3 Lines of Evidence for Jesus’s Resurrection
Body
“Jesus Christ’s resurrection is at the very heart of historic Christianity. It is both a central doctrine and the central supporting evidence for the truth of the faith.” - Reasons
In Defense of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
Body
Why Anselm’s 11th century argument defending the reality of God as “that than which greater cannot be thought” still holds up - Gavin Ortlund
Discussion
Biblical Worldview Conference looks at evidence for Jesus' resurrection, 'fine-tuning' of the universe
Body
Lee Strobel, William Lane Craig among speakers at Prestonwood apologetics conference - CPost
Discussion
“Can God be proven? Yes.”
Body
“Faith and reason have been divorced, and we Christians sometimes swallow that pill without realizing it. But it doesn’t have to be that way.” - Credo
Discussion
Apologetics & Your Kids: Part 6 - Do Facts Speak for Themselves?
Read the series so far.
Facing the Evidence
I want to move forward a bit now to the subject of evidence. Probably many of you have heard the old dictum that scientists “follow the evidence wherever it leads.” Often scientists themselves promote this idea, and others catch on and parrot it. It sounds very dignified—almost pious. And, as philosophers of science like Thomas Kuhn and Michael Polanyi have shown, it is almost totally false.
Several years ago, a well known, oft-published physicist named Robert V. Gentry published a book entitled Creation’s Tiny Mystery, which cataloged his research on Polonium 218 radiohalos. The book makes fascinating reading, and it has never been gainsaid. All the same, Gentry’s researched has been shunted to the side by evolutionists because, well, it provides compelling data for the assertion that the earth is young.
Discussion
Image
Discussion