The Christian School

NickImage

Christian primary and secondary education (sometimes called “Christian Day School”) became popular among fundamentalists during the 1970s. While some have alleged that the Christian school movement was a response to racial integration,1 it was more likely a reaction against the increasingly vicious secularism of public education. For a generation, many Christian parents sent their children to Christian schools, even when the cost of tuition meant significant financial sacrifice.

Over the past decade, however, most Christian schools have begun to decline. Administrators speculate about the reasons, but at least a few seem pretty obvious. These are generalizations that will not hold in every instance. Certain tendencies, however, can be observed more often than not.

First, Christian schools have not typically produced a better academic product than public education. True, the average test scores from Christian school students are higher than those of public school students. That is partly because public schools are required to accept students (including special education students) whom Christian schools uniformly reject. Take the top ten percent of graduates from the typical Christian school, and compare them to the top ten percent of graduates from the typical public school, and you will likely find that the public school graduates are better prepared.

A second reason that Christian schools are in decline is because they do not generally produce a better quality of Christian. Granted, the environment of a Christian school does shield its students from the most brutal influences of the secular school environment, such as rampant drug use and open promiscuity. It also grants Christianity a normative status, so that a student’s faith is not overtly and constantly under attack. Nevertheless, graduates of Christian schools do not seem to be noticeably more spiritually minded than Christian graduates of public schools. The real test is in what happens to Christian school students after they graduate. How many of them are walking with the Lord five years later? The proportions do not seem markedly higher for Christian school alumni than for other Christians of the same age.

A third reason that Christian schools are declining is the massive amount of resources that they consume. Hiring qualified teachers and maintaining excellent facilities takes money—lots of it. Both parents and churches have grown fatigued by the constant expense, but somebody has to bear the cost. Though exceptions do exist, few churches are actually able to operate a Christian school at a profit. Budgets are often balanced on the backs of teachers, who are pitifully underpaid. Consequently, hiring qualified faculty becomes exponentially more difficult, with the result that unqualified individuals are sometimes placed in the classroom. This in turn affects the performance of the school, and declining performance only exacerbates the problem.

In view of the foregoing, does the Christian school still have a place? If so, what is the contribution that it should be expected to make? A preliminary answer to these questions can be deduced from two observations about the nature of the Christian faith.

First, Christianity is a religion of text, and Christians are people of the Book. True Christianity derives its entire faith and practice from the written Word of God. No authority is higher than the Scriptures.

Second, Christianity affirms the priesthood and soul-liberty of the believer. Among other things, this means individual Christians are responsible to know and understand the Scriptures for themselves. Spiritual authorities may help believers to interpret and apply the Scriptures rightly, but they may not take over the duty of Christians to know and obey the Word of God.

These two considerations have powerfully shaped Christian ministry. They have led to massive dissemination of the Christian Scriptures. No other ancient document was as widely copied as the Bible. No other book has been as widely translated, printed, and distributed. Throughout Christian history, believers have given their lives to protect, translate, and publish the Scriptures. This work has been paramount because Christianity is a religion of text.

Since Christianity is a religion of text, it can thrive only where believers are skilled readers. In order to know and apply the Scriptures for themselves, Christians must be able to read and understand with precision. This is not so much a matter of any special unction as it is a matter of good preparation. The tools for understanding the Bible are not significantly different from the tools for understanding any serious literature.

Biblical Christianity survives only where people read skillfully. Necessarily, then, every Christian church has an interest in ensuring that its members are skilled readers. Unskilled adults, however, usually resist efforts to foster new intellectual skills. This leaves children and teens as the target constituency for fostering the proficiencies that are necessary in order to prepare skillful readers.

What are those skills? The ordinary reading and understanding of serious literature requires, at minimum, a mastery of the disciplines known as the Trivium. Grammar deals with the way that words are connected so as to constitute communicative units. Logic examines the relationship between ideas to determine whether one idea necessarily arises from or gives rise to others. Rhetoric structures communicative units so that the connections between them are readily followed and grasped. The Trivium ought to be the core of a Christian school curriculum.

The standard interpretive method used by Protestant readers of the Bible is called “grammatico-historical.” The idea is that texts must be understood according to both their grammar and their historical location. Historical interpretation assumes and relies upon knowledge of history. To the Trivium, Christian schools must add history.

The Scriptures contain literature from a variety of forms and genres. Skilled readers must be comfortable dealing with diverse sorts of writing. This skill is gained only by broad exposure and wide reading. Literature has its place in the curriculum of the Christian schools.

