In studying for future articles on convictions, I came across this paper (very good). The point of this paper is to explore the tension between the individual's liberty of conscience and the authority of the church and its leaders.
THE CONFLICT BETWEEN LIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE AND CHURCH AUTHORITY IN TODAY’S EVANGELICAL CHURCH (link is to pdf at RTS) Quote from pdf-p.86:
The Puritans spoke of liberty of conscience because they wanted to obey God’s Word, not have men diminish or change its teaching. The liberty they fought for was not liberty to disobey, but freedom to obey. It was freedom to teach the truth and oppose falsehood. For example, when King James I, as the head of the Church of England, demanded that churches read to their congregations “The Book of Sports,” which declared people free to participate in lawful recreations on the Lord’s Day, the Westminster divine Simeon Ashe refused to read it to his congregation.41
41 James Reid, Memoirs of the Westminster Divines (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1982), 115. It should be noted that many other Puritans also refused to read “The Book of Sports” to their congregations. For more information on the Book of Sports controversy of 1617-18 and other issues regarding the Sabbath, see Kenneth Parker, The English Sabbath: A Study of Doctrine and Discipline from the Reformation to the Civil War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Another line of objection would be that a King has no place telling a local pastor what to teach. But that wasn't described here as the reason for objection.
Instead, Ashe's refusal to read the King's edict was done to "teach the truth and oppose falsehood."
Here's a link to "The Book of Sports." Reminds me of the Chariots of Fire movie.
What do you think?