The Internal Evidence of Inerrancy, Part 2
By Bob Courtney. Read Part 1.
The Internal Evidence of Inerrancy, Part 1
By Bob Courtney
Discussion
The House Divided: An Assessment of the American Neo-Evangelicals’ Doctrine of Scripture
Body
“Lindsell represents the evangelicals that saw inerrancy as a test for evangelical authenticity…. Henry saw inerrancy as a test for evangelical consistency rather than authenticity. Ramm … affirmed a broad concept of inerrancy but did not see it as either the test of authenticity or consistency.
Discussion
Inerrancy: An Ever-Relevant Doctrine, Part 1
By Kenn Chipchase
Discussion
We Stand or Fall on These Truths
The battle cry of the Protestant Reformation is often summarized in five sola statements: sola Scriptura, sola gratia, sola fide, solus Christus, and soli Deo gloria.1 Although you often can find these five sola statements written in a different order, the order is significant, and the first and last are always given pride of place. This is not by accident. Sola Scriptura, Scripture alone, was the basis of all the other doctrines that follow.
Discussion
New Research Confirms Postflood Dispersal of Humanity
Body
“the dispersal of humanity described in Genesis 10–11 need not be considered a fantastic element. The data provide no warrant, scientific or otherwise, to abandon or alter the traditional historical doctrine of biblical inerrancy.” - Hugh Ross
Discussion
5 Recommended Resources on Inspiration and Inerrancy
Body
“The following resources, curated by the Ligonier editorial team, seek to answer these eternally significant questions and build confidence that the Bible is the final and authoritative Word of God.” - Ligonier
Discussion
Inerrancy: Recent Overview and a Review
Body
Among other things, a look at the importance of Westminster Theological Seminary and Vern Poythress’ Inerrancy and the Gospels in the defense of the doctrine of inerrancy. - Ref21
Discussion
Updating the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy: A Proposal
Body
“…should we concur with Geisler that the CSBI is in no need of revision? Has there been no positive advance in the doctrine of Scripture since 1978 that may help strengthen the CSBI for future theological and ecclesial use?” - TGC
Discussion
Image
Discussion