Reposted, with permission, from DBTS blog.
Despite many advances over the last century in archaeology and biblical backgrounds, together with a growing field of studies in biblical theology, consensus concerning ancient Israel’s perspective of the afterlife remains elusive. The view that conscious life continued after death was pervasive not only in ancient Israel but throughout the ancient Near East. Defining and conceptualizing Sheol in the OT and in Israel’s social practices, however, remains a notorious difficulty.
In the past half-century surprisingly few detailed studies of Sheol have appeared. Among these, most scholars conclude that the ancient Israelites believed that all the dead went to Sheol. In contrast to this understanding, however, a number of biblical passages appear to hold out hope for the deliverance of the godly from Sheol (Gen 5:24; 2 Kgs 3:3–10; Job 14:13; 19:25–26; Ps 16:10–11; 49:15; 73:24; Prov 15:24; 23:14; Hos 13:14). In studying these latter passages, I have come to the conclusion that ancient Israel, from the perspective of the biblical text, and likely also within its social-cultural practices, distinguished the destinies of the righteous versus the wicked in the afterlife. The righteous were understood to ascend to God for a beatific afterlife replete with continued fellowship and joy, while the ungodly were seen to descend to the gloomy underworld known as Sheol to await future judgment by God.
In this post I want to develop a brief biblical portrait of Sheol. I will then examine one key text—Psalm 16:10–11—that is central to the debate and that holds significant implications for NT interpretation. The term Sheol occurs 66 times in the OT and with its synonyms, usually translated “pit,” occurs as a lexical field around 100 times. No cognate words for Sheol have been discovered outside biblical Hebrew. Although R. Laird Harris argued that Sheol is simply a metaphor for the grave, the term is understood usually to mean the underworld or the realm of the dead. A person descends to go to Sheol and ascends to escape from there (Gen 37:35; 44:29; Num 16:30, 33; 1 Sam 2:6; 1 Kgs 2:6, 9; Ps 55:15; Prov 5:5; 7:27; 15:24; Jon 2:6). Sheol is cosmologically opposite to heaven (Job 11:8; Ps 139:8; Isa 7:11; Amos 9:2). The earth opens to swallow those who go to Sheol (Num 16:30, 33; Prov 1:12). The region is depicted as a dusty, slimy, and cavernous internment for the shades, full of worms and maggots (Job 17:16; Ps 30:9; 40:2; 140:10; Isa 14:11; Ezek 32:18–32; Lam 3:6). Sheol is a place of lethargy and weakness (Eccl 9:10; Isa 14:10), silence (Ps 31:18), oblivion (Ps 88:13; Eccl 9:5), confinement (Job 40:13), distress (Ps 116:3), and darkness (Ps 143:3; Lam 3:6). Fullness of life within a special relationship to God is absent there (Ps 6:6; 30:10; 88:11–13; Isa 38:18–19), as are distinctions of class or rank (Job 3:17–19; Isa 14:9–10). Nearly always Sheol is the destination of the ungodly (Deut 32:22; Job 21:13; 26:6; 27:20; Ps 9:17; 139:8; Prov 5:5; 7:27; 9:18; 15:24; 23:14).
In spite of these negative conceptions, most scholars conclude that the ancient Israelites held that all the deceased went to Sheol after death. While I stated earlier that in Scripture primarily the ungodly descend to Sheol, a few apparent exceptions may be found, involving OT believers who faced a premature death under the specter of divine judgment. Jacob (Gen 37:35), Hezekiah (Isa 38:10), Job (Job 17:13–16), Jonah (Jon 2:3), and the psalmist Heman (Ps 88:4) envisage descent to Sheol, in each case due to a feared untimely death through illness, loss, or abandonment under the shadow of divine disfavor. Elsewhere Job imagines a potential descent to Sheol but holds out hope for a postmortem vindication, longing for God to reverse his decision to send him down to Sheol: “Oh that you would hide me in Sheol, that you would conceal me until your wrath be past, that you would appoint me a set time, and remember me!” (Job 14:13 [esv]). In each of these cases the believer imagines an expected descent to Sheol but in the end is delivered from actually going there by the redemptive power of Yahweh. Thus it is significant that while OT believers in some cases feared consignment to Sheol, no OT believer is designated clearly as going there after death.
Several OT passages, in fact, while speaking of the terrors of Sheol anticipate that the righteous will be delivered. The balance of the biblical evidence suggests, rather, that Israel distinguished the destination of the righteous after death as compared with that of the unrighteous. The faithful in Israel expected a future life characterized by upward movement to God rather than descent to Sheol. Psalm 16:10–11 is one of the key passages to advance this idea.
