When Followers Don’t Follow: The Art of Persuasion
Image
Though many of us don’t think of ourselves as leaders, we all find ourselves in situations where we’re responsible to some extent for “getting other people to do things” (or stop doing things). In that sense, we’re all leaders occasionally.
Previously, I introduced three primary tools leaders have at their disposal (coercion, persuasion, and influence), overviewed how the three differ, and explored some ways we tend to use one of them—coercion—badly (with self-defeating consequences).
Paul’s letter to Philemon draws our attention to the second tool—persuasion—and even a brief look reveals a great deal about what persuasion is, how it works, and why we should try to get better at it.
1. Persuasion offers compelling information and reasoning.
Paul has two goals in the epistle: to see Philemon accept the runaway slave, Onesimus, back into Philemon’s home and to put Onesimus and Philemon’s relationship on a new footing. Much of the letter consists of arguments—reasons why—Philemon should do this. Seven stand out.
- Philemon 13 – Onesimus is a huge help!
- Philemon 15-16 – You can now have him as a brother rather than a slave.
- Philemon 17 – You can do this for me as your partner.
- Philemon 18 – It won’t cost you a dime!
- Philemon 19 – You owe me this.
- Philemon 20 – You can make me happy.
- Philemon 21 – It would be so like you to do this, and more.
Paul uses some personal appeal, emotional appeal, and maybe even a bit of subtle guilt-tripping here. But his basic approach is a reasoned one that aims to change what Philemon believes about the situation, and as a result, what he does.
This is what persuasion, as distinct from coercion, seeks to achieve.
2. Effective persuasion is wisely delivered.
For Paul, beginning epistles with affirmations and thanks was routine. Nonetheless, those affirmations were genuine—and selective. To Philemon, he wrote,
I hear of your love and of the faith that you have toward the Lord Jesus and for all the saints, 6 and I pray that the sharing of your faith may become effective for the full knowledge of every good thing that is in us for the sake of Christ. 7 For I have derived much joy and comfort from your love, my brother, because the hearts of the saints have been refreshed through you. (ESV, Philemon 5–7)
In these few statements, Paul frames the entire persuasive effort as (a) an appeal to a man’s already-demonstrated godly motives (“love and … faith”), (b) an appeal rooted in the man’s personal relationship with Paul (“I have derived much joy and comfort from your love, my brother”), and (c) an appeal to a man with a track record for expansive and generous serving of others (“the hearts of the saints have been refreshed through you”).
The words of appreciation not only open Philemon up to listen to Paul’s requests, but also set the stage for what sort of case he is going to make—and how that case is likely to be perceived. The entire effort is suffused with respect.
So many leaders self-sabotage their persuasive efforts from the start by adopting a condescending and insulting tone. It’s more than a little puzzling. Isn’t it obvious that we all pretty much dig in when we’re approached that way? (It’s true that both John and Jesus rebuked Pharisees and other phonies with a “condescending and insulting tone”—but the Pharisees were not the audience they were trying to persuade!)
By using this tool, Paul is respecting Philemon. He is not only communicating what he’d like Philemon to do and why, but by using persuasion rather than coercion, he is telling Philemon “I know you are the kind of person who is open to change, open to learning, open to arguments that might call for a change in course.”
This is the same sort of respect Paul is communicating even to the likes of the troubled church of Corinth (1 Cor. 10:15, though he tempers that praise in 1 Cor. 6:5 and nearly reverses it through sarcasm in 2 Cor. 11:19.)
Whenever we aim to persuade, we are implying the respect that is due to reasonable people (James 3:17).
3. Persuasion requires influence.
Note the wording of v.9: “for love’s sake I prefer to appeal to you—I, Paul, an old man and now a prisoner also for Christ Jesus.”
The subtext here seems to be something like, “You wouldn’t disappoint and old man stuck in jail for serving the Lord, would you?” There’s nothing low about Paul’s use of this angle. His many years of hard, hard service truly entitled him to be taken seriously, and the fact that he chooses to be so gentle with Philemon makes that personal credibility even stronger.
Similar allusions to Paul’s influence occur in Philemon 17, 19, 20, and 22. One of the most poignant is v. 17: “So if you consider me your partner, receive him as you would receive me.”
Though we often need to persuade people who don’t know us well, some basic level of at least provisional ethos is vital to the process. Even communicating with a hostile audience, we have to be winsome enough to at least gain a hearing for the length of time it takes to unfold the case. And that pinch of influence can go a long way.
Here, though, Paul has the deeply rooted and strong respect of Philemon to leverage. And he uses it well.
4. Whenever the situation allows, persuasion is better than coercion.
In Philemon v.8-10, Paul identifies two distinct strategies for gaining the result he desires from Philemon. He goes out of his way to choose one over the other—and explains why.
Accordingly, though I am bold enough in Christ to command you to do what is required, 9 yet for love’s sake I prefer to appeal to you—I, Paul, an old man and now a prisoner also for Christ Jesus— 10 I appeal to you for my child, Onesimus, whose father I became in my imprisonment. (Philemon 8–10)
The contrast between “command” and “appeal” here is not precisely a contrast between coercion and persuasion, but it’s close. Commands are typically backed by an implied or stated “or else,” or occur in the context of a potential consequence of some sort. His choice to “appeal” is a choice to persuade. Nor is that preference for persuasion unique to the book of Philemon.
