, in the software to make the employee’s jobs easier or do you take that money and put it into training and education to make the older software last longer? Do you upgrade the three/four year old PC or just buy a new one?

I’ve sat on church boards where we had lengthy discussions about COLA/HSA/other compensation for the pastor - and in another church where the budget that I helped work on came under loud criticism because the pastor’s compensation was perceived as being far more extravagant than the average person’s income in the church, and a proposed motion for a 5% raise (I think) nearly caused a fight…

It’s tough, and whoever leaked that BJU salary data made the financial/accounting side much harder. I think Bauder was wise to address this issue, even in he and others can’t necessarily provide solutions.
I hope this is helpful to you.

"Our task today is to tell people — who no longer know what sin is...no longer see themselves as sinners, and no longer have room for these categories — that Christ died for sins of which they do not think they’re guilty." - David Wells

@JC: actually it is not helpful because it goes back to the same “excuse” I have heard so often before. Of course leadership says they want to pay a better wage to their teaching staff, but more often than not, such statements are as far as it goes. Pay freezes remain in place for years in spite of “promises for next year” or are way below the cost of living if they are given. Often even the annual increase for another year of experience is frozen, or reduced. Benefits have higher deductibles added and employees pay a higher portion of their own health insurance premiums. Retirement programs are practically non-existent, or after being started with the promise of a matching employer contribution—the contributions unfortunately cannot be given because the finances are too tight. IF teaching staff is being asked to live by faith, as they are and do, then where is the point where pastors and administrators start making commitments to their teaching staff on faith, trusting God to supply for those commitments. Living by faith is a reasonable expectation of the teaching staff, but it does not seem to work in reverse. If there is a disconnect, that is where it is, from my perspective. How many Christian schools offer starting teacher pay in the $20K range? Not many. Public schools start in the upper $40K; and a few Christian schools that are really focused on quality and credibility offer starting pay in the upper $20K-lower $30K range. To illustrate a discrepancy: the only pastoral salary that was ever released in any ministry where I was ( the congregation voted on the pastors salary) was $70K+. In all other ministries, the pastors pay was not voted on and was a closely guarded secret.

If I am being uncharitable, maybe there is valid reason for it. Another disconnect—again from my perspective—is the one suggested by Pastor Harding above: that unless I have viable alternatives, I should take a quiet seat in the back of the room. It’s the suggestion that unless I am a leader (pastor or administrator) then my input and ideas are out of order because my job is to do what the leaders tell me and just shut up about anything else. He asks for viable alternatives and ideas, then tells me to shut up and take a seat in the back of the room. In fact, since the doors are likely in the back, I should just leave the room. Leading should be left to the appointed leaders. Teacher’s aren’t paid to think. Their only duty is to do what they are told and keep quiet—they should not even be in the same room with the leaders. That hardly suggests a charitable open-mindedness to any input from me whatsoever. It doesn’t take any brains to tell a critic to shut up and go away. That is none too charitable either.

I do not fault pastors or administrators who really are genuinely concerned about their teacher pay and are doing everything they can to take the leadership role and provide the best in pay and benefits as is possible. God does believe His servants are worth it. Leaders who at least work to that end in tangible ways still may not be able to pay their teaching staff what secular employers may be able to, but the teachers will see the concern and remain loyal to their calling to that ministry.

One ministry, when I accepted their offer, I took a pay cut from an annual teacher salary (CDS) of $22,000 to their base pay level of $15,000. From a strictly materialistic standpoint, the decision was stupid, but we thought God was leading us in that direction. They only allowed $100 per year of teaching experience, $200 per year if it was in their school. However, in the years I was there, they never did keep the contracted agreement of $200 per year experience in their school. Finances were too tight. They told me they provided a 50% tuition assistance benefit for teachers working on grad degrees. When I was accepted into grad school and asked about this benefit, the business manager had never heard of it and told me he would have to ask the chairman of the deacon board and get back to me. He never got back to me. Finances were too tight, I was told by the principal. They hired me with the stipulation to upgrade their science dept to the next level. None of my suggestions, no matter how detailed and well-documented were approved and I was asked why I couldn’t do better by just doing what they had always done before??? Finances were just too tight.

In the end, it is the students who pay (suffer) for that kind of leadership that does not really take its mission and calling very seriously. It is no wonder so many schools have closed or are struggling just to get from one year to the next.

TBD