A Baptist Engagement with ‘The Case for Christian Nationalism’
“I am not pitting the Bible against reason. I am pitting Wolfe’s application of reason against what I consider the Bible’s own exegetical and redemptive reasoning.” - 9 Marks
- 5 views
Wolfe protests that no one is engaging the arguments of the book. One really cannot, though, because he has insulated the book against attack if that critique doesn’t begin and ultimately end with logic itself. To that end, the book is “rigged” from the start if one doesn’t find his claims compelling.
Wolfe’s argument goes something like this (he states something similar himself on p. 183):
- Government has a duty to promote true religion.
- Christianity is true religion.
- Therefore, government has a duty to promote Christianity.
The problem is the major premise (including all three key concepts: government, duty, and promoting).
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
Kevin DeYoung also wrote a great review of Wolfe’s book. It is found linked in the above article. DeYoung’s article is long, but worth the read.
Discussion