For generations, Western Christians have relied upon public institutions to prepare their children. Over the past several decades, however, public education has de-emphasized literacy in favor of ideology. Unfortunately, Christian schools have spent much of their effort constructing and emphasizing an alternative ideology rather than fostering excellence in those skills without which Christianity cannot survive.

Does the Christian school have a future? The above observations imply that it does, if it takes seriously the work of preparing Christian readers. Most of a twelve-year curriculum could be derived from these considerations alone—and other considerations could be offered that would justify a fully liberal education in the arts and sciences.

Christian schools do have a future and they ought to be perpetuated. They have no reason for existence, however, if they merely offer “less of the same” thing that students can get in public institutions. Christian education ought to be different. The difference should not lie in making every course a stale tract for Christianity. The difference ought to lie in the gravity with which Christian educators take their task and in the thoughtfulness that they foster in their students.

Notes

1 For references see William J. Reese, “Soldiers of Christ in the Army of God: The Christian School Movement in America,” in Leslie Francis and David W. Lankshear (eds), Christian Perspectives on Church Schools (Leominster, England: 1993), 274.

Hymn 1:1
Behold the Glories of the Lamb
Isaac Watts (1674 –1748)

A new song to the Lamb that was slain. Rev. v.6-12

Behold the glories of the Lamb
Amidst His Father’s throne.
Prepare new honors for His Name,
And songs before unknown.

Let elders worship at His feet,
The Church adore around,
With vials full of odors sweet,
And harps of sweeter sound.

Those are the prayers of the saints,
And these the hymns they raise;
Jesus is kind to our complaints,
He loves to hear our praise.

Eternal Father, who shall look
Into Thy secret will?
Who but the Son should take that Book
And open every seal?

He shall fulfill Thy great decrees,
The Son deserves it well;
Lo, in His hand the sovereign keys
Of Heav’n, and death, and hell!

Now to the Lamb that once was slain
Be endless blessings paid;
Salvation, glory, joy remain
Forever on Thy head.

Thou hast redeemed our souls with blood,
Hast set the prisoner free;
Hast made us kings and priests to God,
And we shall reign with Thee.

The worlds of nature and of grace
Are put beneath Thy power;
Then shorten these delaying days,
And bring the promised hour.

Discussion

Roland,

Wayward kids come out of Christian School all the time as well!

Roger Carlson, Pastor Berean Baptist Church

One other thing….I know a guy who got the Christian Character award 4 years in a row at a Christian school…He was a asistant prayer captain as a sophomore…prayer captain as a Jr and sr…chaplain of soceity and still unsaved. That was me…i was a good pharisee but I was not saved by God’s grace until I was a Senior at BJU

Roger Carlson, Pastor Berean Baptist Church

What if parents ask, “Do your teachers have degrees in their teaching fields?”

How many schools have math, science and foreign language majors on their faculty?

How many would replace their current history teacher with a history major if they had the opportunity?

And while we’re asking questions; how many men does your school have as faculty to serve as role models for young men?

"Some things are of that nature as to make one's fancy chuckle, while his heart doth ache." John Bunyan

Roland,

I was responding to your statements that indicated there was no Biblical justification for sending kids to public school. I am not anti Christian education. I am saying that for some,public school is the beat option. It is for us with two of our kids and if God keeps us here will be for all 4. I am resting in God’s plan for us.

Do my kids have battles Christian school kids don’t? Yes. But they also have privileges. My oldest daughter has respect of her peers. They know her stand and many admire it

Roger Carlson, Pastor Berean Baptist Church

Roland,

Can you really deny Bauders critique? He is not anti..just trying to make the movement better

Roger Carlson, Pastor Berean Baptist Church

I look forward to you airing your disagreement. It is actually what the thread is about. But as someone who has seen every aspect of all types of education, my experience agrees with his views. I have found them to be accurate.

