Fundamentalism: Whence? Where? Whither? Part 11

NickOfTime

The Social Shift, Continued

Read Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, and Part 10.

The Fundamentalist movement emerged from a broader, “proto-Fundamentalist” evangelicalism in about 1920. It was the result of a combination of influences, some social, some philosophical, and some theological. For the most part, Fundamentalism drew on a version of Christianity that was firmly committed to the popular culture of late Victorianism.

Fundamentalism arose on the cusp of a significant cultural shift. America was moving out of Victorianism and into the Jazz Age. For a while, Fundamentalist leaders like Billy Sunday were able to use this transition to their advantage. Many Americans faced the new direction with anxiety. By mixing their religious appeal with nostalgia for the fading values and fashions of Victorianism, Fundamentalists were able to tap into this anxiety and to rally the dispossessed.

Unfortunately for Fundamentalism, this tactic could succeed only as long as there were Victorians to rally. By the 1930s, however, the Jazz Age had lost some of its rough edges, and its values were quickly being adopted by the nation. Even Fundamentalist churches were beginning to feel the pressure of new perspectives.

The rapid transition was due partly to the dominance of three new technologies: the phonograph, the radio, and the motion picture. Popular culture is commercial culture, and these media made it possible to market the product more widely and effectively than ever before. Entertainment was fast becoming an industry, and the industry sold its mores with its culture. The new media were especially influential among the young, generating an entire youth movement within American culture. Indeed, it is possible to argue that the teenager was an invention of the Jazz Age.

Fundamentalism was committed to popular culture, but the social shift was rapidly making Fundamentalist culture obsolete. Victorianism was no longer culturally relevant: Fundamentalists might as well have been singing Gregorian chants as Rodeheaver songs. In fact, they might have done better, for Gregorian chants could still be taken seriously, while Rodeheaver and his kind seemed increasingly quaint (perhaps even eccentric) to everyone except Fundamentalists.

If it was to survive, Fundamentalism needed to adapt to the new culture. The trick for Fundamentalists was to make this change while not appearing to abandon their older commitments. Their answer was to create a kind of replacement culture within Fundamentalism, a culture that would parallel the secular popular trends but that would eliminate their most obnoxious features.

One of the earliest manifestations of change within Fundamentalism was the invention of the Singspiration. A Chicago Tribune headline from 1941 announced, “Church Folks Blend Voices in Pep Choruses: Singspirations Strike a Popular Chord.” The article went on to say that the new kind of choruses were to church what boogie woogie was to swing.

The analogy is telling. This was the era during which crowds were flocking to the Savoy Ballroom and the Cotton Club. It was the era of big bands, when broadcasts and recordings of Duke Ellington, Count Basie, Bennie Goodman, the Andrews Sisters, the Dorseys, and especially Glenn Miller were played in nearly every household. The music was pure energy: raucous, defiant, often flirtatious, and always full of life. By the end of the 1930s it had become mainstream and extremely popular: every high school had its own swing band.

This was also the golden age of Hollywood movies. With the ascendance of the talking motion picture, a new kind of celebrity was invented: the movie star. Film music also provided another musical idiom that inundated American culture. The music of the movies contrasted with the jazz of the clubs. It was lush, typically orchestral, emotionally overwhelming, and rather operatic. Along with jazz, this was music to which American young people were widely and frequently exposed.

The Singspiration took the place of movies and dances for Fundamentalist teenagers. It gave them music that was peppy and current enough to be cool, or lush enough to be dreamy, while packing less of a hormonal charge than the secular equivalents. It was an alternative to jazz clubs and theaters, and it was so much fun that teenagers could take a date or even invite an unsaved friend.

Quickly the Sinspiration became institutionalized. Two students at Wheaton College, Al Smith and Billy Graham, collaborated to start a ministry that would publish Singspiration-style music. They named the ministry after the phenomenon.

