James Comey: The fall of a Niebuhrian
“As Comey came under the microscope of national attention, we learned that he had written his undergraduate thesis on [Reinhold] Niebuhr.” RNS
Somehow I’m not persuaded that Comey’s behavior is attributable to Niebuhr….I am at a loss to see how Niebuhr would have justified allowing people being investigated to destroy evidence, failing to obtain relevant known evidence, failure to convene a grand jury and issue subpoenas, and flagrant breach of FBI protocol. Yes, “realism” can give some things we consider morally dubious, but the whole point of realism and its associated Realpolitik is that you make the moral compromises when you know what they are. A classic example is the moral horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki vs. the moral horror of a hypothetical invasion of Japan.
That’s not what Comey did—his work in that case was more along the lines of “sweep it under the rug”, and I would suspect any investigation he did of the IRS was more of the same. He needed to go years ago.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
I think you don’t have the whole story on Comey… and you’re asserting a lot of conjecture there as if it were fact.
It has to mean something that, mistakes notwithstanding, the man was (is) widely respected by law enforcement leaders both inside and outside of the Bureau, including people at very different points of the political spectrum.
It will be hard for Trump/DOJ to replace him with someone equally skilled.
Did he botch the Hillary thing? Quite possibly. But two things on that: all the facts are not known, and it’s so, so easy to pass judgment on choices leaders make from the safety of the living room sofa with nothing at all at stake. The fact is that we don’t know anyone else in that predicament would have done any better. Maybe… maybe not.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
Understood that I don’t have “all the facts”, but what I noted is true. Comey did not get the server quickly, and it was erased while he dilly-dallied. He did not convene a grand jury, issued no subpoenas, and allowed witnesses to destroy evidence. In his statements about the Hilliary case, he also misstated the law’s requirements pretty badly. Numerous prosecutors have noted this with alarm.
Sorry, but these don’t even rise to the level of “rookie mistakes”, and they are a sign that somebody is leaning on someone to make them. If indeed Loretta Lynch was getting in his way there—or in the IRS investigation as well—he needed to make a stink about it, not go on as if everything were alright and do a 10% investigation that his boss’ boss used to declare his administration scandal-free.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
Comey is a figurehead. He is irrelevant to actual investigations. He doesn’t do investigations. The investigators do the investigations. People need to realize that. He is irrelevant. IRRELEVANT. This is something people who aren’t in criminal or regulatory investigations often don’t understand. Comey wasn’t a technician or an SME; he was a program manager (admittedly, he ran a big program!). Different roles. As a program manager, he has strategic input and sets broad goals. But, he doesn’t actually do investigations himself. This is why the hysteria over the potential impact on the Russian investigations makes me laugh. One of the benefits to being clueless is that you never quite realize how clueless you are …
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
Tyler, Comey is a former prosecutor. Although he wasn’t doing that particular investigation, he knows very well what a properly run investigation looks like, and also knows very well what laws require intent, and which do not. He was also, as the manager of the FBI, responsible for getting his subordinates the tools and information they needed to do their jobs.
Sorry, he doesn’t get off just because he wasn’t doing the investigation, especially since he was the one that mandated investigator silence and authorized destruction of evidence.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
My comments weren’t directed to you, but to the general hysteria about Comey’s firing. My own assessment is that he needed to go. He seemed like a bumbler. But, it should have been handled better. As Krauthammer mentioned, Trump handled this the way a mafia boss would. Ugly.
As far as being a program manager goes, he isn’t personally guilty of any investigative missteps, but he is responsible. That has to mean something. The FBI needs somebody better. I’d prefer an investigator run the FBI.
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
Well said. One thing that strikes me, though, is that learning the basics of investigations—what should, and what should not be there, etc.,—is child’s play compared to the need to determine whether or not the person has management skills and a backbone. Somehow it seems that DC actively selects against vertebrae.
Going way back to the original point, I’m still at a loss as to how one would blame Niebuhr for Comey’s plight. Again, difficult realities being heeded don’t explain what he did.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
That skill is at a premium right now. Technical competence is good, management skills and a backbone is something else entirely. This is a pervasive problem, and it will always be a pervasive problem. Some people are technical experts, but aren’t capable of leading children to a candy shop. Others are competent, but are also excellent managers who pack battleaxes to work and are willing to cut heads off, if they need to - in the interests of doing the right thing. For a leader of an organization, the latter is best.
