How a Worship Format is Destroying the Evangelical Church

During my lifetime, many evangelical churches in American have moved from Bible-oriented gatherings to music-dominated meetings. Interestingly, both sets of religious gatherings typically bore the title, “Worship Service.”

When the evangelical church was Bible-oriented, this “worship” paradigm was in place:

(1) Not all elements of the service were considered equally important; the exposition of Scripture was clearly the first and foremost priority. All other competitors vied for a distant second place.

(2) When the term “worship” was used, it was the equivalent of our modern casual expression, “doing church.” It is important to note that the preaching of the Word was considered part of worship, as were announcements, testimonies, communion, prayer, singing, the offering, and special music. This was the typical structure of a “worship service” before 1980.

(3) Many evangelicals viewed music as a “warm up for the sermon.” In this regard, many leaders did not seem to often respect music ministry as actual ministry but many others did.

The change

But the paradigm has changed in many churches. The most important change was what the word “worship” communicates. The word “worship” is now used by clergy and laity alike to refer to the religious feelings aroused by music.

(1) The change in paradigms began with the addition on an article: “the” worship. As trivial as this seems, this was the beginning of emphasizing music and separating preaching and announcements from worship. We now have “the worship” and “the sermon.”

Here is just one possible scenario resulting from this change in definition. John Member has schedule a meeting with Pastor Jones. Let’s eavesdrop.

“Pastor, I think we need to cut down the time you preach. Fifteen minutes is plenty, I think.”

“I don’t agree,” replies Pastor Jones, “studying the Bible is crucial for every Christian.”

“Oh, I agree that the Bible is important, Pastor,” responds John Member, “but our morning service is billed as the morning worship service, so it should be mainly about worship, not preaching.”

In the above hypothetical conversation, you can see how the two meanings of the word “worship” are colliding with one another. In the pastor’s mind, Bible study is an important part of worship, but not in the mind of John Member. He views only music as “worship.”

(2) Other terminology changed. Schools that offered a major in church music (or “sacred music” for the hoi polloi) changed the major to “Worship Arts” (about the same time shades and curtains became “window treatments”). The song leader became known as the “worship leader.”

(3) Music became more emotionally intense, and a confusion between the emotional and the spiritual helped set music on an untouchable pedestal. Worship had become something one felt, not something one did. Worship was judged as good or bad based upon how it made worshippers feel. The Scriptures no longer defined good worship; the individual had become the discerner of truth based upon how he felt.

(4) In mega-churches, elitism and an attitude oriented toward musicians performing to the standards of other musicians (rather than aiming to bless the congregation) seems to be the norm. In some cases, musicians have become a special religious caste (like a priest, they lead the sacrifice of praise into the holy place).

(5) Even though Colossians 3:16 implies we should aim our hymns and songs both vertically and horizontally (we sing to one another and in our hearts to the Lord), the entire concept of worshiping God in the third person is gone, despite the fact that many Psalms speak of God as “He” rather than “You.”

(6) The goal of worship is creating a religious atmosphere and its attendant feelings. Often times worship leaders are weak in biblical and theological matters, but because more Christians value “worship” above theology, some of these leaders are carving out a pattern for church with little regard for biblical teaching about what the church is supposed to do when gathered.

(7) Here is the pattern: eventually worship (music and that religious feeling) is considered almost on a par with Scripture, then equal to Scripture, and eventually superior to it.* The Scriptures become subservient to the music and are used more as transitions between songs than holy word to be expounded. Biblical sermons have given way to self-help lectures or emotionally charged sermons with lots of illustrations—replacing the previous Psalm 1 mentality. The idea of worshiping God through deep Bible study and meditation in the Word is unknown; worship now means music and feelings.