At almost the same moment, a young trombonist who had once led a dance band was emerging as a Fundamentalist leader. Jack Wyrtzen was more-or-less the Fundamentalist answer to Glenn Miller. His organization, Word of Life, became a major front for the growing evangelical youth movement.

In their attempt to reach teenagers, Fundamentalists went popular culture one better. Wyrtzen developed the idea of conducting “youth campaigns.” The idea was picked up by Al Smith and Billy Graham, who were joined by George Beverly Shea. Together they started a series of youth rallies in Chicago under the sponsorship of Torrey Johnson. As the idea spread, the nationwide “Youth for Christ” organization was established.

There was no secular equivalent to the Youth for Christ campaigns. These campaigns built on the success of the Singspiration idea, but size of the crowd was multiplied exponentially. They were like a Christian variety show, to which was added the rapid-fire pulpit delivery of some very dynamic young preachers.

These young preachers abandoned the oratorical preaching style of the older Fundamentalists. To a generation whose ears were tuned to the cadences of radio, the older oratory seemed ponderous. These young firebrands modeled themselves on the speech patterns of radio announcers. The effect was riveting to their audiences. Names like Jack Wyrtzen, Charles Templeton, and especially Billy Graham became celebrities within the new Fundamentalist youth culture.

At about the same time, John W. Peterson was writing music that imitated the Hollywood sound. His songs, choruses, and cantatas (a term that he applied rather loosely) took the place of traditional hymns, and even of Victorian gospel songs, in thousands of Fundamentalist churches. Fundamentalism not only had its equivalent to the jazz club, it also had its answer to the Big Show.

Speaking of Hollywood, Fundamentalists did more than copy the music. They also tried to adopt the medium, albeit clumsily. In 1949, Ken Anderson launched Gospel Films. Billy Graham’s World Wide Pictures was formed soon afterward, releasing Mr. Texas in 1951, followed by Oiltown U.S.A. in 1954.

After Billy Graham’s 1949 crusade in Los Angeles, Fundamentalism’s celebrity status began to spill over into the culture at large. On the one hand, newspaper mogul William Randolph Hearst sent out the order to “puff Graham,” turning the evangelist into a religious superstar almost overnight. On the other hand, the conversion of Stuart Hamblen during that crusade gave Fundamentalism a new recruit with real celebrity status. Other secular celebrities soon followed suit, and Fundamentalists discovered that these were people who could draw a crowd.

By the mid-1950s, Fundamentalism had shown that it could successfully negotiate the modified popular culture. Its tactics had changed, however. Under Victorianism, the popular culture of the society and the popular culture of the churches had been one and the same. With the transition to the Jazz Age, Fundamentalists opted against full participation in the broader culture. Instead, they created a parallel culture within their own movement: a culture that imitated popular trends while eliminating their most obviously offensive aspects.

This cultural adaptation produced several results in the next generation of Christians, the generation that was born after World War II and grew up bathed in the Fundamentalist subculture. First, that generation was highly youth-oriented and expected a Christian answer to every popular trend. Indeed, Christian Baby Boomers came to feel a sense of entitlement to some “Christian alternative” for every activity and pleasure that their world could offer.

Second, the generation of Singspiration and youth rallies became unable to distinguish Christianity from amusement. As the culture of Youth for Christ worked its way into the churches, they became highly entertainment-oriented. To a larger extent than ever before, worship became a product that had to be packaged to appeal to the consumer. Out of this milieu emerged a myriad of ostensibly Christian recording labels, film production companies, and distribution centers.

Third, the Fundamentalism of the Jazz Age and after developed a fascination with celebrity. Secular celebrities who professed conversion (however vaguely defined) were granted almost automatic status as leaders within popular Fundamentalism. Fundamentalists also developed their own celebrities—sometimes preachers or missionaries, but more often musicians, athletes, or actors.

