Jesus and Power Over the Demons (Mark 3:7-19)
Image
Read the rest of the series.
The Pharisees are seeking to kill Jesus, but the demons confess Him as the Son of God. This is a great irony of the Gospels. The leaders who ought to recognize him hate Him. The fallen angels who should hate Him bow before Him. Meanwhile, the people who should gladly receive Him ignore His message.
Power Over the Demons
Jesus withdrew with his disciples to the sea, and a great multitude from Galilee followed; also from Judea and Jerusalem and Idumea and from beyond the Jordan and from about Tyre and Sidon a great multitude, hearing all that he did, came to him (Mk 3:7-8).
After the latest confrontation, Jesus withdraws from Capernaum “to the sea.” We’re not sure where Jesus went, because Capernaum is on the Sea of Galilee. He probably went to a more secluded location along the coast, away from the city.1 It is clear Jesus doesn’t intend to wage a full-out theological assault against the Pharisees. To borrow a military analogy, His confrontation with the Pharisees in the synagogue (3:1-6) is better seen as a strategic raid than a declaration of all-out war. More direct confrontation will only result in a premature arrest, torture and execution. The Father has a divine timetable (cf. Ecc 3:1-8), and Jesus follows it — thus He beats a tactical retreat.2
What a contrast between the Pharisees’ homicidal intent, and the response from the crowds. They come to Him from everywhere; Jews from Jerusalem and Judea, and Gentiles from the south, east and north.3 They come separately, meet together and form one mass of pilgrims.4 John the Baptist didn’t draw this many people (Mk 1:5), and only preached to Israelites (cf. Lk 3:1-17).5 Jesus, on the other hand, indiscriminately preaches to the Gentiles and the Jews. He does not have the racist, exclusivist mindset that is so foreign to the Old Covenant Scriptures, but was so common in His day.6 He truly was a light for the Gentiles (cf. Isa 49:6). Jesus is Jewish, but many Israelites forgot that their Jewish Messiah came to be a Messiah for all people (cf. Lk 2:29-32, Acts 13:46-48).
And he told his disciples to have a boat ready for him because of the crowd, lest they should crush him; for he had healed many, so that all who had diseases pressed upon him to touch him (Mk 3:9-10).
For Jesus, crowds are no indication of success. Then, as now, people often followed Jesus for selfish and unholy reasons. These crowds followed Jesus because they wanted divine healing.
Jesus, always a practical fellow, orders a boat prepared so He can flee, if necessary.7 He’s in danger of being crushed and trampled. In a modern context, Jesus would be preaching on a street-corner in front of the open, sliding door of a minivan, the engine running, a disciple at the wheel!
Mark describes a nearly out of control mob. The scene is at once frightening and exhilarating. Jesus fears being crushed because His healing miracles have incited a frenzy. The mass of people, Jew and Gentile alike, press forward relentlessly, fighting and clamoring to get near. This is very different from the silly stereotype of gentle Jesus, meek mild, teaching the adoring masses from a landscaped hillside while He cradles a lamb in His lap.
These people don’t care what He preaches, what He says, or who He is. They’re pressing forward to touch Him, so they might be healed. He’s a rabbit’s foot, a talisman - somebody who can give them what they want.8 Yet, it is remarkable that Jesus did not angrily send them away. He evidently healed many of them.9
Little has changed. Many people do not seek Christ because they want forgiveness and justification. They seek Jesus because of what He can do for Him. He’s a Cosmic Butler, who lives to serve us.
I recently listened to a sermon from a pseudo-megachurch near my home. It was blasphemy of the worst kind. The message was, “come to Jesus so He can make your life easier, give you a better job, more money and make you happy.” In this church, Jesus’ actual message, His doctrinal content and ethical commands to repent, believe and deny yourself and follow Him, are meaningless. Christ is just a prop for charlatans to hang blasphemy on.
These crowds in Mark’s Gospel are the same. His message is irrelevant to them; they just want healing.10 The implications of that healing are lost on them (cf. Lk 7:18-23, Mk 3:22-27).
And whenever the unclean spirits beheld him, they fell down before him and cried out, “You are the Son of God.” And he strictly ordered them not to make him known (Mk 3:11-12).
The Pharisees are plotting to kill Him. The crowds don’t care what He says. Yet, the demons give Him the glory! Many people in this crowd are demon-possessed. Whenever they see Him, they fall down and literally scream and shriek their confession.
Can you imagine the scene? This is an ongoing event. The crowds press forward, anxious to touch Jesus and be healed. In the midst of this mob, demon-possessed men, women, boys and girls alternatively scream and howl, loudly, that Jesus is the Son of God.11 They do this whenever they catch sight of Him. In the crush of the crowd, they don’t have an unobstructed view. As they catch periodic, fleeting glimpses of the Christ, they scream their confession, despite themselves. They fall down before Him, wherever they are, and confess His identity in the most public way possible.
