1 Thessalonians 4 and the Rapture
Image
Many American Christians have questions about something called “the rapture.” These questions are often tied to a particular flavor of premillennialism called “dispensationalism.” According to this framework, “the rapture” means “the idea that Christ will remove the church from the world prior to the great tribulation.”1 They believe the rapture is before the Great Tribulation, so it is “pre-tribulational.” This teaching relies heavily on 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, along with other supporting passages. This article will evaluate whether this passage teaches a pre-tribulational rapture.
Brothers and sisters, we do not want you to be uninformed about those who sleep in death, so that you do not grieve like the rest of mankind, who have no hope. (1 Thessalonians 4:13)
Paul begins a new subject at 1 Thessalonians 4:13.2 Maybe the church had written to Paul with this question, or maybe Timothy had relayed it in person (1 Thess 3:6f). Regardless, Paul doesn’t want the church in Thessalonica to be upset and grieve, as if they had no hope.
Why are they upset? We don’t know how the issue came up, but wrong ideas seem to taken root in the congregation about Jesus’ return. This isn’t surprising, because Paul didn’t spend much time with them before he was run out of town (Acts 17:1-9).
What is this hope that ought to stop them from grieving? Paul explains:
For we believe that Jesus died and rose again, and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him. (1 Thessalonians 4:14)
Paul explains3 that, because Jesus has died and rose again, in the same way4 God will bring with Jesus those who have died (“fallen asleep”) while in union with Him. So, anyone who believes that Jesus is the hinge upon which God’s single plan to rescue us and this world turns—that is, any believer—will be resurrected and be with Jesus forever. This means there is hope, whether the believer is alive or dead.
According to the Lord’s word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. (1 Thessalonians 4:15)
In fact, the believers who are alive when Jesus returns will not be “first in line” to see Him. The dead believers will not be left behind. What does this mean? Paul explains …5
For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. (1 Thessalonians 4:16)
The reason dead Christians won’t miss anything is because Jesus Himself will come from heaven and resurrect “the dead in Christ” first. Jesus will come very publicly, very loudly—accompanied with both a piercing battle cry6and the sound of a blasting trumpet. So, the dead believers will be resurrected first—but what about the believers who are still alive when Christ returns?
After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever.(1 Thessalonians 4:17)7
After the dead in Christ are resurrected in the same way as Jesus (i.e., miraculously), those who are still alive will be caught up, snatched, or suddenly seized away8 into the clouds to meet Jesus in the air as He returns. This happens right after the resurrection of the dead believers, so that together they will meet Jesus in the air as one group. And so, Paul concludes, in this way all believers will be with the Lord for all time.
The point is that dead believers have reason to hope. They will miss nothing. So, when Paul makes his conclusion at the end of v.17, he’s drawing those strands together. He’s answering a question about whether the dead in Christ will miss out when Jesus returns. The answer is no, both dead and living believers will meet the Lord together in the air. In this manner, all believers will be with Jesus forever.
Therefore encourage one another with these words. (1 Thessalonians 4:18)
So, does 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 teach that the Lord will remove the church from the earth before the Great Tribulation? No, it does not. The passage isn’t about the rapture at all. It’s about how those who are in relationship with Jesus, whether alive or dead, always have hope that they’ll be with Him forever when He returns. To be sure, the passage contains the rapture, but that isn’t the same thing as being about the rapture.
Paul doesn’t answer the question about rapture timing. He doesn’t address that issue at all. He simply says that, when Jesus returns, both dead and living believers will meet Him in the air as one group and be with the Lord forever. Paul doesn’t say what happens next.
- Does the group (a) then ascend back to heaven with Jesus, (b) clearing the way for the Great Tribulation on the people of Israel, and then (c) return to earth with Jesus afterwards?
- Or does the group simply fall in behind Jesus in the air as He continues His return—in which case this meeting is like a divine triumphal entry in which they met Him “half way”?
