Limping Forward
By C. L.
I walk with a limp, and consequently, the pastor fired me.
I gained this limp on the first of July, exactly one year from the day I had joined the staff of Berean Baptist Church. That first year had been a great start to my short career as a music minister. Fresh out of school, I was a good match for Berean Baptist. The congregation welcomed me warmly, the choir grew quickly, and the pastor considered me the finest music minister he’d ever worked with in his thirty-plus years of ministry.
But then came the limp. On Friday night, July 1, 1994 I broke my spine. The details involve a family reunion, an old trampoline, and the sound of shattering vertebrae in my ears that faded quickly, replaced by my own voice, mid-scream. No feeling from the waist down, but an inferno of pain engulfing all the nerves that remained online. After the spinal swelling subsided, the surgeons installed two nine-inch steel rods and fused the ruined bones together. They put me in a wheelchair and shuttled me off to rehab. The people of my church prayed and prayed. In a true season of miracle, God moved and I walked home one month after the accident. Neurological injuries can’t be overcome by hard work or willpower, and there is no medical repair for broken nerve tissue. I walk today because God’s good hand was on me.
He did leave me with a limp.
I started back to work the first Sunday in September, only two months after the accident. The church applauded my rapid return, and my suit hid the shape of the bulky brace strapped around my torso. Outpatient therapy continued for several months. The music program didn’t miss a beat. That year’s Christmas program was one of the best the church had ever enjoyed.
The remnants of my injury are most noticeable in my right foot. I never regained dorsiflexion, the ability to pull that foot up or “let off the gas.” The deficiency is most evident when I play the piano. To use the sustain pedal, I clomp my whole leg up and down like a horse keeping time to the tune. Otherwise, it’s not a big hindrance to me. I don’t think about it often. It’s other people that notice your limp.
While filling up at a truck stop service station off the interstate, a member of my church watched a man enter an adult bookstore across the street. A man with a limp. It was too far away to recognize the face, but the limp was unmistakable. He’d seen it on the platform the previous Sunday. The concerned member phoned his pastor, who called secret deacon meetings. Within a month, a course of action was plotted. The pastor casually asked me to attend a Thursday night deacon’s meeting. “Just routine business. No biggie.”
I limped into the room to find a chair had been positioned for me, turned to face the group. The chair already looked accused. I took a deep breath and sat down. The pastor read a prepared statement that began, “It has come to our attention that you visited such-and-such establishment located at such-and-such address.” It ended with “you will resign during the Sunday night service this weekend.”
I didn’t try to lie. I told them about previous visits to adult bookstores to view pornography. I told them I was sorry, that I didn’t know what was wrong with me, that I was willing to find help. I asked if could take a leave of absence to sort things out. They refused. I resigned that Sunday night in February of 1995.
Thoughts on Church Discipline
Much is written for the pastor to guide him in proper handling of these situations. But I would like to offer the more rarely heard perspective of the offender. My pastor’s choices had enormous impact on me then, and they continue to mark me today.
Matthew 18:15-17 is often the scriptural blueprint for such interactions, and I’ll use it here as well.
Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother (Matt. 18:15).
My pastor should have confronted me one on one. Inviting me to a deacons’ meeting under false pretenses only established an atmosphere of distrust. It sent the message that this meeting was about controlling me, not confronting me. The outcome of the situation was preplanned and extra hands were there to ensure it. But to discuss the matter “between thee and him alone” leaves room for denial and misunderstanding and accusation. I believe that’s why Christ urged individual confrontation as a first step. It should be scary and unpredictable, so that we confront prayerfully and humbly. This model of one-on-one confrontation makes us vulnerable. Paul describes it as meekness in Galatians 6:1 when he says, “if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness.”
Notice the end of Matthew 18:15. The hope of one-on-one confrontation is “to gain a brother.” When my pastor bypassed this step, he closed the door on a chance for the intimacy confession always brings. Even if he still required that I resign, he could have shepherded me through a difficult journey. Instead, he chose control over vulnerability, leverage over love. He didn’t confront me—he contained me.
But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established (Matt. 18:16).
I appreciate how Jesus carefully expands the sphere of people involved. If individual confrontation is met with denial, include just one or two more when you return. God is aware of a difficult dynamic at play in the heart of the offending brother. Coming to terms with secret sin is usually a process, not a one-time event. That first confrontation may be too scary to admit much of anything. The offender may minimize his sin or deflect blame. He may have lived years in denial within his own heart. So if the initial response to the individual confrontation isn’t mature or complete, don’t assume this is a flat refusal to hear. If you’ve confronted with vulnerability the first time, returning with a compassionate partner or two will bring strength to the confrontation. In an environment of compassion (we care) accompanied by strength (we care enough pursue the truth with you), the offending brother may be willing to come out of hiding.
Have faith that the Spirit of God has worked since your first conversation. Christ ends his thought on this process in Matthew 18:20. “For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.” This often misquoted promise was made in the context of confronting your brother’s sin. Expect Christ to be present in the process.
And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican (Matt. 18:17).
Never is the goal to force confession and remorse. If it were all aimed toward a guilty verdict, the process would move into evidence and eyewitness testimony. The goal is that the church live in truth. If the offender is unable to join them in the truth, he must leave.
After I resigned, I attended Berean Baptist for more than a year. I found other work in the area, sought some professional Christian counseling and quietly became part of the congregation. When a new music minister was hired, I joined the choir. And although the pastor had expressed his commitment to “walk with me through my restoration,” he never asked me how I was doing. Not once. I think he was waiting for me to follow standard church procedure and leave town in shame. He seemed unsure and awkward around me.
But I was finding healing in living in the light, in the place where people knew the worst of me and still shook my hand. My relationships became deep, and those I’d hurt found healing too. I learned what it is to be forgiven. It’s like stepping out of the shadows to let the sun warm your face.
The pastor attempted to control, which is always an illusion at best. Though I had a long way to go, I decided to walk toward truth. In that surrender, I began to experience healing and freedom. In choosing control over surrender, the pastor was left on the outside looking in. Sadly, he was unable to join in the redemption.
Father, thank you for the limp.
- 16 views
I agree that many times sin is allowed to get a grip on us because we are too proud to share our burdens with others, to ask for prayer or counsel, or to step down from leadership when we see we are in over our heads. It is also a problem that we are reluctant to confront or at least inquire when we perceive that someone is giving in to temptation. But isn’t it also a part of the culture of our churches that we accept so much sin in our living rooms every night of the week that you really have to do something nasty to be considered ‘backslidden’?
I’m probably just frustrated by the contradictions I’ve seen on this topic over the years, and the fact that people like CL who are even in positions of authority and influence can struggle with something like this for years undetected… and who knows how many people they’ve affected because they’ve been violating their conscience for so long? Like Lois Lane says to Superman- “You’ve got me? Who’s got you?” We’re supposed to be able to depend on our church leadership for edification and admonition… where does all this permissiveness in a pastor or teacher’s personal life leave the congregation?
I’m just rambling now… too much pasta makes me dopey…
[Rick Franklin]Rick raises good points. In my experience, battles with lust are a persistent, ongoing, unending war. There’s no one that ever gets ‘final victory’ over it…not while they’re alive anyway. MacArthur mentioned a story one time of a Christian that he was visiting [on his deathbed] who was crying because he’d never been able to overcome a porn habit and I believe was well into his 70’s, and MacArthur had no idea of it. I think that’s the experiential norm and not the rule.[Susan R] I think we have to ask “How did CL get as far as he did without seeing his need for repentance, and without his problems being noticed by all his Christian friends?”It’s quite possible that C.L. did see his need for repentance, as Paul alluded to in Romans 7:15-17. Many people, even Christians, struggle with addictions which they want to overcome.
As far as his sin not being noticed by Christian friends, perhaps they saw symptoms but were not aware of the specific sin, and in any event chose not to confront.
