Review: "The Hole in Our Holiness"
[amazon 1433533340 thumbnail]
Reposted, with permission, from Theologically Driven.
A few months ago I expressed some fairly strong reservations about a nefarious variation of “Gospel-Centered” sanctification that has captured the attention of a number of conservative evangelical luminaries—a preach-the-Gospel-to-yourself, squeeze-your-eyes-tight-and-think-really-hard-about-justification method of propelling oneself to holiness without any discipline, self-denial, effort, or obedience (cuz that’s how them legalists do sanctification).
In this post, I’d like to put on a happy face and make a positive recommendation of an accessible, contemporary, evangelical work that captures a much more holistic picture of the Bible’s teaching on sanctification—a book that does not neglect the motivating role of justification in personal holiness, but one that concentrates more promisingly on regeneration as the energy that fuels personal holiness.
In his book The Hole in Our Holiness, Kevin DeYoung argues that the Gospel involves more than a new standing in Christ; it also involves a new creation. And when we emphasize the former to the neglect of the latter, personal holiness inevitably suffers. This is the hole in our holiness. It starts as a noble effort to rid justification of every vestige of good works, but expands to “assume that good works will invariably flow from nothing but a diligent emphasis on the gospel,” and culminates in a bad case of “nomophobia” or the fear of laws (p. 55). People with this disorder, DeYoung suggests, “make every imperative into a command to believe the gospel more fully … and faith becomes the one thing we need to be better at. If only we really believed, obedience would take care of itself. No need for commands or effort.”
The problem with this approach, DeYoung asserts on the same page, is that “the Bible does not reason this way. It has no problem with the word ‘therefore.’ Grace, grace, grace, therefore, stop doing this, start doing that, and obey the commands of God. Good works should always be rooted in the good news of Christ’s death and resurrection, but I believe we are expecting too much from the ‘flow’ and not doing enough to teach that obedience to the law—from a willing spirit, as made possible by the Holy Spirit—is the proper response to free grace.”
As a dispensationalist I would quibble with DeYoung’s “third use of the Mosaic Law” as something that continues in the present dispensation. But as DeYoung himself points out, we agree in principle that there exists a transcendent law of God that functions most emphatically as a manifest guide for Christian behavior. It is a guide that instructs us to mortify sin, to put off the old and put on the new, to fight the good fight, to strive, to run, to discipline the body, to press forward and strain, to make every effort, to toil, to struggle with all our energy, to conquer, and to overcome (pp. 88–89). And where do we find the energy for this monumental effort? We find the energy in our new life in Christ! By means of definitive sanctification and new birth God has broken the grip of total depravity and rendered us capable of walking in holiness—not perfection, mind you, but real holiness nonetheless. And so we are called upon to become what we are (chap 7).
So what does this look like? Firstly, it involves the full use of the ordinary means of grace (prayer, reading Scripture, and the regular celebration of our union with God’s people and with Christ himself in the rites and functions of the local church). And secondly, it involves me constructing a plan to avoid sin and cultivate holiness in the peculiar milieu where I live and work. To illustrate the latter, DeYoung singles out the pervasive problem of sexual immorality and constructs a biblical strategy for avoiding it. His strategy (all of chapter 8), easily the best short treatment I have ever seen on this topic, is directed especially to an unmarried, late-teen/twenty-something audience. If you are in this category or are a parent of someone in this category, buy the book and read this chapter without delay (but preferably the whole book, too).
In the interest of full disclosure, I have a handful of minor quibbles with DeYoung’s work (e.g., his use of the Mosaic Law mentioned above and also his curious emphasis on “positional” sanctification in chaps 6–7 that in some ways undercuts his major argument even as he makes it). But in all, this book offers an extremely fine alternative to the “Gospel-Centered” (or more accurately, the “justification-only”) model that threatens the modern evangelical movement with premature death by nomophobia.
Mark Snoeberger Bio
Mark Snoeberger is Associate Professor of Systematic Theology at Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary and has served as Director of Library Services since 1997. He received his M.Div. and Th.M. from DBTS and earned a Ph.D. in systematic theology from Baptist Bible Seminary in Clarks Summit, PA. Prior to joining the DBTS staff, he served for three years as an assistant pastor.
- 17 views
Good review. I am glad to know about this book, which is much needed in our present climate. I wonder why Jerry Bridges classic, “The Pursuit of Holiness” failed to correct the present errors regarding sanctification which this book addresses.
I have great sympathy for Snoeberger’s rejection of the Reformed “third use” of the Mosaic Law, but I struggle with certain aspects. If we have only the New Testament Scriptures to command and guide us, how do we know that bestiality or pedophilia are wrong?
Thanks to all at SI for such a helpful forum for profitable discussion.
G. N. Barkman
how do we know that bestiality or pedophilia are wrong?
Because all sexual activity is to be between a man and a woman who are married to each other (1 Cor 6; 1 Thess 4; multitudes of other passages), which precludes both animals and children, not to mention same-sex partners, polygamy, bigamy, etc.
Mr. Barkman, I wouldn’t restrict the transcendent law of God to the specific commands of the New Testament. Many OT commands reflect timeless and universal principles that remain in effect irrespective of what dispensation one is in. The trick, of course, is coming up with a grid to identify these.
MAS
JVDM, in using the phrase “means of grace” I am using DeYoung’s categories.
At the same time, without opening a very long and technical discussion about Reformed sacraments vis-a-vis Baptist ordinances (the latter which I most carefully affirm), it is demonstrable that there is a general sense in which sanctifying grace is administered in the mutual interaction and communion of God’s people (e.g., Eph 4:29). Certainly there is no redemptive or justifying grace in the sacraments in the sense of completing what was lacking in Christ’s sacrifice, but that doesn’t mean that grace cannot accrue to a believer via the fellowship of God’s people.
MAS
[Mark Snoeberger]Mark,Mr. Barkman, I wouldn’t restrict the transcendent law of God to the specific commands of the New Testament. Many OT commands reflect timeless and universal principles that remain in effect irrespective of what dispensation one is in. The trick, of course, is coming up with a grid to identify these.
Thanks for interacting on this thread. Any suggestions on forming such a grid?
Why is it that my voice always seems to be loudest when I am saying the dumbest things?
Great job Mark. Regarding the grid, McCune offered us a grid in systematic that went something like this. The use of the OT Law is valid when it is based on the unchanging attributes/character traits of God, rooted in the created order, repeated and or adjusted in the NT, and presentsd no fundamental dispensational conflict.
Pastor Mike Harding
I’m of the opinion that recent decades have seen a recovery of the truth that the Gospel is for Christians, too, not just for the unsaved. But the pendulum has swung too far in some circles, so I’m grateful for correctives like DeYoung’s.
M. Scott Bashoor Happy Slave of Christ
Discussion