The consequences & dangers of the new “worship format”

  1. Religion is back in vogue. We used to hear “I’m not religious, I just love the Lord,” or “Christianity is not a religion; it is a relationship.” Because of the new emphasis on religious feeling, it is fair to say that we have moved back into the domain of religion.
  2. Worship has become a religious experience dependent upon something else than the gathering of Christians to study the Word, pray, celebrate communion, and sing a few hymns. Based upon modern viewpoints, the early church must have done a poor job of worshipping God.
  3. If the church is about worship, and if worship is a religious feeling induced from a church gathering, then, if I get a stronger version of that feeling somewhere else, that is where I need to be. Rather than the Bible, a passionate feeling of worship becomes the canon by which I measure truth.

As a result, Christians not only move from evangelical church to evangelical church, but they also desert evangelicalism. Our heritage is based upon the centrality of Scripture; we are really novices at the religion game. But even if we competed well on a religious level, are we right to trash the primacy of Scripture? What about the convictions of the Reformation?

The problem is not contemporary music, seeking to have meaningful worship through songs of praise, etc. The problem is displacement. When we displace the knowledge of the Word and solid doctrine with music (whether we call music worship or not), we are no longer under the lordship of Christ. The Christian life includes public worship, but the highest form of worship is hearing and doing the Word of God. That is why the ultimate “worship book” in the Bible, the book of Psalms, begins with emphasizing constant meditation on the Word. The longest Psalm (119) makes the point even more emphatically. God seeks those who worship Him in Spirit and in truth. It is hard to worship God in truth if you don’t know the truth and if you do not make the truth a priority.

Ed Vasicek Bio

Ed Vasicek was raised as a Roman Catholic but, during high school, Cicero (IL) Bible Church reached out to him, and he received Jesus Christ as his Savior by faith alone. Ed earned his BA at Moody Bible Institute and served as pastor for many years at Highland Park Church, where he is now pastor emeritus. Ed and his wife, Marylu, have two adult children. Ed has published over 1,000 columns for the opinion page of the Kokomo Tribune, published articles in Pulpit Helps magazine, and posted many papers which are available at edvasicek.com. Ed has also published the The Midrash Key and The Amazing Doctrines of Paul As Midrash: The Jewish Roots and Old Testament Sources for Paul's Teachings.

Discussion

We had a saying in our church in Idaho: “A church service is not where worship happens but where worshipers gather.”

Our focus was on developing worshipers rather than doing worship. We found that when worshipers of God get together, it does not matter when you have the announcements, how you take the offering, church heater not working, air not working, or someone having a seizure during the opening prayer, you cannot stop genuine meaningful worship from taking place.

[CLeavell] We had a saying in our church in Idaho: “A church service is not where worship happens but where worshipers gather.”

Our focus was on developing worshipers rather than doing worship. We found that when worshipers of God get together, it does not matter when you have the announcements, how you take the offering, church heater not working, air not working, or someone having a seizure during the opening prayer, you cannot stop genuine meaningful worship from taking place.
Wow. I like that.

Let me clarify myself: I am not saying that the Word and music are mutually exclusive. It does not have to be one or the other (as Aaron pointed out). But I am saying that the Word does matter more, and that the trend is away from the Word and toward more music. There are many churches that are both/and, but I would argue they are in the minority in the evangelical world, particularly in the mega-churches.

There is plenty of Scriptural warrant for the legitimacy of music ministry.

"The Midrash Detective"



I wrote this about 13 years ago. It is used by our brethren from the former Soviet Union.

1. Traditionally, Evangelical Christian Baptists follow what we in the States would think of as a Plymouth Brethren style of service.

2. A typical Sunday (morning or evening) service goes something like this:

a. the Pastor or his designee calls the service to order and gives the Invocation.

b. a choir number

c. congregational hymn

d. the first preacher (the Pastor or the man in charge of the service has previously designated which of the preachers in the church will be speaking at a given service and in what order ) speaks usually for 10-15 minutes.