Demons are fallen angels. Jesus is their creator. He is their ultimate adversary, and His power over the forces of darkness is absolute. Those who have Christ as their King and God as their Lord should respect Satan as a formidable adversary indeed (cf. Jude 9), but they need not wonder how this conflict will end. Satan will lose.
Why does Jesus forbid the fallen angels to make Him known? The text doesn’t say, and a whole lot of ink (and even more kilobytes) have been spilled trying to figure it out. It is clear the true nature of Jesus as Messiah can only be appreciated in light of the Cross, the Resurrection, and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the inauguration of the New Covenant. This is as good an explanation as any for why Jesus commanded the demons to be silent.12
Because He is God and they are not, the unclean spirits obey. What else can they do? This decisive confrontation with the forces of darkness is a prelude to perhaps the key passage about the purpose of His miracles (Mk 3:22-27).
Delegating Authority
And he went up on the mountain, and called to him those whom he desired; and they came to him. And he appointed twelve, to be with him, and to be sent out to preach and have authority to cast out demons: Simon whom he surnamed Peter; James the son of Zebedee and John the brother of James, whom he surnamed Boanerges, that is, sons of thunder; Andrew, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus, and Simon the Cananaean, and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him (Mk 3:13-19).
After Jesus demonstrates such complete mastery over the fallen angels, He delegates this authority to His chosen disciples. They did not choose Him; He chose them.13 This is the church in embryo form; a group of called out believers in Christ, who are sent forth by Christ, bringing His Good News indiscriminately to the wide world beyond.
Jesus appoints twelve:
- To be with him. You cannot be a follower of Christ unless you have fellowship with Him. You cannot have fellowship with Christ unless you believe what the apostles heard, and saw with their eyes, and looked upon and touched with their hands — the truth about Jesus Christ, the word of life (1 John 1:1-4). You learn about this from the books they and others wrote, which tell you all about it (i.e. the New Testament). This implies a community of believers who learn from Christ.
- To preach. This is the point of their community, of their training. They will be sent out to preach and proclaim the message He gives them. The kingdom of God is here! Repent, believe, and join this kingdom!14
- To have authority to cast out demons. The One who has such complete mastery over Satan and His minions also has the authority to delegate this power to His children. This is clearly a divine power and authority.15 And, this power is only meant to accredit the preaching — to prove the kingdom of God has broken into this dark and evil world and vanquished that darkness.
Conclusion
Jesus is God. He has clear and obvious power over the unclean spirits (cf. Mk 1:27). He delegates and dispenses this power to His apostles, and will eventually send them forth as His representatives. The demons see and recognize Jesus’ authority. They scream, fall to the ground and confess His identity at the very sight of him. They obey His commands. They are putty in His hands.
In contrast, we see the Pharisees in Capernaum plotting their little plots. We see the crowd as a near mob of half-crazed pilgrims who seek only physical healing. His own disciples are spiritually dull; their training has only begun. Ironically, only the demons truly give Him the glory. Yet, as they do so, they testify to His divinity, and His co-equal and His co-eternal status with the Father.16 He confirms their testimony in the most appropriate way possible — by silencing them.
We believe that there is one, and only one, living and true God, an infinite, intelligent Spirit, whose name is JEHOVAH, the Maker and Supreme Ruler of Heaven and earth; inexpressibly glorious in holiness, and worthy of all possible honor, confidence, and love; that in the unity of the Godhead there are three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; equal in every divine perfection, and executing distinct and harmonious offices in the great work of redemption.17
Notes
1 See James R. Edwards, The Gospel According to Mark, in PNTC (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002), 103. Ezra Gould also suggests Jesus sought solitude on another portion of the seashore (The Gospel According to St. Mark, in ICC [Edinburgh, UK: T&T Clark, 1896], 55).
2 William Hendriksen observed, “We must bear in mind also that the time for the decisive head-on confrontation with the religious authorities had not as yet arrived. According to the Father’s time-clock Calvary is still some distance away. For the present therefore the seashore is better suited to the Master’s purpose than the synagogue,” (The Gospel of Mark, in NTC [Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1975], 118).
James Brooks, however, suggests “probably it refers to nothing more than Jesus’ desire to extend his ministry beyond the towns and their synagogues,” (Mark, in NAC, vol. 23 [Nashville: B&H, 1991], 69–70).
