Why Do We Kill Each Other?
Image
Why do people, both on the political left and right, get so angry that they decide to kill political figures with whom they disagree? Why is it happening in America even more, lately? Why do people murder state lawmakers in Minneapolis, and kill Christian political activists in Utah, and nearly succeed in slaying presidential candidates—all in the past 15 months?
Sure, “sin” is a cheap answer. It’s a good Sunday School answer, but it’s still a safe and lame answer. What is causing human sinfulness to show itself in this way? It’s because we let political passions become our life. That’s very bad.
I was at work in the Attorney General’s Office when everyone’s phones buzzed with the word—Charlie Kirk had just been shot in the neck. Given the nature of the wound and the likelihood that a gunman with a rifle had done the deed, I immediately suspected Kirk would perish.
- A lady at work danced a little jig in the hallway and celebrated: “Charlie Kirk was shot!” she sang.
- Another shook her head grimly. “Poetic justice,” she murmured.
- I have a dear friend whose brother-in-law, upon hearing the news, immediately descended into his basement and began cleaning his rifle, eyes glued to Fox News, as he declared: “We’re at war!”
Each of these are twisted responses from otherwise very pleasant people. They are not good responses. And yet, how many bible-believing Christians would have similarly bad responses if they heard, right now, that Hillary Clinton had been shot? Too many Christians would react quite badly. They might even dance a little jig themselves or smile satisfied little smiles.
It’s clear that, for too many people in America—including way too many Christians—political passions have burrowed deep into our hearts … like parasites.
- We know this because a dark, satisfied nastiness bursts out of some of us (a la Aliens) when bad things happen in society.
- At best, these passions are often tied to moral issues in the political arena.
- At worst, they spring from a fierce patriotism that has gone off the rails into de facto hatred of political adversaries.
- For a Christian, passions this deep about temporal issues are very bad and very wrong.
But the bible does tell us the right way to think about evil, and the evil things people do, in this world.
The Wheat and the Weeds
This is one of the few parables where Jesus identifies the true referent for every character in the story; you have (1) a farmer, (2) an enemy, (3) a wheat crop, and (4) a bunch of weeds. The setup is simple; a farmer sows seed but it turns out bad!
That sucks, obviously. Something must be done. The field was supposed to be one thing, but now it’s a hot mess. The servants think they should go clean it up—why not go and rip out the weeds (Mt 13:27-28)?
What does Jesus think?
He says no. He says the field will never be cleansed until the harvest—Jesus will give orders to sort it all out then. But, for now, just leave it alone—let the weeds and the wheat all grow together. If they try to pick out the weeds now, they’ll just rip out a whole bunch of wheat. Better to leave it (Mt 13:29-30).
This is an intriguing story, so much so that the disciples wanted to hear Jesus explain it once they had a chance to speak to Him alone (Mt 13:36-39).
He answered, “The one who sowed the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world, and the good seed stands for the people of the kingdom. The weeds are the people of the evil one, and the enemy who sows them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels,” (Mt 13:37-39).
Jesus has now explained all the referents:
|
kingdom of heaven |
→ |
this scenario of events |
|
farmer |
→ |
Son of Man = Jesus |
|
field |
→ |
world |
|
good seed ≈ wheat |
→ |
people of kingdom |
|
weeds |
→ |
people of evil one |
|
stealthy enemy |
→ |
devil |
Pay particular attention to the field—what is it? Jesus says it’s the world, and this “field” boasts two crops which are growing side by side—the “people of the kingdom” and “people of the evil one.” This battlespace is simple—two opposing kingdoms, each with its own commanding officer, each with its own followers, inhabiting the same territory. This war will resolve when the “harvesters” arrive, whom Jesus identifies as angels.
He explains:
As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. The Son of Man will send out his angels, and they will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil. They will throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Whoever has ears, let them hear (Mt 13:36-43).
This “field” that is our world will remain a mess until “the end of the age.” The harvesters will fix the field when Jesus sends them. But notice that Jesus now calls the “field” the “kingdom”—He says the angels “will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil.” The field is both the world and the kingdom.
- This suggests Jesus sees the world—this present battlespace—as transitioning into His kingdom at the decisive moment in the future when He intervenes.
- It’s as if “this world” is the territory at issue throughout history, and Jesus views it as already His, and judgment is (in part) Him sweeping evil out of His lands forever.
“Then,” He promises, “the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father” (Mt 13:43). Why? Because the “weeds” will be gone, and the “wheat” will finally be free to flourish in the field (i.e., “the kingdom of their Father”) without an invasive species choking them.