This message is usually a Call to Worship or Prayer

e. congregational prayer (three maybe four men or women lead in prayer from their places in the meeting hall, with the preacher closing). This is a time of Thanksgiving for the God’s provision in the last week. The preacher closes with a prayer for God s blessing on the coming service.

f. a congregational hymn

g. a senior choir number or

h. a children’s choir or

i. a recitation of Christian poetry by an individual or group

j. the second preacher speaks (see d. above). This preacher brings a strong Bible Message for 20-25 minutes.

k. repeat f-i.

l. the third preacher speaks (usually at Nezavisimaya this is Pastor Minnikov). This man may tie the two previous speakers together. (Or he may launch off on his own message.)

m. see e. above

n. congregational hymn and offering

o. greetings from various churches

p. prayer requests are taken and final prayer two+ hours later.

Hoping to shed more light than heat..

[Rob Fall] I wrote this about 13 years ago. It is used by our brethren from the former Soviet Union.

1. Traditionally, Evangelical Christian Baptists follow what we in the States would think of as a Plymouth Brethren style of service.

2. A typical Sunday (morning or evening) service goes something like this:

a. the Pastor or his designee calls the service to order and gives the Invocation.

b. a choir number

c. congregational hymn

d. the first preacher (the Pastor or the man in charge of the service has previously designated which of the preachers in the church will be speaking at a given service and in what order ) speaks usually for 10-15 minutes.

This message is usually a Call to Worship or Prayer

e. congregational prayer (three maybe four men or women lead in prayer from their places in the meeting hall, with the preacher closing). This is a time of Thanksgiving for the God’s provision in the last week. The preacher closes with a prayer for God s blessing on the coming service.

f. a congregational hymn

g. a senior choir number or

h. a children’s choir or

i. a recitation of Christian poetry by an individual or group

j. the second preacher speaks (see d. above). This preacher brings a strong Bible Message for 20-25 minutes.

k. repeat f-i.

l. the third preacher speaks (usually at Nezavisimaya this is Pastor Minnikov). This man may tie the two previous speakers together. (Or he may launch off on his own message.)

m. see e. above

n. congregational hymn and offering

o. greetings from various churches

p. prayer requests are taken and final prayer two+ hours later.
It would be hard to say that these folks did not emphasize the Word! But part of what I have been getting at in these posts is that we are often most dogmatic about what we can prove least from the Scripture. We are nowhere told to imitate the early church’s way of doing things (descriptions), IMO. But we are given prescriptions to fill. We must seek to be discerning because how we do church is going to vary with the culture. For example, the former Soviet Union approach would probably not be as effective in our culture. We can hold our views about quantity, quality and type of music and formal vs. informal, but we need to recognize that these are matters of preference, judgment, and perhaps effectiveness. They may be the result of us seeking to be led by the Spirit, but they are not “thus saith the Lord.” Yet we fight over some of these things as though they were.

What is a “thus saith the Lord” is that our leaders “preach the Word” and that we recognize the centrality of the Word. God rules through His Word, and when we make it subservient to anything — including what some of us might call “worship,” we have de-throned God. God has exalted two things: His Name AND His Word. Yet we learn about His Name from His Word.

"The Midrash Detective"

Ed, I must admit that when I first read your article, I winced at what I thought was a typical rant against contemporary styles. Obviously I did not read carefully enough, and I did not even try to unload my own baggage before approaching your article. After reading the ensuing comments—especially yours—I cannot express how much I appreciate what you’ve had to say. I went back to reread your article without my hefty chattel, and suddenly I was amazed at how much it had improved! Thanks for the article, and especially thanks for your follow-up comments.

We visited a church this morning that was an invigorating breath of fresh spiritual air. There was no choir or “specials”, even though the church could have easily entertained ;) us if they had chosen. There were six Christ-honoring hymns sung with joy by the congregation interspersed with Scripture reading and prayer. The 50-55 minute expositional sermon was rich in content and application and devoid of extraneous material. I think we’re going back.

"Some things are of that nature as to make one's fancy chuckle, while his heart doth ache." John Bunyan

I am a latecomer to this discussion, but still want to commend a fine article. Ed, you focused rather well on a significant problem and gave an excellent answer.

Jeff Brown

@ Susan R,

Are the lists of spiritual gifts exhaustive or representative?

