Book Review: The Hurting Parent: Help and Hope for Parents of Prodigals

[amazon 0310286611 thumbnail]

Margie Lewis should know how it feels to be the parent of a prodigal. She is one of them. Co-written with her son Greg Lewis, The Hurting Parent gives hope and encouragement to the parents of prodigals. In this updated edition the Lewises tell the rest of the story of Margie’s son Mark, her prodigal.

In chapter one Lewis recounts the hurt and shame as well as the questions that bombarded their hearts when they realized that they had a prodigal son who had left them. Mark was in college and nearing the end of the semester when he left with almost no trace. When he was found, he wanted nothing to do with his family. So many questions go through one’s mind at times such as this. But Lewis writes, “It is not the purpose of this book to try to answer the ‘What did I do wrong?’ or ‘Why did this happen to us?’ questions…. [Parents] need to know ‘Where do I go from here? What can be done?’” (p. 29).

Chapter two deals with something that even those who are not parents of prodigals should consider: the feelings of isolation that parents of prodigals experience. It is natural to feel left out when others speak glowingly of all that their children are doing and doing well. It is natural to feel completely alone. Sometimes people pull away from these hurting parents, too, not knowing how to deal with them. Hurting parents need help and support. “Many hurting parents have talked to me about the isolation of their shame.” The Lewises add,

Shamed parents use similar words and expressions to describe the feeling: embarrassment, humiliation, inferiority, incompetence, disgrace, loss of face. Often they express fear of rejection, disrespect, disapproval, contempt, and even pity from the people around them who witness their struggles. (p. 33)

Because hurting parents so often feel isolated and ashamed, they need others to let them know that they are not alone. They need the fellowship of other believers who will be there for them, support them, hold them up, listen to them, and pray for them.

Lewis gives the example of “Eric” who is a counselor and the father of a prodigal daughter. At a conference where he spoke about love, Eric felt led to speak of his own struggles with his straying daughter. It was then that something good happened. “For the next three hours broken people stood to admit honestly their problems and their needs. Dozens of parents like Eric rose to confess their own and their families’ hurts…. It became a sharing supporting fellowship” (p. 44). Sadly, many hurting parents live in isolation with no one who wishes to discuss their problems or help them through their struggles.

One response to a prodigal is to angrily write him out of your life. Apparently, some parents are so hurt that they choose to live their lives as though their prodigal is dead. “Rejection can be a form of retaliation for hurt or humiliation” (p. 61). Often rejection is an expression of one’s attempt to control the prodigal and the situation in which the parent finds himself. “Anger is not a reaction that hurting parents can afford to ignore…any more than we can smother those inward hostilities by pretending we have our feelings under control” (p. 85). This rejection and anger is certainly not a Christian response, yet it is probably a common response. Lewis recommends that parents accept their children by loving them unconditionally. Prodigals know that their parents are hurting and are opposed to their sins. Often the prodigals, too, are hurting and will need someone to help them put their lives back together. An accepting, loving parent can be that someone.

The Lewises also address guilt and forgiveness. Parents are often paralyzed by guilt, wondering what they did wrong, accusing themselves and beating themselves up over their parenting errors. This often leads to self pity and despair. Lewis writes, “If we as guilty, hurting parents are going to experience God’s forgiveness for our sins and mistakes, we must also forgive the children who hurt us. And we should use God for a parental model for that forgiveness” (p. 121). That is indeed wise counsel.

Often parents despair. Lewis contends that we should not give up, but wait and hope. “Our God is a persistent God…He never quits. Knowing that should give us enough faith and hope to keep us doing our part as Christian parents” (p. 152).

Finally, Margie Lewis’ story gives parents of prodigals hope of a happy ending. Through persistent love, effort, and the providence of God, Mark Lewis not only came to Christ and reconciled with his parents, but followed God’s leading into the ministry. He was later called to go to school again at the very place where he had quit school. Mark himself observed, “And so it was that God was restoring the years, using the decades that we were trying to run from him, to prepare us for a ministry many years down the road” (p. 176).

