I found an interesting perspective on the golden calf incident while studying today.
At Horeb they made a calf and worshiped the cast metal image.
They exchanged their glory for the image of a grass-eating ox.
Psalm 106:19-20
Derek Kidner comments:
In Romans 1:23 Paul quotes from the LXX of verse 20, They (ex)changed the glory…, in his great indictment of heathen man. Neither he nor this psalm, nor again the recorded wrath of God and Moses (Exod. 32:10,19), leaves any room for the view that the idol was a mere focus for worship of the true God. It was an exchange. There is withering contempt in the aside, that eats grass’ and there is irony in the fact that in this choice they parted with their glory (lit.; cf. RV, NEV; and see Jer. 2:11), for they had no other, only the God they served.
Discussion
NewContra Kidner
Comparing what happened in the Golden Calf incident with what happened with the calves that Jeroboam made later to pervert the worship of Israel argues against the view that Kidner sets forth.
Thomas L. Constable in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: OT (p. 512) writes concerning the calves that Jeroboam made:
It is also worth noting that neither in any of the six passages in the Bible that speak of the Golden Calf incident nor in any of the passages concerning the golden calves that Jeroboam made are any false gods named as the objects of the worship of the people in either setting.
Moreover, Jeroboam’s appeal to worship using his calves was based on the assertion that it was too much for the people to go up to Jerusalem.
There was no worship of false gods going on in the temple in Jerusalem at the time of Jeroboam. Had he been appealing to the people to turn totally from worshiping Yahweh to worshiping false gods, his assertion that it was too much for them to go to Jerusalem would not be an applicable consideration.
The parallel between the Golden Calf passages and the passages about Jeroboam’s calves supports holding that in both cases the calf/calves were used as physical objects to distort the worship of Yahweh and not as physical objects to worship false gods.
NewRajeshG wrote:
NewKevin Miller wrote:
NewThey forgot God
Psalm 106:21 goes on to say that they forgot God who saved them from Egypt. It’s pretty clear that they were not in any way worshiping Yahweh with the golden calf. That doesn’t have anything to do with the calves that Jeroboam made centuries later and his rationale for worshiping them.
Newpvawter wrote:
These verses show that after the calf had been made, Aaron built an altar before it. He then proclaimed that tomorrow would be a feast to the Lord. It is undeniable that Aaron declared that what would take place on the next day after the calf had already been made was a feast to the Lord, which was worship of Yahweh.
Even if it could be proven unequivocally that the calf was a representation of a false god or multiple false gods, you would have to explain how Aaron in that case still thought/intended that Yahweh was going to be worshiped in the feast that would have taken place on the next day.
NewDoes "After" Mean "This"?
Why didn’t Aaron say that “This is a feast day to the Lord.”?
Is it possible that the golden calf is seen an additional God, especially to a mixed multitude coming from a polytheistic culture? Perhaps something like, “We’ll go to Mass today and to the Baptist church tomorrow.
"Some things are of that nature as to make one's fancy chuckle, while his heart doth ache." John Bunyan
NewRon Bean wrote:
There is no Bible evidence to support the suggestion that they engaged in some kind of worship of the calf on the day that it was made and then worshiped Yahweh in a feast to the Lord on the next day.
NewThis is an interesting
Newjosh p wrote:
Newjosh p wrote:
NewRajeshG wrote:
If you read my posts again you’ll see that I’m commenting on Psalm 106, in which it is made quite clear that the golden calf was not merely a stand-in for Yahweh but a false god which the people exchanged for the true God. The flow of thought from Ps 106:19-21 says nothing about which day they worshipped the calf, but it emphasizes that the issue was their stubborn idolatry that they brought with them from the days of their fathers.
NewRajesh,
Rajesh,
In the earlier thread on the GCI, you seemed to put a lot of weight on Paul’s commentary on Ex. 32 in the book of 1 Corinthians. I’m simply pointing out here that Psalm 106 also offers commentary on it that should be taken into account, and it seems to suggest that the issue was the worship of a false god rather than improper worship of Yahweh.
Newpvawter wrote:
My initial response was based on what I think is a significant parallel between the GCI and the Jeroboam accounts.
In addition, comparing all six of the passages about the GCI is crucial to understanding it fully. If you have not already done so, I would recommend that you study all of them together and see if you still believe that Psalm 106 is teaching what you at this point think that it is.
NewRajeshG wrote:
ill have to check that thread again. I don’t remember the Elohim discussion.