Jesus’ kingdom is here, right now. It’s in this world in the form of a dispersed community in exile in a hostile land. This situation will remain that way until the end of the age (cf. the parable of the net at Mt 13:47-50)—it’s why Jesus said this whole parable, the entire state of affairs it sketched, “is like” the kingdom of heaven. As one early Christian discipleship manual said, “There are two ways, one of life and one of death, and there is a great difference between the two ways” (Didache, 1.1).
This suggests:
- The world is a messed up place.
- It will continue to be a messed up place until the end.
- No politician, influencer, or movement will ever fix that.
So, be interested in politics if you want. But, you’re making a terrible mistake if you give yourself to it—if you spend your life, passions, and energy trying to put lipstick on the pig that is this world via a utopian moral revolution or political victory. In other words, Christians who do that are trying to do this:
They’re trying to, as it were, “rip up the weeds” and purify the field that is this hot mess of a world.
- It won’t work.
- You’re wasting your time.
- The angels will handle that bit.
- Leave them to it.
- This present evil age will not end until “Babylon” is destroyed and Jesus returns (Rev 18:21-24).
History teaches us that so-called “victories” in the political realm rarely last—even when their champions are Christians and Christian-adjacent ideologues. Think of William F. Buckley, Jr.
- Perhaps more than anyone else, he created the ideological network that re-birthed the political conservative movement in America through his National Review magazine and his long-running interview show Firing Line.
- From Herbert Hoover’s disgrace until the election of Ronald Reagan (excepting Nixon, who was not exactly a shining light for the cause), “true” conservatism was shut out of the White House … until it wasn’t.
- Buckley did that.
Yet how many young people today know his name, his achievements, or have watched just one of his 1500-ish Firing Line interviews?
- Not so many, because the cycle has begun again.
- Old victories are forgotten.
- Lessons learned have faded.
- Once more the country is at risk “as never before.”
- And so it goes—the song remains the same.
Solomon asks us: “Is there anything of which one might say, ‘See this, it is new’? It has already existed for ages which were before us” (Ecc 1:10).
- Buckley did not fix America.
- Reagan did not fix America.
- Charlie Kirk would not have fixed America, had he lived.
- Trump will not fix America.
- America has no future in eternity.
Many of the things political conservatives and Christians are angry about will not be fixed until Babylon falls. The apostle John shows us a vision of a sexy call-girl as the public face of the “beast” which is the fearsome monster that is Satan’s kingdom (Rev 17). She offers herself to everyone—to take her is to accept the Satan’s deception, his values, his kingdom (Rev 17:2).
- Jesus tells us that, until the angels pull up to the curb to reap the harvest, the prostitute will still be there, offering drinks to everyone, and most people will continue taking it.
- If you let yourself descend into a hellhole of anger about politics and news—whether you’re on the left or the right—then you’re taking drinks from the Babylonian prostitute, too.
- Satan wants you to lose perspective, to focus on the “now,” to be angry, to speak of “war,” to hate “the other side.”
- He wants you to be more passionate about America and domestic politics than about Jesus—because those are two very different things.
- Screwtape has probably written many letters on the subject to his young nephew!
The church in America has one primary mission—and it isn’t to save America or to keep polishing brass on a sinking ship. If we give ourselves to that, if we forget Jesus’ lesson in our parable, if we define true “success” in Christian mission as executive orders, legislation, and judicial rulings, then we’re wasting our time—because the cycle will always repeat.
- There will always be another “battle.”
- Another “hero” to celebrate and follow.
- Another new and “exciting” movement to effect “change.”
- More political fodder for more political outrage. We live in a sinful world—who would have thought?
And nobody will remember the last cycle (again, see Buckley). But it won’t matter, because the new cycle is beginning!
And so it goes.
The church’s job is to tell people about Jesus, and to show him to the world by our changed lives.
- We’re here to get people to defect and walk away from Babylon and join the Jesus family.
- We’re here to represent Jesus, and Jesus isn’t about America.
- He has his own kingdom that’s coming, and it’s a whole lot better than this one.
Tyler Robbins 2016 v2
Tyler Robbins is a bi-vocational pastor at Sleater Kinney Road Baptist Church, in Olympia WA. He also works in State government. He blogs as the Eccentric Fundamentalist.
Tyler, your mentioning William F. Buckley brings to my mind numerous memories of him in my earlier years. At age 62, I remember his influence well. At around age 20, I read God and Man at Yale. I found it fascinating, both for its dissection of the mid-twentieth century academic status quo and the backlash it generated. McGeorge Bundy, just a few years older than Buckley, published a scathing response in which he made little attempt to curtail his anger that this young, upstart fellow-alumnus had the effrontery to critique their alma mater. Buckley seems in certain ways to me to have been a philosophical progenitor of Charlie Kirk. Neither one shied away from dialogue.