It would be best to end this review with an observation from the author about the nature of the book: “I have intentionally avoided step-by-step solutions because every parent-child problem is so different that any blanket answers would have to be glib and simplistic” (p. 154). Those who appreciate the wisdom of that statement will appreciate the book.


Jason Skipper is 38 years old and trusted Jesus at age 13. He lives with his wife and two adopted children near Amite, LA, where he serves as pastor of Wilmer Missionary Baptist Church.

Discussion

Jason, I wonder if you can elaborate on the author’s comments below.

“Lewis writes, ‘If we as guilty, hurting parents are going to experience God’s forgiveness for our sins and mistakes, we must also forgive the children who hurt us. And we should use God for a parental model for that forgiveness’ (p. 121).” Do they give insight into what this looks like? In other words, do they recognize that God’s parenting model shows Him as eager and ready to forgive as He watches and waits for the prodigal to repent/return? Or do they instead recommend the “therapeutic model” of forgiveness?

“Lewis recommends that parents accept their children by loving them unconditionally.” Do they offer any insight into what, exactly, that looks like? What does “accept their children” actually mean? If, for example, my married son cheats on and leaves his wife, what does “accept” him involve?

Incidentally, I’m not asking for everyone on SI to offer their opinions on these questions. I’m just wanting to know if the Lewises flesh out the above remarks.

It appears that as with all rough waters, trying to explain or provide details and step-by-step instructions (as the author stated) on how each case is to be navigated is unrealistic and impossible. I have not read the book and cannot critique its overall value but there are some outstanding principles that he clearly elevates which often you find rejected by many who instruct others in the Word regarding parental administration and relationships with combative and rebellious children. It appears he is appealing to the supreme idea of parental consistency.

I beleive this book is a reprint of an earlier edition. About 20 years ago, it was one of the books that propped us up during a challenging time. We must realize that “we are raising equals” and that our children will make independent decisons. A friend of ours talked about “no regret parenting.” We do the best we know in how to apply Scripture as we raise our children, but we cannot program them, and they are individually accountable to God for their choices. I would suggest that people use this book to help supplement their personal meditation upon Scripture. Far too often, we load hurting parents with guilt statements like, “If you had only done …” Adam and Eve had a perfect setting and perfect guidance, and still made sinful choices. As we maintain Biblical integrity, let us seek to show “grace and truth”

Dick Dayton

I occasionally encounter parents who’s children have all “turned out well” (at least, as meets the eye) very harshly judge parents who have not seen the same results. It saddens me. Part of the problem is misinterpretation of Prov. 22:6.

At the same time, though, I pretty regularly see or hear about parents who are clearly defaulting on their responsibilities (partly because they have never grasped that they are in charge). But whether parents have done their job well or not, kids are human beings and sinners and make their choices. And parents of kids who have ‘gone bad’ need the love and support of parents who haven’t had that experience—not their condemnation.

BTW, yes, this book is an updated edition of the 80’s version.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

Aaron, You are right about so many parents who do not accept responsiblity. They push their job off on the Sunday School, youth group, or school. God still calls parents, and fathers in particular, to be the primary teachers and guidance to children. Far too many Christian parents are chasing the “American Dream” of external success, or their own personal interests, rather than parenting. In our area, there was a billboard campaign asking “Is it good for the kids ?” Kids are not the center of the home. For believers, the Lord is to be the center of the home, then our kids understood that I loved them, but rated their mom ahead of them. Raising kids is hard work, but we enjoyed the process. On most significant decisions, we tried to ask, “How will this impact them in their life and walk with God ?” Also, your comment about Proverbs 22:6 is right. It is not a “computer program guarantee” Another book that might be useful, if it is still in print, is “Exposing The Myths Of Parenthood” by David Jeremiah.

Dick Dayton

I see a combination of teaching and restraining as key. That is, some views on parenting out there these days emphasize ‘heart’ a great deal and seem to devalue the good old fashioned “you’ll do that over my dead body” parenting. But the latter is ultimately not worth very much if the child doesn’t at some point arrive at personal convictions about things. In the end, as somebody said, we’re raising equals (though not equals until unequal for a good while first).

