By Jim on Thu, 03/05/15 Anything Else Weird Jimenez ordered fajitas that were placed in front of him in a “sizzling skillet.” When he bowed his head “close to the table,” the ruling says, Jimenez heard “a loud sizzling noise, followed by ‘a pop noise’ and then felt a burning sensation Discussion New"but the Lord was not in the [fire] ..." Thu, 03/05/15 “but the Lord was not in the [fire]…”1 Kings 19:11-12 Twitter Jim's Doctrinal Statement NewLocal news coverage of the same Fri, 03/06/15 http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/03/05/court-man-burned-by-fajitas… Twitter Jim's Doctrinal Statement NewThe Onion's take ... Sat, 03/07/15 http://www.theonion.com/articles/court-man-cant-sue-applebees-for-burni… Twitter Jim's Doctrinal Statement
New"but the Lord was not in the [fire] ..." Thu, 03/05/15 “but the Lord was not in the [fire]…”1 Kings 19:11-12 Twitter Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewLocal news coverage of the same Fri, 03/06/15 http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/03/05/court-man-burned-by-fajitas… Twitter Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewThe Onion's take ... Sat, 03/07/15 http://www.theonion.com/articles/court-man-cant-sue-applebees-for-burni… Twitter Jim's Doctrinal Statement
Discussion
New"but the Lord was not in the [fire] ..."
“but the Lord was not in the [fire]…”
1 Kings 19:11-12
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewLocal news coverage of the same
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/03/05/court-man-burned-by-fajitas…
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewThe Onion's take ...
http://www.theonion.com/articles/court-man-cant-sue-applebees-for-burni…
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement