A Report on the IFCA Annual Convention (Part 3)

.

Thanks, Paul, for this report of the convention.

Thanks for sharing the video links, Paul. I’ve enjoyed listening to several of them as I’ve traveled on vacation recently. I always appreciate hearing Larry Pettegrew and Tommy Ice speak.

Listening to the panel critique CRT and Social Justice as well as Gilley’s workshop on the Social Gospel, along with reading every Panel member’s articles about CRT and Social Justice in their IFCA Periodical “Voice” https://www.ifca.org/file/2ef529c0-e970-11eb-9a41-239c885721a6 was quite painful. Not because they communicated profound Biblical truth to the subject, but rather they displayed such willful ignorance about CRT and Social Justice. If you’d like, I can break down each article and explain how they are wrongly diagnosing CRT and Today’s Social Justice. Many fundamentalist and conservative evangelical leaders and pastors rightly realize something is wrong with CRT and society’s version of Social Justice, but they often get the prognosis wrong.

But that’s what happens when one doesn’t engage primary sources about the CRT and Social Justice, but rather secondary sources from “discernment bloggers and preachers who have benefited from building a huge platform by being anti-CRT, anti-SJ, and anti-Woke. What’s terrible is that it’s not just that they are quoting Jon Harris (an admitted confederate Southern Baptist that wrote “when Social Justice comes to church) or Owen Strachan who constantly uses hasty generalizations, cherry-picking, appeal to motives, false dilemmas to build a giant straw man to beat down. But that Voddie Baucham’s book “Fault Lines” was lifted up as the “best book on the subject.”

Sadly Voddie, in describing CRT from Richard Delgado’s book, Critical Race Theory, attributes false quotations to Delgado that Delgado didn’t actually say in his book. For example, As part of Delgado describing “Convergence Theory,” Voddie added this line to the quote even though Delgaldo never said it. “This means whites are incapable of righteous actions on race and only undo racism when it benefits them, when their interests converge with the interests of people of color.” https://www.lambsreign.com/blog/voddies-fault-lines-worse-than-before-fake-quotations-and-plagiarism He also plagiarized James Lindsay in the book. This is a no-no, especially for someone who is the Dean of Faculty and Dean of Theology at a Christian University.

When you create fake quotes that a CRT author didn’t say to make them sound worse than they really are, you are breaking the 9th commandment of Bearing False Witness. Even as this has come out in the past week or so, the Founders Group and other conservative Christians who embrace and give Voddie a huge platform have been predictably silent. I find it interesting that when socio-political issues are involved, truth-telling matters less and less (even for conservative evangelicals and fundamentalists). I guess we’re all post-modern now (not just the progressive liberals).

Well, I haven’t listed to any of the IFCA sessions, but I certainly agree that CT and CRT should be attacked based on what they really are, rather than caricatures of them. And plagiarizing and misquoting are indeed indefensible, as you have noted. There are those (like Neil Shenvi) who, at least as far as I can tell, get it right, and give plenty of reasons that CT/CRT should be rejected. What’s true about CT/CRT is bad enough. When we have the truth, we don’t need to make stuff up.

I think Neil Shenvi is a voice that needs to be heard and I have benefited from several of his articles and book reviews. He often asks very good probing questions (especially in his book reviews) and does not dismiss the idea of systemic racism in America. He also will alter his views in response to his critics if he was wrong about an author of CRT. That shows humility. I also like how he differentiates between prescriptive white privilege and descriptive white privilege.

Where I differ from Shenvi is when he will broad-brush CRT at times, especially in his attempt to prove that CRT has a common anti-Christian worldview. Questions such as “Who is God?; Who am I?; What’s my purpose for living?; What is real?; Who determines right from wrong?; and What happens after I die? to be asked or answered. That is not where CRT’s interests lie. CRT is much more concerned with the racial inequality of laws in the history of America and how that affects our country today. However, there are some folks/scholars who have made CRT more of.a worldview, but that happened later as the people attached other sociological theories/aspects to CRT. For example, Patricia Hill Collins’ Intersectionality (Key Concepts) assumes a very progressive secular worldview, much of which is anti-Christian. However, she also admits that Intersectionality is an analytical tool that can be used by anyone including right-wing political groups or even racist groups like the KKK although she bemoans both group types for utilizing it. Because Shenvi is a pretty good amateur apologist, he is going to see things more through worldview lens, but sometimes it leads to creating overly simplistic categories.

In many ways, Shenvi is addressing the populist “Velveeta cheese” versions of CRT, more of an imitation, processed variant than the scholarly real thing.

Back in March, former editor of Christianity Today Ed Stetzer invited about 10-12 scholars/knowledgeable Christians to write small essays about CRT on the church leaders website, this included Shenvi and his partner/writer Dr. Pat Sawyer. I really like some of Sawyer’s stand alone writings on CRT. He still heavily critiques it, but not from the apologist angle. Unfortunately, they must’ve taken the essays off the internet because links that I saved no longer exists.

FWIW, James Lindsay apparently doesn’t believe that Baucham is guilty of plagiarizing him.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1422620109957476353