Roger Carlson, Pastor Berean Baptist Church

[RPittman]
[Susan R] When I went to Christian school, drug use was rampant, and fornication was taking place in every nook and cranny. The student body knew who was doing whom and how often. There were pregnancies and abortions, unbeknownst to the staff, usually because the parents were trying to preserve the status quo, so it wasn’t uncommon for the girl who got an abortion last week to get a Christian Character Award next week.
Well, whose fault is this? The parents! Unless the drug use and fornication occurred on campus or under school auspices. Christians schools are not the guarantors of students’ spirituality, moral purity, or freedom from drugs. This is the parents’ responsibility. However, no Christian school worth its salt will knowingly tolerate these things.
I don’t think we are disagreeing. I’ve said that character training and education rests primarily with the parents. And it’s true that there are no guarantees, because children grow into independent adults who make their own choices, regardless of the tools that they’ve been given by parents, church, school, etc…

My whole point was that it is a mistake to assume that a Christian school is full of Christians. The staff and curriculum may be Christian, but a significant percentage of the student body is likely not, and since traditional schooling lends itself to peer dependency, it is also highly likely that more influence will be exerted and absorbed by other students than by staff. It takes a very, VERY vigilant and involved parent to counteract this tendency.
[RPittman] I can quickly name several schools where your description is totally off-base. However, there are schools still like this. We must remember that around 30 years ago or more, many of the students, especially high school, were essentially products of public schools. Christian schools had their tremendous growth spurt due to the sexual revolution, drug culture, etc. of the 1960-70’s. There were problems due to students having already been exposed to these vices before matriculating at Christian schools. Now, it appears that majority of Christian school students have been there long-term.

A large problem today, though, are the parents who attend church and send their kids to a Christian school meanwhile allowing their kids to run indiscriminately with a worldly crowd, go to teen clubs, imbibe the world’s music, standards, media, and dress, hang out unsupervised at the mall on the weekends, etc . On Monday morning, these kids bring the world and PS into the Christian school classroom.
Both of us only have anecdotal evidence to support our conclusions. But- the school I attended was considered to be the most conservative school in the area, as well as excellent academically. It was, by all the standards that most people associate with a well run school, a well run school.

Humorous (or not) anecdote- to be a cheerleader, athlete, etc… you had to agree to even more restrictive rules than what applied to the rest of the student body. So (not only being a cheerleader but on the speech team) one day I’m supposed to be studying for debate at the local library, but I grabbed a friend and we went to the Mall instead to see Flashdance. While I was there, we ran into a couple of guys on the basketball team, so we went to the movie together. When I got back, the principal met me and my girlfriend at the door and asked us where we’d been. I told him I went to the Mall to see Flashdance. He laughed, and said “No, really- where were you?” So I told him I went to the library to study for debate. He believed the lie. He didn’t believe me when I told him the truth, and I knew he wouldn’t, because I was known for being a ‘good kid’.

I said that to say this- kids are not stupid, and adults who think they are, are stupid.

So- how do these schools that you can quickly name maintain moral and ethical purity in their student body, and in the lives of the parents? What policies does the school have in place to prevent the kids from bringing the world into the classroom, and how do they enforce it? Maybe what I should ask instead is- “What is a “well run” school?”- or we are going to be talking past each other, which we are well on our way to doing already.
[RPittman] Even the best home cannot guarantee a child’s character or behavior either. There are very good families having three kids with shining spiritual lights and serving God while the fourth growing up in the same home is living a life of sin and wickedness. This is not what Christian education is all about. It’s not about measurable results, because no one can produce spiritual results except God but it is about our faithfulness as parents and teachers in teaching the Word of God by mouth and example. We plant, water, and fertilize but God gives the increase.
I agree- I think a huge problem with Christian schools and with the parents who send their kids to one is ANY assumption that certain methods and policies will guarantee spiritual and moral results. Certain methods and policies are wise, preferable, prudent, etc… but we can never, NEVER rest on the idea that these rules are all the fences we need.

I’m not going to address the public school vs. Christian school question- it’s too far, IMO, off the topic of this thread.

Christian schools are in a unique position to toss out everything that is wrong with traditional schooling and, without gov’t control and intervention, do a much better job at partnering with parents, presenting solid information with a Christian worldview, and inspiring creativity and critical thinking. As long as Christian schools mimic public education, because “That’s the way we do it, furthermore, that’s the way we’ve always done it” (Harold Leake), they are not only going to have the problems that the federal system faces, but the additional headache of attempting to legislate spirituality.

Christian schools have a lot riding on the word “Christian” in their title, and I think they (generally) have trouble prioritizing the needs of the students over the ‘testimony’ of the school. Any time we operate with the good of the institution in mind while kicking children to the curb, we become spiritually worthless and IMO morally putrid.