Psalm 16 is a psalm of trust/confidence and a confession of faith. The psalm is traditionally attributed to David. The psalm divides into five short stanzas of about two verses each (vv. 1–2; 3–4; 5–6; 7–8; 9–11). In the final stanza the psalmist anticipates deliverance to God’s presence, envisioned as the path of life, rather than abandonment to Sheol. Two concepts are crucial to evaluating the psalmist’s understanding of Sheol and the afterlife. (1) The positioning of the Hebrew verb ‘zb (traditionally “abandon”) with the object “my soul” and complement “to Sheol.” (2) The significance of “the path of life” which the Lord makes known to the psalmist.
First, the psalmist expresses the hope that Yahweh will not abandon his soul to Sheol. The Hebrew verb occurs just over 200 times in the OT and means “to leave (behind),” “forsake,” “abandon,” or “let go.” The term appears only a handful of times in this type of construction in which the accusative (the entity being left) is positioned with a preposition governing the complement sphere, physical or metaphorical, in which the entity is left behind or to which the entity is left to go (Gen 39:12–13; 50:8; Ps 16:10; 37:33; Job 39:14; Neh 9:19, 28; 2 Chron 12:5; 24:25). In surveying these occurrences, the constructions are about evenly divided between one of these two basic senses. In Gen 39:12–13; 50:8; Neh 9:19; and 2 Chron 24:25 the accusative is already in the sphere expressed by the complement and is abandoned to remain in that sphere. In Job 39:14; Ps 37:33; Neh 9:28; and 2 Chron 12:5 the accusative is not yet in the designated sphere but is released or given over to that sphere (or, conversely, not given over).
Key to our discussion is whether the psalmist in Ps 16:10 means that Yahweh will not leave him behind in Sheol after he is already there or that Yahweh will not allow him to descend to Sheol at all. Based on these parallel uses, several reasons suggest that the latter sense is intended. First, the threat of Sheol is conceptually close to the examples of the second group where in each case a faithful (or unfaithful) follower is prevented from falling into or is given over to a menacing enemy. The parallel in Ps 37:33 is particularly suggestive. In that scenario the godly believer is kept back from destruction through divine guidance and protection, similar conceptually to what the psalmist anticipates here. Second, the preposition (le) governing the complement in Ps 16:10, as in Job 39:14, suggests that motion toward the sphere is in view rather than abandonment while in the sphere. Third, the verb conjugation (imperfect) hints at a future expectation in which the psalmist will be delivered before reaching the sorrowful destination. The connotation appears to reach beyond the immediate situation to entail confidence in ultimate deliverance. His hope will be dashed if in spite of his prayer he still descends to Sheol at the end of his life. His confidence appears, rather, to rest in the fact that the Lord will keep him out of Sheol altogether. Thus, while many commentators see here a hope for deliverance from an untimely death or a hope for future resurrection after languishing in Sheol, it is a hollow deliverance and a thin hope if the psalmist’s consignment to Sheol is merely delayed or shortened rather than overturned.
Second, Psalm 16 ends by extolling communion with Yahweh, which is characterized as the path of life, replete with divine presence, complete joy, and pleasures at God’s right hand. Some view the path of life as indicating continued communion with God in the temple. Its usage elsewhere in the OT, however, appears exclusively in wisdom contexts focused on the life-or-death significance of observing the warnings of Torah (Prov 2:19; 5:6; 10:17; 12:28; 15:24). In these passages the path of life is contrasted consistently with death and descent to Sheol. These passages suggest that the path of life is conceptually a fixed opposite to Sheol and the realm of death and points, in fact, in the opposite direction. Waltke concludes rightly that “the movement from ‘below’ … to ‘upwards’ fits the biblical teaching that the godly terminate their journey in the presence of God himself (Pss. 16:9–11; 73:23–26; John 14:1–4; 2 Tim. 4:18; Heb. 12:2). Salvation from the grave is more than being spared an untimely death, for otherwise ‘the path of life’ is finally swallowed by death” (Proverbs 1–15, 106).
In the light of the foregoing discussion, I submit that a better translation of Ps 16:10–11 runs along the following lines: “You will not give over my soul to Sheol nor allow your faithful one to see corruption. You reveal to me the path of life; in your presence there is complete joy; at your right hand are endless delights.” David here expresses hope that God will deliver him completely from the destiny of the wicked, namely, from the clutches of Sheol.
While our discussion has proved necessarily brief, this overview suggests that work remains to be done in correlating the biblical evidence. While the hope of OT believers is often characterized as fuzzy and limited, and their prospects for the afterlife bleak, I would suggest that we sell them short. Their confidence in God’s deliverance was rich and robust. Their faith should fuel our own contented expectation that death and the grave have lost their power and sting, certified for the church by the resurrection of our Savior, Jesus Christ.
Kyle C. Dunham is the associate professor of Old Testament at Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary in Allen Park, Michigan. He has been at DBTS since 2016. Prior to coming to DBTS, Dr. Dunham served from 2011–2016 as the Associate Professor of Old Testament and registrar at Virginia Beach Theological Seminary. Previously he was adjunct professor at The Master’s Seminary in Sun Valley, California, and at Northland International University in Dunbar, Wisconsin.