The list of spiritual gifts is not exhaustive, but in combination with Scripture that gives prerequisites for specific ministry positions in the church, I don’t believe in music ‘ministers’ as being an ordained church office on par with pastors and deacons.

[Susan R] The list of spiritual gifts is not exhaustive, but in combination with Scripture that gives prerequisites for specific ministry positions in the church, I don’t believe in music ‘ministers’ as being an ordained church office on par with pastors and deacons.
I agree, Susan. There might be some correlation between the music ministry (esp. composition) and prophecy (a term with several definitions and categories) in that Miriam was also a prophetess, and the Sons of Korah, the Sons of Asaph, etc. were considered prophets, as was David. Please do not confuse my comment by restricting it to the revelatory nature of the OT prophets; some modern Christian songwriters, like the Gettys, might have a touch of the prophetic gift (non-revelatory) or we might say instead that they have “an anointing.”

Musical talent is a gift from God (as are the arts in general), but not necessarily a spiritual grace gift. But the ability to minister through music might be connected to a spiritual gift, possibly of exhortation, mercy, teaching or even faith. And whether gifted this way or not, when we minister to honor God, we are worshiping Him. So there is plenty of overlap between the listed gifts and how they could be used in a musical context, in addition to the idea that not all spiritual gifts are listed.

Jeff, Ron, and Dan — thank you for the encouragement!

"The Midrash Detective"

Ed, I am a younger guy on here (29) but I do find much of what you say instructive and right on. I do find that we dont think enough about how to best construct our services or that how we do construct them communicates something whether we intend to or not.

I am not in favor of the term “worship leader” for the person who leads singing as it communicates the wrong thing even if unintended. I do think that we should make much of the music as I think Scripture does as well. We should pay attention to the songs we sing and seek to perform them well (by perform I am not referring to entertaining but how we do them).

I wholeheartedly agree with the concept of the service being Word centered, that is on Scripture. I do have one thought though. If all the elements of the service are rooted in Scripture - the Word - then can they at some level be considered Word centered as well? Thus, the whole service is Word centered because all of the elements are derived from or focus on the Word (songs, prayers, Lord’s Supper, scripture reading, etc.). I could grant that the preaching of the Word might be considered the climax of the whole worship service but if the other elements are Word founded and focused then this would make the whole service Word centered.

[KevinM]
[Aaron Blumer] I think the fact that the people of God gathered to worship together under Moses (and music was part of that) means that the people of God are still to gather to worship… and through music. And this seems to me to be confirmed in Acts 2, 4 and Eph. 5 and Col 3.
Aaron, I hear what you are saying. I’m worried that your appeal to Moses interjects an interpretive rule that we aren’t willing to consistently apply to the NT church. Would we apply every ritual of Israel to our NT local churches? [Of course you aren’t saying that. I’m just looking at the interpretive principle.] And while I agree that Acts 2, 4, Eph. 5 and Col 3 have much to say about our church meetings…none of them speak of “corporate worship.” That’s a baggage-laden phrase that isn’t helping us get to the basic question of what the church does when it gathers. [Oh, there might be a reason for my technical rant, but in the meantime, I’ll disclose that I’ll be leading worship at my own church tomorrow morning!]
Solid point. I was reflecting on this last night as our Q & A time at church intersected with questions of what to do with Deut.22 today (though I ran out of time before responding to that question). I usually prefer to take the whole of the Mosaic covenant system and declare it “profitable” (per 2Tim3.16) but not “as law” binding on us today.

Making my case will have to wait for another day, but I feel deeply and strongly that gathered worship has always been an expectation God has had for His people and so central to why we exist that I can’t really entertain the idea of it taking a back seat to anything else.

But I have to admit this is, for me, pretty much an unexamined conviction.

I have to say, though, that “corporate worship” is just another way of saying “singing with melody in your hearts to the Lord,” along with the other activities that have been central to gathered worship over the millennia.