For even if I boast a little too much of our authority, which the Lord gave for building you up and not for destroying you, I will not be ashamed. 9 I do not want to appear to be frightening you with my letters. (2 Cor. 10:8–9)
For this reason I write these things while I am away from you, that when I come I may not have to be severe in my use of the authority that the Lord has given me for building up and not for tearing down. (2 Cor. 13:10)
Paul’s attitude toward the use of his authority is a beautiful thing. First, he recognizes that his authority is a means to an end, not an end in itself. Second, he realizes what that end is—building up, not destroying. Third, he knows where his authority came from, as a trust (“the Lord gave… the Lord has given”). Fourth, the resulting attitude is that—apostle though he is—he does not want to use the authority to command in any situation where doing so would not truly edify.
This is why the pastoral epistles sometimes call for rebuke, but over and over urge Timothy or Titus to teach patiently, gently, firmly, lovingly.
Verse 14 sums up his attitude.
But I preferred to do nothing without your consent in order that your goodness might not be by compulsion but of your own accord. (Philemon 14)
That Paul shows a preference for persuasion shouldn’t surprise us. Christianity and the Great Commission are all about genuine belief, and nobody has ever been coerced into faith.
Limitations
As vital as persuasion is to leading people, it’s not always the right tool for the job. Part 4 will consider situations where persuasion is contraindicated.
Aaron Blumer 2014 Bio
Aaron Blumer, is a Michigan native and graduate of Bob Jones University and Central Baptist Theological Seminary (Plymouth, MN). He and his family live in small-town western Wisconsin, not far from where he pastored Grace Baptist Church for thirteen years.
- 55 views
I have to admit that I want this series to continue partly because the picture of the kid sticking his tongue out cracks me up.
“Aaron, I think Susan nails my objection to describing incentives and such as coercion”
Call them whatever you like. The point is that they are not persuasion and they are not influence because the would be leader’s personal standing is irrelevant (mostly) and the would-be follower’s values and beliefs are ignored (again, mostly).
Both punishments and rewards are “tool 1”/”or-elsing” and have their place, but they are short term and pretty superficial campared to the other tools in the box.
“Plus, if we take a look at persuasion, exactly how do we separate persuasion from what’s in it for us?”
It’s not all that difficult, but maybe I need to write up a handful of scenarios to make the differenes more clear. A few quick ones off the top of my head:
Tool 1 | Tool 2 |
Leader: “Everobdy who makes 10 widgets this week gets a bonus” Follower: “I’ll work hard to get a bonus.” | Leader: “These widgets are helping diabetics control their sugar, avoid blindness, avoid the agonies of neuropathy, avoid losing limbs. Your work is life changing.” Follower: “I’ll work hard because I want to help the company help people.” |
Leader: “Students caught consuming alcohol will be kicked out of school” Follower: “I’ll skip that party because I’d be in so much trouble!” | Leader: “Alcohol is inherently dangerous, addictive for many, and completely unnecessary in our times. It’s wise to develop a life-long habit of avoiding it.” Follower: “I’ll skip the party because this is not something I want in my life.” |
Leader: “No son of mine is going to grow up to be a lazy good for nothing, but you’re well on your way! Clean your room, you slob!” Follower: “I’ll clean my room just for a little more peace… ” (With growing resentment, anger, alienation, etc.) | Leader: “Laziness is natural for all of us. I still fight it in myself nearly every day. It’s my job to help you learn to overcome it. And taking care of our stuff is part of our stewardship to God. All we have is from Him, and it’s our responsibility to manage it well. Let’s clean your room together then we’re going to clean my tool room together… because it’s a mess too!” Follower: “I’ll clean my room because what he’s saying makes some sense. Maybe he’s right and this is more important than it seems.” (And doing it with Dad is kind of fun.) |
- Examples 1 and 2 show tool 1 and tool 2 being used well.
- Example 3 is a poor use of tool 1… and the use of tool 2 there also intertwines with some tool 3 (influence/personal standing/trust)
Again, it’s important not to be distracted by what we call these leading activities. The issue is using them well… because if we don’t, the result is often that followers don’t follow.
Hope that helps some.
To Darrell, one more time just for kicks…
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
Aaron, i get your desire to address “just the truth” and “incentives to act according to the truth”, but with the dictionaries I’ve seen, they’re really both under the banner of persuasion. And it’s simply my view that, given the horrendous results of abuse of coercion, it’s important to draw a line between coercive and non-coercive methods—incentives falling into the non-coercive realm.
A way of illustrating it is in your first example; the coercive part of this is “if you don’t fill your quota, you get fired.” At least that’s how it worked in one factory I worked in, and all the hourly folks said that was what they were used to. The incentive part is “if we make our profit numbers, you get a bonus.” Slightly different formulation from what you’ve said there.
And as much as I love the picture, I think you need some better ways to get your kids to clean their rooms. :^) Some of my favorite ways are to point out that it’s not just a matter of “daddy likes it this way”, but of basic health and safety.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
I don’t think I have much to add to what I’ve already said.
Leveraging self interest is certainly not the same thing is persuading people to act on deeper beliefs and values. Nor is personal standing the same thing as leveraging self interest or bringing a person to belief. So there are at least three distinct realities there… and if even terming them “tool1” “tool2” and “tool3” doesn’t work for you, I don’t think I can offer any further help.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
Discussion