Fourth, while the parallel culture of Fundamentalism was supposed to protect youth from their popular culture, it had almost the opposite effect. In the eyes of teenagers, the fact that churches made so many concessions to the popular culture meant that it was authorizing that culture. After all, if one could watch movies in church on Sunday night, then why not in the movie theater on Saturday night? If one could listen to the White Sisters, then why not the Andrews Sisters?

Fundamentalists set out to offer an alternative to what they called “worldly entertainment.” In effect, however, they merely offered less of the same. The result was a generation of young people more attuned to popular culture than any of their forebears. Not only that, Christian teenagers became connoisseurs of popular culture—and at some point they realized that what was done amateurishly in the churches was done skillfully by the world. Once they had developed an appetite for amusement and a sense of entitlement to it, it was difficult to keep them from full participation in the popular culture of the day.

Fundamentalism adapted itself to the culture of youth, jazz, and Hollywood. As that adaptation neared its completion, however, yet another cultural shift was beginning in American society. Jazz culture was no longer new, and in some circles it was simply passé. By the mid-1950s, names like Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and especially Elvis Presley had become the harbingers of an entirely new direction. Soon, Fundamentalism would find itself faced with the same dilemma all over again. Would it adapt to the counter-culture of the 1960s or would it abandon its attachment to popular culture?

The answer is that Fundamentalists refused to do either. Instead of either moving ahead or going back, they attempted to hold themselves suspended in mid-air by a sheer act of will. But that is another story for another time.

Prayer for Purity

Nicolaus Ludwig Von Zinzendorf (1700-1760)
Tr. John Wesley (1703-1791)

O Thou, to whose all-searching sight
The darkness shineth as the light,
Search, prove my heart, it pants for Thee,
O burst these bonds, and set it free!

Wash out its stains, refine its dross,
Nail my affections to the Cross;
Hallow each thought; let all within
Be clean, as Thou, my Lord, art clean!

If in this darksome wild I stray,
Be Thou my Light, be Thou my Way;
No foes, no violence I fear,
No fraud, while Thou, my God, art near.

When rising floods my soul o’erflow,
When sinks my heart in waves of woe,
Jesus, Thy timely aid impart,
And raise my head and cheer my heart.

Saviour, where’er Thy steps I see,
Dauntless, untired, I follow Thee;
O let thy hand support me still,
And lead me to Thy holy hill!

If rough and thorny be the way,
My strength proportion to my day;
Till toil, and grief, and pain shall cease,
Where all is calm, and joy, and peace.


This essay is by Dr. Kevin T. Bauder, president of Central Baptist Theological Seminary (Plymouth, MN). Not every professor, student, or alumnus of Central Seminary necessarily agrees with every opinion that it expresses.

Discussion

I appreciate this analysis. There’s a lot of truth in this.

A couple of things I want to “not so fast” about though. The article points out that there was no “secular equivalent” to the youth rally. I think if you really want to find one, you can though. That is, it resembles secular phenomena of the time no more and no less than some of the other “equivalents” listed here. I think some of these “equivalents” are a bit of a stretch and—interestingly—identified mostly by unbelievers who could not be expected to really understand the differences. So I’d suggest the singspiration has no real equivalent either… nor the radio announcer.

What I’ll grant is that these trends were responses to cultural changes and paralleled them in a lot of ways. And I do think the cause & effect chain leading to the whole assumption that church must be entertaining is pretty close to how it happened.

I want to give Fundamentalism credit for 3 things here:

1. Recognizing that the culture needed to be responded to

2. Recognizing that we couldn’t just “take it as it was”.. hence, our “equivalents”

3. Recognizing (though too late) that we couldn’t just continue down the same path (the in-air suspension that is probably the topic of the next piece)

All important stuff to think about, and—I hope will include some suggestions on what to do about it eventually! This is not an easy ball of yarn to reroll.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

Wow, what a piercing, thoughtful, and comprehensive analysis. I was saved at age 17 in January of 1974 and witnessed some of these convergences. I noticed that the “waltz-like” songs of Peterson were very popular with those older than I, but little concession to what was going on at the time, culturally.