Although worldview is important, it is not the only, or even the main argument for Christian education. Depending on theological persuasion, there are many Christian worldviews, not just THE Christian worldview, out there.
A worldview is not a comprehensive set beliefs about everything. It’s a set of beliefs that forms a foundation or grid or framework (several metaphors work) for arranging your beliefs about everything. There is only one Christian worldview. Though people may differ some on how they define the fringes of it, a few differences does not comprise a different worldview, just a slight variation of the same one.

But this isn’t really all that relevant to the topic except, I guess, in talking about what schools are good for vs. what church are home are best suited for.

On Bauder’s assertion that academic product is not better from Christian schools (generally), he explains in the essay how the statistics work in his view. You declared this to be a “red herring,” but that’s not really a counter argument. His explanation is that the generally higher test scores among Christian school kids has to do with the fact that they do not have to deal with as broad a spectrum of test takers—including many that would come in at the very low end. Then he argues that the top x% in the typical Christian school roughly matches the top x% in the public school. The implication that is that he believes this should not be the case. Due to the larger and more ability-diverse student body in the public schools, the top tier of the Christian school ought to be much higher than the top tier of the public.

Of course, it’s valid to question the stats here. I don’t have that kind of data. I would not be surprised to find that he’s right, though, because, as he points out later in the piece, most Christian schools have embraced a paradigm in which they respond to the ideological focus of the public schools by having an opposite ideological focus.

My own take on that is that too many Christian schools see themselves primarily as places to pursue sanctification rather than places to pursue education. But this is defeating because they are nowhere near as well equipped as church and home for the mission of sanctification (and the church and home tend to be less able to accomplish the goals of education).

So in the schools there is alot of preaching and alot of ideological repetition, etc., but not enough equipping with the disciplines of thought and communication. This is true of both public and most Christian schools, only the content of the preaching is different.

It would really be surprising if the academic results were not pretty much the same.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

I went to 3 different Christian Schools by the time I graduated high school and I can say that all of what Bauder says is spot on with maybe one exception. One of the Christian schools I went to actually had pretty decent academics despite that fact that they did not use the trivium (and we wore uniforms there as well ;) ). The difference? They cost more to attend because they put the money into paying good qualified teachers. They were still underpaid compared to their public school counterparts but it was better than the 2 other schools I attended.

This brings us to the present. That better Christian school I attended is more than twice what it was when I was there 12 years ago. Bottom line is, good Christian education costs way too much these days for the average person. It is to the point that it can be considered a luxury like buying a bass boat or weekend Harley to ride except you have to pay for it every year.

We are homeschooling our kids and using Classical Conversations which is based on the trivium. This kind of schooling allows parents of lower incomes (who are willing to teach their kids themselves) to give their kids a good education for a fraction of the cost.

Even if Christian schools use the trivium that has only fixed the educational quality and not the cost. The whole model needs to change is more Christian children are going to get a good education.

To piggy back on Aaron’s statements about schools as a means of sanctification, I would like to say that Christians schools have taken on this task for two reasons.


  1. , they are confused about the purpose of Christian education. Christian education is to teach kids a liberal education from a Christian perspective that sees all of the subjects as connected to God and show how God shapes and informs each of them.

    [list=2]

  2. , as they have with the church, parents have given over their parental role as discipler of their children to the school. This sanctification mentality can be really seen when a Christian school tries to be a mission school to unsaved children but never actually evangelizes them. This is the experience I had in two of the three schools I went to. In my experience, the school becomes no better of an atmosphere than a public school. On the other hand, I have a teacher in our church who teaches at a mission Christian school and they have a lot of success with it. It is in GR, MI which may account for the success but maybe it can work in some places.

    If Christian schools could understand what their purpose is - to educate kids - then they might be more successful. If parents could understand their purpose - to disciple AND educate their kids - then they might be more successful as well.

RPittman, are there any books or articles that you would recommend from your side and any that critique the classical model? I love to read on both sides of everything.

To clarify my comments on Christian schools and sanctification I would say that there seems to be an imbalance in some schools to major on this at the expense of other goals. A truly Christian education will certainly include moral and spiritual aspects. But then again that is part of the value of the trivium - it seeks to show the spiritual nature of all of the disciplines as they fall under the rule of God as their creator. This is why public education will always fail and could never truly adopt this model or a similar model with the same goal.

True, a good education will not make you successful but then again it can’t. Seminary cannot make a guy a successful pastor - that’s not its intent. It provides a person with the tools and guides them on how to use them once they are on their own with them. I, as well as many others, know people who have had full rides to great schools and then they flounder once they are done. They had a solid education and achieved good grades but end up far from their educational potential based on their educational background.