3 “Mark seems to have been suggesting that all peoples should seek Jesus and that they may be assured of acceptance. Readers and hearers of his Gospel naturally think about the later Gentile mission,” (Brooks, Mark, 70).
4 A.B. Bruce, The Synoptic Gospels, in Expositor’s Greek Testament (London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton, 1910), 357.
5 For an argument that the “soldiers” John addressed were Jewish, see Darrell L. Bock, Luke 1:1-9:50, in BECNT (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1994), 312-313. One need only read the Baptist’s preaching to realize this is an exclusively Jewish message, and the context of Malachi’s prophecy (3:1) makes this quite clear.
6 Peter’s comment to Cornelius (Acts 10:27-29) reflect this blasphemous view of Gentiles. Even as a fully-illuminated and Spirit-filled Christian, Peter still struggled for a time to get rid of this baggage. So did the Jerusalem church (Acts 11).
7 Mark Strauss suggests, “The boat may have been for escape in case the crowd crushed forward, but more likely is meant for crowd control, a kind of platform or podium to keep from being jostled,” (Mark, in ZECNT [Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014], 154). I find this explanation unlikely. Jesus ordered the boat to be prepared in order that (ἵνα + subjunctive) they would not press Him (μὴ θλίβωσιν αὐτόν). The reason is to avoid the crush of the crowd.
Matthew Henry suggests this was simply a practical measure, so “that, when he had despatched the necessary business he had to do in one place, he might easily remove to another, where his presence was requisite, without pressing through the crowds of people that followed him for curiosity,” (Commentary on the Whole Bible [Peabody: Hendrickson, 1994], 1782).
8 See especially Edwards’ discussion of crowds in Mark’s Gospel (Mark, 74-75). Each person will have to come to his own understanding of the crowds. I believe the Gospel of Mark (indeed, all the Gospels) are clear that crowds followed the Christ for unholy and selfish reasons.
9 Matthew Henry remarked, “What abundance of good he did in his retirement. He did not withdraw to be idle, nor did he send back those who rudely crowded after him when he withdrew, but took it kindly, and gave them what they came for; for he never said to any that sought him diligently, Seek ye me in vain,” (Commentary, 1782).
10 Again, Strauss has a positive interpretation of the crowd. “It is excitement and enthusiasm for Jesus’ healing power that is motivating the crowds,” (Mark, 154). R. Alan Cole also has a positive interpretation of the crowd (Mark, in TNTC, vol. 2 [Downer’s Grove, IL: IVP, 1989], 135-165). Similarly, Gould writes, “[T]he verb is a strong word … and is intended to bring before us vividly the turbulent eagerness and excitement of the crowd,” (St. Mark, 55).
Brooks suggests, “apparently the crowd sought Jesus because of his healings, not to submit themselves to the reign of God,” (Mark, 70). This reflects the wide gulf of opinions about the crowds.
11 Some commentators suggest the demons are attempting to exercise dominion and authority over Jesus by crying out His name. See, for example, William L. Lane, The Gospel According to Mark, in NICNT (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974), 130. Strauss (Mark, 155) and Walter Wessell (Luke, in EBC, vol. 8 [Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1984], 641) also follow this line of interpretation.
12 Strauss suggests the demons were not the kind of beings Jesus wanted testifying who He was. “[T]he demons are inappropriate heralds of his person and mission (cf. 1: 25). Jesus will reveal his identity in his own time and through his own words and deeds,” (Mark, 155).
This doesn’t go far enough. Jesus tells both demons and healed men to not tell anybody about Him (cf. 1:44, 5:43). The real reason must be deeper than this. One good explanation is that the true nature of the Messiah cannot be fully appreciated until after His death, burial, resurrection and ascension. He comes the first time as the suffering servant; the second time as the conquering king.
13 “Christ calls whom he will; for he is a free Agent, and his grace is his own,” (Henry, Commentary, 1782).
14 “The proclamation which they were to make was the coming of the kingdom of God,” (Gould, St. Mark, 57).
15 “This showed that the power which Christ had to work these miracles was an original power; that he had it not as a Servant, but as a Son in his own house, in that he could confer it upon others, and invest them with it,” (Henry, Commentary, 1783).
16 This is one of the implications of the title. “As the Son of God, Jesus shares the Father’s glory, power, and authority,” (Strauss, Mark, 155).
17 1833 New Hampshire Confession of Faith, Article 2.
Tyler Robbins 2016 v2
Tyler Robbins is a bi-vocational pastor at Sleater Kinney Road Baptist Church, in Olympia WA. He also works in State government. He blogs as the Eccentric Fundamentalist.
- 165 views
Tyler R wrote:
Little has changed. Many people do not seek Christ because they want forgiveness and justification. They seek Jesus because of what He can do for Him. He’s a Cosmic Butler, who lives to serve us.