My SI friends probably know that I live in the music of the 1920’s and early 30’s; I am even a member of the International Al Jolson Society. Most of the music of that era was decent, but some numbers were ungodly (risque). Still, I think our fundamentalist forefathers made a mistake at that point: we should have embraced SELECTIVE secular participation, teaching our people to think and evaluate, choosing the good, spitting out the bad. Instead of teaching principles, we legislated rules of conformity. Our panic resulted in the trends which Dr. Bauder pointed out.

Instead, we encouraged alienation from all popular culture, no movies, and no “worldly” amusements (a term that could be and still is used in ways that often bypass the brain but, instead, reflect traditional prejudices).

I think Dr. Bauder’s picturesque description is excellent and correct:
Instead of either moving ahead or going back, they attempted to hold themselves suspended in mid-air by a sheer act of will.
I am impressed! Thank you!

"The Midrash Detective"

A contrast to the mainstream interdenominational youth ministry emphasis during the period discussed was the highly visible (and sometimes controversial) ministry of Youth Pastor Don Nelson at Fourth Baptist in Minneapolis from 1957 to 1966. Don’s “Singspirations” were purposely counter to the typical Youth for Christ fare. He eschewed the happy, feel good chourses of the era and focused instead on hymns like “And Can It Be”, “There Is A Fountain”, etc., and Gospel Songs like “At Calvary”, “Redeemed”, “Grace Greater Than Our Sins”, and a host of others.

Don was also counter to the period because he played a guitar — but in a militant cadence that stirred the hearts of young people, completely different from the emerging pop singers of that era. He did not lead in the Cliff Barrows hand waving style, but with the guitar and a line of young people (like the present day worship leaders) leading with their voices. Nobody needed microphones or amplification. As a former missionary to the Far East and WWII vet in the Burma theater, he regaled the young people with his stories of missions in foreign lands “On the Darker Side of the Road” as the words of one of his songs mentioned. These Singspirations were held every Sunday night with 100 to 150 young people attending. The time featured 30-40 minutes of straight singing and then a time of intense testimonies about what God was doing in the lives of the young people.

The Singspiration was only one facet of the youth program. The Saturday Night Youth Club went on every week as an evangelistic outreach. Don’s dictum to the 4th B. youth group was this, “You don’t come to be entertained, but to entertain.” The young people were constantly challenged to bring their unsaved friends on Saturday night. The activities brought droves of young people, and many were converted and then merged into the ongoing program. Every Sunday night, before the evening service, there was a hour-long Youth Chapel that was basically discipleship training and exhortation to Christian living. All of this was in addition to the regular church services and Sunday School. The main criticism of his program was that the kids almost lived at the church or at youth group activities. You couldn’t keep the kids away.

In contrast the big youth rallies featured entertainment, “special singers/musicians” and performance. In many cases kids flocked to the rallies because their local church had nothing going on. The interdenominational youth movements began to criticize the churches for failing to reach young people and that led to conflict. Sadly, in time the churches adopted the methods of the rallies into their local church programs.

Gerry Carlson

Like Ed, I am very impressed with Dr. Bauder’s piece. It offers a well-thought-out analysis of historical events in a way that is cogent and tightly written and yet with enough food for thought that one could comment on it in any one of a 1,000 directions.

I believe that Bauder’s view explains alot about how Fundamentalism developed as it did historically and how it impacted (and was impacted by) popular culture and the development of the youth culture which now saturates the American mentality.

What struck me as I read it was the oddity of how some in the older generations of Fundamentalism might be tempted to draw a line in the sand and “hold the line” for music styles and methodologies which were actually innovative and controversial in their day — not to mention the fact that they were, by definition, somewhat outside the mainstream of historic, orthodox Christian practice.