(I think I’m closer to the Presbyterians in attitude about gathered worship, though seeing “Sacrament of baptism” in the liturgy makes me—as my kids say—freak. My wife and I spent the better of a year in a “Reformed Baptist” church in Austin, TX back in the late 90’s. We loved the way they worshiped… though communion seemed a little spooky to us at first.)

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

This might sound dispensationally incorrect, but this verse has to mean something…

1 Pe 2:9 NKJV 9 But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light;



If the church is a royal priesthood in any sense, it must include the sense of gathered worshipers. I’m agreed with most dispensationalists that it does not mean the church has completely taken over Israel’s role. But what are priests if not worshipers and what is a priesthood if not a group of priests who worship together?

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

[Aaron Blumer] This might sound dispensationally incorrect, but this verse has to mean something…[1 Pe 2:9 NKJV] If the church is a royal priesthood in any sense, it must include the sense of gathered worshipers. I’m agreed with most dispensationalists that it does not mean the church has completely taken over Israel’s role. But what are priests if not worshipers and what is a priesthood if not a group of priests who worship together?
Sure—all of this is great. I especially love the phrase “gathered worshipers,” which seems to be a unifying idea and a better alternative.

For those who continue to prefer the “corporate worship” term, I would be happy to do special music in your church (!), I’m just not convinced the term has a lot of teaching value. I’d like to avoid a “corporate worship” that insists on a prescribed list of Presbyterian worship “elements,” a school of thought that does not fully consider the dramatic transformation from old covenant to church age. And I’m trying to avoid a cut-and-paste approach to systematic theology, where we grab attractive ideas even if they don’t fit well into our own theological framework. [Aaron, I’m not saying you are doing a cut-and-paste, I’m just mentioning our current eclectic tendencies when it comes to worship theory. And I realize that many of our Presbyterian brothers and sisters read SI…I’m just saying our Baptist theology may expess these issues differently.] My goal is pretty close to Ed’s intention, presenting the activities of the gathered church in a way that gives proper consideration to [at least] “worship” and “mutual edification.”

Oh, and not to blow up the thread, but earlier we discussed the lack of NT warrant for the phrase “corporate worship,” seeking specific passages where the word “worship” is used to describe an activity of the gathered church. It is tempting to cite the use of proskyneo in 1 Cor. 14:25…an apparent reference to an unsaved person (seeker??) who visits the church service, gets saved (evangelism?) and then begins worshiping. Oh, the irony!

[CPHurst] Ed, I am a younger guy on here (29) but I do find much of what you say instructive and right on. I do find that we dont think enough about how to best construct our services or that how we do construct them communicates something whether we intend to or not.

I am not in favor of the term “worship leader” for the person who leads singing as it communicates the wrong thing even if unintended. I do think that we should make much of the music as I think Scripture does as well. We should pay attention to the songs we sing and seek to perform them well (by perform I am not referring to entertaining but how we do them).

I wholeheartedly agree with the concept of the service being Word centered, that is on Scripture. I do have one thought though. If all the elements of the service are rooted in Scripture - the Word - then can they at some level be considered Word centered as well? Thus, the whole service is Word centered because all of the elements are derived from or focus on the Word (songs, prayers, Lord’s Supper, scripture reading, etc.). I could grant that the preaching of the Word might be considered the climax of the whole worship service but if the other elements are Word founded and focused then this would make the whole service Word centered.
It is hard to argue with such a reasonable post. I might add this caveat, however (not that you are saying otherwise): we must distinguish between USING the Word and digging into the Word.

Let me digress a bit and take the conversation in a slightly different direction. I should come to church to honor God (worship), but, as a disciple, I am also on a constant quest to learn the Word and understand it more deeply (the best synonym for disciple is learner), so I should come to be challenged and developed in both the grace and knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. What is happening in many churches is that they are downplaying the importance of learning Scripture. We want to be doers of the Word without being hearers, a problem James did not address but the writer to the Hebrews did in Hebrews 5:12
For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you have need again for someone to teach you the elementary principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food.
We should sense a burden to deliver the Word at both a milk and solid food level. I believe in your case I am preaching to the choir!

"The Midrash Detective"