Paul doesn’t say. You must bring in other passages to make the case for a pre-tribulational rapture. I’ll examine the most common support passages in follow-up articles. But the evidence in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 does not support any particular timing for the rapture.
Notes
1 Millard J. Erickson, The Concise Dictionary of Christian Theology, revised ed. (Wheaton: Crossway, 2001), s.v. “Rapture, Pretribulational view of the,” p. 167.
2 The NIV omits the transitional conjunction δὲ.
3 The conjunction at the beginning of v.14 is explanatory (γὰρ).
4 The adverb of manner at v. 14b (οὕτως) explains that our dying and rising again will happen in the same way as Jesus.’
5 The conjunction at the beginning of v.17 (ὅτι) is explanatory.
6 BDAG, s.v., “κέλευσμα,” p. 538; LSJ, s.v., p. 936.
7 Gk: ἔπειτα ἡμεῖς οἱ ζῶντες (nom. apposition) οἱ περιλειπόμενοι (nom. apposition) ἅμα σὺν αὐτοῖς ἁρπαγησόμεθα (paired with ἡμεῖς)ἐν νεφέλαις εἰς ἀπάντησιν τοῦ κυρίου εἰς ἀέρα· καὶ (conclusion) οὕτως πάντοτε σὺν κυρίῳ ἐσόμεθα. “And then we—those who are alive and are still here—will be snatched away together with them into the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so, in this way we’ll be with the Lord for all time.”
8 BDAG, s.v., “ἁρπάζω,” sense 2, p. 134; LSJ, s.v., sense 2, p. 246.
Tyler Robbins 2016 v2
Tyler Robbins is a bi-vocational pastor at Sleater Kinney Road Baptist Church, in Olympia WA. He also works in State government. He blogs as the Eccentric Fundamentalist.
- 1179 views
I don’t think the comparison is between tribulations the Christians have suffered through church history and The Tribulation. It seems that the tribulation of the end is a particular kind of tribulation directed at a particular people. It is of particular intensity and purpose. 1 Thessalonians 5 says that we, the church, are saved from the wrath that is to come. You can try to make that the eternal wrath but that doesn’t fit the context very well. 1 Thessalonians 5 is a pretty strong pre-tribulation passage. I am not convinced that 1 Thessalonians 4 is a particularly strong pre-tribulation passage. In any event, when I see someone compare the sufferings of church history to the the Revelation about the sufferings of the 7-year tribulation, particularly the last 3 and 1/2 years which is called the time of Jacob’s trouble, I wonder if they have given appropriate weight and understanding to the revelation of what that tribulation will be like and the fact that unlike church history tribulation for Christians, it does not seem to be directed at believers.
If the Messianic prophecies were so clear in the OT, why did the disciples not understand them?
If the prophecies of Israel and the end times so clear in the OT and the NT, why will the church not understand them?
They are the same answer? Why do we continue to fight over things we do not understand?
I am not sure they are that hard to understand. Lots of NT evidence that many understood such as John the Baptist, Simeon, Anna, the prophets (e.g, 1 Peter 1). Sure there were some who didn’t understand because of the hardness of heart, the blinding. And there were some who didn’t understand because they only believed part of it (eg. Luke 24). But by and large, I think there was a good understanding.
I think part of the problem is that there are a lot of what amounts to dualism today. For instance there are many who reject a rebuilt temple of Ezekiel because of some supposed (and dare I say created) conflicted with a crucified Christ. But the text says what it says. So on what basis do we claim we know better than God who inspired it? There are many who completely miss Eph 2 that the church is a “new man,” not a continuation of the old Israel.
Scripture quite frequently uses time or sequence references (this then that; after; before; when; first; second; etc.). Exegesis would seem to demand that we actually try to create the timeline somehow. I find it hard to believe that John wrote 22 chapters simply to say “Jesus is coming back.” Surely there is at least something else in there.
I am not sure it will be solved until people agree on what to do with words and sentences and paragraphs. But I fairly sure we should simply punt as if we have no revelation.
Discussion