But I’m a firm believer in the way behavior (even without understanding or agreement) shapes the heart. The dynamic is two-way. Heart shapes choices, but also choices shape the attitudes and affections. So I do not shy away from my telling my kids “because I said so” sometimes (can usually do better than that though!). Sometimes we have to acquire a habit first then understand what it means later.

Anyway, just wanted to elaborate on what I meant by parents defaulting on responsibilities. Because I’m not in a position to see what they are doing teaching-wise, what I see more often is the lack of authoritative parenting, which also is shaping the heart.

Because I have a high view of the church, I believe it is the best place for believers to learn a great many things, including kids.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

Bryan,

Very good question. Sorry it has taken me so long to get to you on it.

If I recall correctly, Lewis is speaking of not holding grudges against the children for tarnishing the family image, embarrassing the parents, etc. as well as being willing and ready to embrace the repentant prodigal.

I hope that helps.
[BryanBice] Jason, I wonder if you can elaborate on the author’s comments below.

“Lewis writes, ‘If we as guilty, hurting parents are going to experience God’s forgiveness for our sins and mistakes, we must also forgive the children who hurt us. And we should use God for a parental model for that forgiveness’ (p. 121).” Do they give insight into what this looks like? In other words, do they recognize that God’s parenting model shows Him as eager and ready to forgive as He watches and waits for the prodigal to repent/return? Or do they instead recommend the “therapeutic model” of forgiveness?

“Lewis recommends that parents accept their children by loving them unconditionally.” Do they offer any insight into what, exactly, that looks like? What does “accept their children” actually mean? If, for example, my married son cheats on and leaves his wife, what does “accept” him involve?

Incidentally, I’m not asking for everyone on SI to offer their opinions on these questions. I’m just wanting to know if the Lewises flesh out the above remarks.

Jason

[Jason L. Skipper] Bryan,

Very good question. Sorry it has taken me so long to get to you on it.

If I recall correctly, Lewis is speaking of not holding grudges against the children for tarnishing the family image, embarrassing the parents, etc. as well as being willing and ready to embrace the repentant prodigal.

I hope that helps.
Jason:

Because of your review & because I know far too many hurting parents, I got the book myself, hoping it would be a suitable resource. I haven’t read the whole thing yet, but did read the chapters on acceptance and forgiveness, and find them wanting. Concerning forgiveness, it seems the authors have bought into the therapeutic approach to forgiveness, rather than a biblical one. As far as “acceptance” goes, the concept is not very well defined. I can understand what they’re calling for to a degree, but it’s pretty murky. For example, they give the illustration of the parents whose son “came out” to them one weekend home from college. I can understand that the parents need to accept that their son is responsible for his own decisions, lifestyle, etc. and that their love must not be conditioned on those choices—that they still need to affirm their love for him. The Lewises talk about “accepting” him, even though they can’t approve of his lifestyle. So…how do they show acceptance when he wants to bring his boyfriend home some weekend? Of if he runs off to MA or IA to get “married” to his boyfriend? Probably a more common occurrence these days would be the daughter who’s living with her boyfriend, and wants to bring him home for a weekend. To demonstrate “acceptance,” do Mom & Dad give them the guest room, or insist on separate sleeping arrangements? And how about the child who’s taken to drinking alcohol and is home for summer break from college. Do the parents show acceptance by not objecting to his bringing alcohol into the home? These are the kinds of questions that seem to be left unanswered, at least from what I’ve read thus far.

Bryan,

I would at least keep this in mind while reading: no author can say everything that is necessary in one book. Neither can they say all that they believe.

That being said, I would encourage you to take the good points that are there (which are many) and then modify/improve upon the weaker points so that you can be blessed by both the book and your own personal study.

Perhaps you could post your further thoughts on the issues, too. I would certainly be interested in hearing from you. Honestly, I had the same questions about acceptance that you do, but neglected to insert them into the review due to being pressed for time and unable to included all that came to mind while reading.

Thanks for your comments.

Jason