I recently listened to a sermon from a pseudo-megachurch near my home…The message was, “come to Jesus so He can make your life easier, give you a better job, more money and make you happy.”
These crowds in Mark’s Gospel are the same. His message is irrelevant to them; they just want healing.10 The implications of that healing are lost on them (cf. Lk 7:18-23, Mk 3:22-27).
It’s true that for many unsaved, the allure of physical health and prosperity are a false attraction to Christ. But the idea of Christ as a “cosmic butler” has invaded many believers, myself included.
In my experience, it is much more common for believers to make prayer requests for healing and financial relief for themselves and friends and family than they make for genuine repentance, joy in Christ, and steadfastness and obedience.
The urgent prayer requests in the past two churches I have been at have been more skewed toward healing and requests for jobs or for cars and houses than for “those things which are above” in Colossians 3:1. I don’t say that we shouldn’t be praying for these things, but it’s the balance between them and spiritual concerns that is off. And I wonder if the imbalance is due to a misconception or a perversion of a believer’s view of Christ.
I am also convinced that the “cosmic butler” view of God has permeated my evangelistic efforts in the past. Asking a proposed convert “Would you like to go to heaven when you die?” is simply the prosperity gospel - but extended to eternity, not to this present world. I have asked numerous unregenerate to believe primarily based on a promise of eternal luxury. That is not the proper incentive to come to Christ!
I would argue that the “cosmic butler” problem is not just manifest in the lost, but in the church as well, and the church needs to repent from it.
John B. Lee
I agree with that. Think of the common acronym ACTS, which does a good job of encapsulating what kind of prayers we ought to offer to God:
- Adoration
- Confession
- Thanksgiving
- Praise
I should have done a lot more to emphasize more of this at my last church. I think it is a major problem for all of us. Thanks for pointing it out.
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
[JBL] I am also convinced that the “cosmic butler” view of God has permeated my evangelistic efforts in the past. Asking a proposed convert “Would you like to go to heaven when you die?” is simply the prosperity gospel - but extended to eternity, not to this present world. I have asked numerous unregenerate to believe primarily based on a promise of eternal luxury. That is not the proper incentive to come to Christ!
I’ve never really thought of “Would you like to go to heaven when you die?” as an offer of luxury. I’ve always thought of it as “You have two options for after death - eternal punishment in hell or heaven. Would you like to go to heaven?” Would it be better to ask “Would you like to stay out of hell?” or would that also be another improper incentive? After all, it might be interpreted as “live however you want right now as long as you stay out of hell” even though that is not the way we mean it.
Heaven sounds great in that it has streets of gold, rivers of life, no disease, and is a place of eternal peace and rest. But these aspects are not in and of themselves the essence of heaven. The essence of heaven is being in the pure and unadulterated presence and glory of God. Without this, no location is heaven.
On a similar note, we also have to be careful that we do not think of heaven as the reward for salvation. God himself is the “reward” for salvation. It is Him that we gain when we are saved. Apart from Him, anything else is useless.
There are very limited to no cultural apparatuses that convey this truth. The predominant cultural portrayal of heaven is that it is a place of great gain for the physical body and physical mind. As a result, I believe that asking someone if they want to go to heaven is a very loaded question.
I no longer believe that it is wise to frame the question of salvation as securing an eternal destination (heaven or hell, one way or another). Salvation really is a matter of eternal character, not eternal destination. We repent because we realize we are not God and not like Him, and believe that God has the power and best intention to change our character because he first sent his Son to die for us.
My evangelism has changed over the years from focusing on the destination to focusing more on the character and work of God. We need to trust wholly the fact that Jesus Christ will draw men to Himself, and that the Holy Spirit will convict men of sin. Those two forces working in an unsaved person’s life will simultaneously give him the idea of the depravity of his character and the holiness and desirability of God’s. I believe this dichotomy allows the choice of repentance to be made or rejected.
John B. Lee
[JBL] I no longer believe that it is wise to frame the question of salvation as securing an eternal destination (heaven or hell, one way or another). Salvation really is a matter of eternal character, not eternal destination. We repent because we realize we are not God and not like Him, and believe that God has the power and best intention to change our character because he first sent his Son to die for us.
Ah, I see your point. My initial statement earlier should not have been “You have two options for after death - eternal punishment in hell or heaven.” It should have been “You have two options - life or death. ” Life or death would then be described in the character terms that the Bible uses as Spirit or flesh. Would that be appropriate? Of course, after we have the Spirit, we still have the flesh, so maybe those two terms are still confusing when speaking of turning to God in the initial salvation experience.
Discussion