When Bauder writes, “Instead of either moving ahead or going back, they attempted to hold themselves suspended in mid-air by a sheer act of will,” I am guessing that moving ahead would include adapting to the culture of the ’60s, going back would be a total commitment to Biblical orthodoxy alone and remaining suspended would be the idea of tying Fundamentalism to some vestiges of Victorianism and a longing for the good ol’ days. I will anxiously await to see if I am correct.

Church Ministries Representative, serving in the Midwest, for The Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry

Dr. Bauder, thanks for the interesting history of fundamentalist negotiations with culture. Several times, you describe a motive.
… they created a parallel culture within their own movement: a culture that imitated popular trends while eliminating their most obviously offensive aspects.



Fourth, while the parallel culture of Fundamentalism was supposed to protect youth from their popular culture, it had almost the opposite effect…
How confident we can be in assigning motives? I wonder sometimes whether the motive was protecting the young from the culture or if it was generating an audience for the consumption of their product.

I suppose no one would be so crass as to leave evidence of selfish motives for historians. But what in your study of this history makes you confident in the motive you ascribe?

I think a historian could go back and review fundamentalism’s literature to find their stated intentions and purpose for these programs.

And, I think a historian could rightly evaluate whether the fundamentalists attained their stated goals. Something tells me there is a pretty big gap between what they were trying to accomplish and what actually occurred. Or maybe it was a case of unintended consequences.

By the way, Dan, nice profile picture. Did you ever write anything about the adoption? Fun story.

I was born in ‘69.

The Peterson hymnbook was my church hymnbook all the way through to my heading off to college - 1988. My teen years bounced around between youth rallies and Sunday evening singspirations. These are the experiences of my 80s youth fundamentalism in Idaho.

_____

Our church plant started with the Peterson hymnbook in the year 1995. In the year 2000, we switched to the Majesty Hymnal. Wouldn’t Bauder love to be with us right now? (chuckling)

But how is this for an interesting mix in 2010 … Peterson, Patch the Pirate, RUF tunes, and Sovereign Grace sounds.

_____

Of course, the popular evangelical sounds of worship today are Calvary Chapel, K-Love, Air 1, etc. A conservative Baptist pastor rooted in pop culture of today would be someone like Mark Hall of Casting Crowns.

It looks like three more names have been placed this week on the “Bauder Blacklist:” Al “Mr. Singspiration” Smith, Jack Wyrtzen, and John W. Peterson. They join such notables as Billy Sunday and Homer Rodeheaver.

I wonder what Dr. Bauder thinks of Ron Hamilton?

Cauthorne, I have a whole shelf of hymnals and chorus books … all dated from the mid 1800s to the 1950s. I categorize many of the songs in the fun category (even Hamilton).

For theology songs, I consider from the 1700s back to the Psalter. But there are men putting good theology to music, today.

Not only that, Christian teenagers became connoisseurs of popular culture—and at some point they realized that what was done amateurishly in the churches was done skillfully by the world.

I think every thinking teenager knows this about contemporary Christianity, especially in regards to the music used for fun.

The Music and Musicians Dr. Bauder mentions are indicative of a philosophy. The creating of an alternative culture basically espoused resisting temptation by being SEPARATE from the world.

The point worth noting is that before the Jazz Age, being separate from the world meant not embracing the world’s (godless society’s) value system. Phil. 4:8 encouraged Christians to distinguish between the good and bad in the world; the fundamentalist movement reduced Phil. 4:8 to talk of Bible study.

Godly Christians were no longer to listen to secular popular music at all; instead, they could completely replace it with Christian (or classical) music.

From the perspective of those who pushed such things, it seemed completely reasonable, and I have no doubt their motives were pure. I would have been in their number. I think it is in retrospect we see what we have done, namely, we have removed the Christian influence from popular culture and eliminated the concept of discerning participation.

"The Midrash Detective"

C.D,

What do you disagree with in Bauder’s analysis?

Roger Carlson, Pastor Berean Baptist Church