This is the problem we have with seminaries and the church right now. Churches are expecting schools to do for the student and future pastor what they are not designed to do nor can do. School gives the tools and the church gives the context to use them as they gain them. The schools and the church must work together to educate the student in the area they are meant to. They can both dip into the other but they must major on what they are designed to do. The same goes for K-12 grade education.

I suppose the definition of a good education depends on what you define as education and therefore what an educated person looks like.

I think there is value in academics because God created everything and therefore it is worth knowing and studying. Again, this is part of the foundation for a Christian understanding of the trivium.

Given your points on the downfalls of the trivium, do you think it can be reformed to be successful in today’s world? I think its underlying goals are correct but that does not mean it cannot be tweaked to fit the contemporary setting better given the changes.

RPittman, I could be wrong but from what I have been told and have read the classical model as practiced by some Christians is designed to address the whole person. My wife and I are using the model used by Classical Conversations curriculum. Based on the explanation and from my interpretation of it, it is a holistic approach to education. This is what drew us to it.

Yes I would love to see the class notes!

Forgive my ignorance but where do you teach?

Worldview, as I use the term, is simply one’s underlying philosophy, the lens through which you interpret life. It will either be based on Biblical principles- hence a Christian worldview- or it isn’t. A Christian education certainly does entail teaching the precepts of the Word of God, but helping kids (and adults) think critically and interpret life, their experiences, culture, etc… properly, is the application of those principles.

As for data comparing public and private schools (as far as academics go)- there are some studies, for what that’s worth. I don’t believe we can do much more than come to a few general conclusions based on stats and studies.

http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/studies/2006461.pdf] Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling

This website gives an overview of why most folks believe that private schools have an advantage over public schools-

http://www.greatschools.org/find-a-school/defining-your-ideal/59-privat…] Private versus public- Some differences between public and private schools are obvious. But deciding what’s right for your child entails shedding light on the subtle distinctions many parents ignore.
Private school students typically score higher than public school students on standardized tests, but a 2006 study (pdf) by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), which took into account students’ backgrounds, told a different story.

Public school students in fourth and eighth grade scored almost as well or better than their private school peers in reading and math, except that private school students excelled in eighth-grade reading.

A Harvard University study (pdf) challenged the results, using the same data but different methods. Researchers found that private schools came out ahead in 11 of 12 comparisons of students.

Earlier in 2006, an analysis of math scores by two University of Illinois researchers found similar results to the NCES study. “Charter, Private, Public Schools and Academic Achievement” (pdf) states that “after accounting for the fact that private schools serve more advantaged populations, public schools perform remarkably well, often outscoring private and charter schools.”

But as this dissenting view from the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation’s Education Gadfly newsletter shows, the debate over which kind of school does a better job is far from settled.
Most folks believe intuitively that private schools should do better, based on admissions policies, the assumption of involved and invested parents, better socio-economic status, etc… but just because private schools are “schools of choice” doesn’t mean they are more efficient or effective.
[CPHurst] Bottom line is, good Christian education costs way too much these days for the average person. It is to the point that it can be considered a luxury like buying a bass boat or weekend Harley to ride except you have to pay for it every year.

We are homeschooling our kids and using Classical Conversations which is based on the trivium. This kind of schooling allows parents of lower incomes (who are willing to teach their kids themselves) to give their kids a good education for a fraction of the cost.
Isn’t that just crazy? I mean, here we are fussing about how much a Christian education costs because of the overwhelming expense, but yet a low income family can homeschool very effectively at minimal cost. I’m spending about $120 this year on curriculum and supplies. For 3 kids.

The traditional top heavy Chalk and Talk for the Sit and Git is not the best teaching/learning method. http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/ed_cert_1101_20071129024241.pdf] Credentials are not the best indicator of an effective teacher . http://www.mcte.org/journal/mej07/3Henry.pdf] Standarized testing is not an accurate measure of learning . These are Flat Earth paradigms that need to be turned on their heads if we want kids to flourish academically, and also affordably. Isn’t it nice that we can have both.

Homeschoolers have already thrown themselves on the education grenade. Perhaps its time for Christian schools to do the same. If it truly is a ‘ministry’, then why should the church limit ‘ministering’ to those who can afford it?

Susan, as I mentioned earlier my wife and I just started using the Classical Conversations material. In fact, my wife is going to be a tutor!