What is causing human sinfulness to show itself in this way?
This is an astute question and not one enough are asking. I would append “and at this time?”
And I agree that various flavors of hyperpoliticization are a huge factor.
Also, though, Christians—well all humans, but especially Christians—are supposed to work for the betterment of their fellow humans and ‘society’ as part of that effort. In addition, we have the image of God to live out and reflect His glory in that way. It’s about His glory, and the mission of the church is a subset of that. “Love God… love your neighbor” is all for the glory of God.
We are supposed to try to make a difference in this temporary broken order.
At the same time, the danger of making politics our all is huge these days.
At the moment, as far as Christians and churches are concerned, I see two major sets of factors:
- The emphasis problem: a matter of balance
- The strategies and methods problem: a matter of looking at the whole thing through a different lens in the first place.
That second bullet isn’t about finding a good place between a couple of extremes. It’s a lot more than that. I don’t think “strategies and methods” covers it, but it’s what I have for a term just now.
Maybe the simplest way to put it is that too many of those trying to do culture war are apparently not thinking it through. They don’t seem to be asking questions like:
- What if “our” current political dominance doesn’t last forever?
- What precedents are we setting that are going to make everything a lot worse when the pendulum swings the other way?
- What sort of message are we communicating by our methods?
- Along with the ‘what’ we are saying, what is the message tagging along in ‘how’ we say it?
- What sort of message is actually being received relative to what we think we are communicating?
- How are humans actually persuaded to believe things in a somewhat durable way?
- What does history teach us about the use of coercion in place of persuasion?
Well, the list goes on.
As for balance, I may have swung the other way. I used to be really interested in the cause of conservatism and the struggle to restrain modern liberalism, etc. But the fight shifted to two dominant factions that are both so full of problems, I’ve become pretty uninterested in the whole mess. Wake me up when there is a reasonably coherent version of conservatism to get behind.
Meanwhile, where most of us live our everyday lives, there is still plenty of opportunity to love our neighbors on the small scale of personal interactions. In the long run, like in eternity, those might be what matters most.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
My perspective may credibly be called Anabaptist-lite. I basically see the church’s job as being to preach and live out the gospel, while the government leaves all faiths alone so each can have its place in the public square. I don’t advocate a withdrawal from society, but rather a detachment from full-on investment in temporal things.
I like my job and am good at it, but it isn’t my life. My family is infinitely more important. That’s the way we ought to think about our country. It’s good, but it isn’t our life—Christ is our life.
So, while you can work to make society “better” if you wish, know that you will never really “achieve” anything that has permanence in that sphere. That should inform at what setting we peg our “passion meters” for these matters.
I discuss this is some depth in a long essay here, if anyone wants more info. I spent a great deal of time there trying to anchor this perspective in bible passages—especially Revelation, which I lacked the space to do here.
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
I don't know if this was your intent, Tyler, but when I saw the headline, James 4 immediately came to mind, and it strikes me that we're in a place where, yes, we kill and covet because we do not ask God. And all too often, when we do ask, we do not receive because it is because of our own lusts that we ask.
It also troubles me that in the AG's office, you observed several people apparently celebrating a murder because the victim was politically opposed to them. That suggests that many crime victims/accused are going to have trouble getting fair justice if they're seen as "on the wrong side of the political tracks", and that further means that those who perceive themselves as "on the wrong side of the political tracks" are going to try to solve some of these things ourselves.
I.e. Balkans in Seattle.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
I don’t work in the criminal division. The lady who danced has an administrative role, and (to be fair) nobody yet knew Kirk was dead at the time.
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
Even in the civil division, behavior like that is cause for someone to at least pull the offender aside and say "Hey, if you're doing that kind of thing as an employee here, people our office works with are going to reasonably doubt you're giving them a fair shake. Knock it off.".
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
Both sides of the aisle have dug into deep ideaological frameworks. They are resistant to give in to anything that falls outside of these frameworks and they view the other side as dangerous. Trump complains that "woke" is killing the nation and Schumer complains that the right are facists. Social media has not only amplified these ideological divides, but the algorithms continue to feed reinforcing narratives into the minds of most Americans. Young people are even more susceptible, not only from their behaviors of constant scolling, but also because their minds are not as developed. Before the age of 25, the prefrontal cortex has not developed enough to provide the level of self control over an overactive Amygdala.


Discussion