As to confession, who exactly should he have gone to? Maybe he didn’t have a strong enough rapport with the pastor to confess and seek help. It’s not like you march into an FBFI meeting, say that you’re addicted to porn, and then get right immediately, and get flooded with supportive, encouraging people. It’s not like that excuses him, but who does pastors the pastor? Ministry is an incredibly lonely place, and I’m not even in full-time ministry [not that there is any such thing as part time pastoring]. Jamie made some good points on this idea as well.
What, exactly, are the outward symptoms of lust? If CL was, for example, hitting websites on the internet at home, how would anyone else know to confront him? It’s not like clearing browser history is all that difficult, and some of the newer browsers offer ‘hiding mode’ which is supposed to guarantee privacy of internet browsing. I wouldn’t know about how that works, but my wife knows how to pull up that kind of stuff if she were ever curious or needed to.
"Our task today is to tell people — who no longer know what sin is...no longer see themselves as sinners, and no longer have room for these categories — that Christ died for sins of which they do not think they’re guilty." - David Wells
[Jay C]Many churches have men’s accountability groups. The one I was involved with had an attendance of 15 - 30, which broke down into groups of two or three after the teaching portion of the meeting.
As to confession, who exactly should he have gone to? Maybe he didn’t have a strong enough rapport with the pastor to confess and seek help. It’s not like you march into an FBFI meeting, say that you’re addicted to porn, and then get right immediately, and get flooded with supportive, encouraging people. It’s not like that excuses him, but who does pastors the pastor? Ministry is an incredibly lonely place, and I’m not even in full-time ministry [not that there is any such thing as part time pastoring]. Jamie made some good points on this idea as well.
[Jay C]C.L.’s story is from 1994 and 1995, the years Netscape and Internet Explorer hit the market. At that time, web browsing was largely limited to geeks. The primary source for feeding his addiction was probably the “adult” book store. If he had been using the internet for his addiction, he may not have been caught.
What, exactly, are the outward symptoms of lust? If CL was, for example, hitting websites on the internet at home, how would anyone else know to confront him? It’s not like clearing browser history is all that difficult, and some of the newer browsers offer ‘hiding mode’ which is supposed to guarantee privacy of internet browsing. I wouldn’t know about how that works, but my wife knows how to pull up that kind of stuff if she were ever curious or needed to.
[Susan R] If indeed we are not supposed to make occasion for the flesh, then what’s with the idea that a man can be a Sunday School teacher, but go watch a movie like http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0971209/ A Perfect Getaway , and everyone (without distinction) thinks that perfectly normal and acceptable? (you can see a review of the content of that movie http://www.kids-in-mind.com/p/perfectgetaway.htm here .Actually, I can’t see that review, because it is blocked by Net Nanny, for which I am thankful. 8-)
Rick Franklin Gresham, Oregon Romans 8:38-39
[Rick Franklin]The website is called Kids in Mind, and it reviews the content of movies, even to how many times profanities and obscenities are used. So if you’re blocked, that should tell you whether or not a man can take his family to see the movie, ya’ think? ;)[Susan R] If indeed we are not supposed to make occasion for the flesh, then what’s with the idea that a man can be a Sunday School teacher, but go watch a movie like http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0971209/ A Perfect Getaway , and everyone (without distinction) thinks that perfectly normal and acceptable? (you can see a review of the content of that movie http://www.kids-in-mind.com/p/perfectgetaway.htm here .Actually, I can’t see that review, because it is blocked by Net Nanny, for which I am thankful. 8-)
[Susan R] The website is called Kids in Mind, and it reviews the content of movies, even to how many times profanities and obscenities are used.Susan alludes to another reason Christians ought not watch very many movies rated worse than G. Intentionally putting yourself in a situation where you’re going to hear a lot of profanities and obscenities puts you in conflict with Philippians 4:8. And there’s a lot of that on television these days as well.
Rick Franklin Gresham, Oregon Romans 8:38-39
Discussion