Anybody who has worked in any organization, particularly a larger bureaucracy (corporate or government) knows what I’m talking about.
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
This just keeps getting worse. It pains me to see an active-duty O-8 like General McMaster have to make excuses for a President who is proving himself to be unequal to the task of being President. For example, look at the recent kerfluffle about whether Trump shared classified information with Russian officials. Every day brings new confirmation of President Trump’s ineptitude. Now this, from NBC:
I believe this could have happened. I also believe Trump is careless enough to have inadvertently shared higghly classified information with the Russians. I have been willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, because I understand the media is hysterically trying to find something, anything, to hang Trump with. In general, I think the alleged “Russian connection” is widely overblown and laughable.
But, the general ineptitude here is staggering. Comey’s firing is a prime example. I have no idea if his White House staff is inept, or if the President is inept, or if both are inept. I have great respect and the fullest confidence in Mattis and McMaster to keep the national security ship on an even keel. I also have confidence in Tillerson and Pence. I’ve never had much confidence in Trump, and I’m rapidly losing what little I did have. This latest story from NBC is bad news, and you know what? I believe he did pressure Comey to drop the inquiry into Flynn. Not good.
This entire administration is a slow-moving trainwreck.
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
….how would Trump have prospered in Gotham real estate for all those years?
I just don’t get this. Anybody at the director level or above has got to be aware that people under pressure will create a paper trail in self-defense, especially lawyers like Comey. I’ve done it myself. I can’t see how someone could have prospered in New York City—filled with some of the sharpest lawyers on the planet and the Mob as well—without figuring this out.
I’m left remembering Casey Stengel: “Can’t anybody here play this game?”. I would call this a rookie mistake, but that would be insulting to rookies.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
I was hoping you’d argue with me, Joe! The way I see this is that either Trump is guilty, and he could be impeached if he’s got recordings, or Comey is lying, and he could be prosecuted for perjury if Trump’s got recordings proving otherwise. Either way, the 1962 Mets are looking downright competent in comparison. I just don’t get how either one of them got to the point they were at with this kind of thinking.
Maybe I’m thinking about this too much. Maybe it’s simply that in politics, it’s about politics, and you can get away with a certain amount, but no more, and people are sort of kept honest by wondering when their opponents will reach “too much.”
Update: Gregg Jarrett of Fox News comments that if, as appears to be the case, Comey saw evidence of obstruction of justice but did not report it to the DOJ, he’s likely to lose his law license and go to jail himself. So the plot thickens….
And of course, I’d be happy if a LOT of Washington types went to jail, but that’s just me. :^)
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
Michael Medved has a very wise observation:
Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.
Would not like to see Pence go down in the fallout… not because he’s apparently a Christian, but because he seems to be competent and of good character, and was on the ticket. This would be a better transition.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
I believe that Jeff Sessions said that he’d recuse himself from any involvement in this during his confirmation hearings, so I’m not even sure that this has anything to do with Ryan or the Comey memo. I think this is simply Jeff Sessions and Rosenstein getting together and saying that “we can’t be part of this unless we want the feeding frenzy on our boss to continue.” I also wouldn’t be surprised if Trump himself send a note to Sessions telling him to go ahead because there isn’t much to find. Rosenstein would also be able to comment on whether much had been found yet and confirm or deny that this was a good idea.
So I’m skeptical, not last because there was a candidate who had already given up the farm to Russia, who was in favor of reducing domestic oil production and against expansion of the military, and who had a private server that presumably gave Russia a treasure trove of blackmail opportunities—that candidate was of course Hillary Clinton. It’s also come out that one big source for the WikiLeaks memos that helped sink her was a Democratic activist. So exactly what Russia had to gain from Trump is beyond me.
I anticipate that Mueller will find at least one “Scooter Libby” foolish enough to talk without his lawyer present, and otherwise it’s going to be just like John Danforth’s “investigation” of Waco, that “mysteriously” failed to find any wrongdoing at the FBI despite that agency “losing” the front door, videotapes, FLIR cameras, and a lot more evidence.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
House oversight chair seeks Comey memos on Trump
No subpoena yet, but that might be next. I’m agreement with the guys over at National Review (and others) who have said Congress ought to subpoena both the alleged memos and the tapes Trump has implied exist.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
Discussion