01.07.2011- A Date Worth Saving?
"Our task today is to tell people — who no longer know what sin is...no longer see themselves as sinners, and no longer have room for these categories — that Christ died for sins of which they do not think they’re guilty." - David Wells
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
That combo would be a fundamentalism worth saving! :)
[B Thomas]…. Or maybe you were being facetious about the merge idea?The smiley is key :)
[B Thomas] It seems that the Standpoint fellas have the goal of re-defining or at least re-working, not saving an existing or former fundamentalism. Merging doesn’t work when the goals are different. Or maybe you were being facetious about the merge idea?No, no, no. We’re defining us, not re-defining anyone else! We’re going to tell where we stand — particularly on koinonia. If that makes us Fundamentalist in some particular person’s eye, or not, is up to them.
But the conference does sound like a no-miss event. I’m glad I live nearby.
Mike Durning
My question has always been, “When did God promise to preserve a movement?”
He did promise to preserve His word.
However, given what Bauder has written on many occasions in the past, I’m confident this is not about preserving the movement, which he already believes is dead and gone. It’s about preserving a set of principles and practices and probably, to some extent, relationships. I think the other lead speakers may not be quite as firm on the “movement is dead” angle as Bauder is, however. Haven’t seen or heard their thoughts on that question.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
My Blog: http://dearreaderblog.com
Cor meum tibi offero Domine prompte et sincere. ~ John Calvin
Discussion