It's building really off Genesis 1:27, "male and female He created them". One could object that "it's just one verse", but I seem to remember a number of other places in Scripture where that principle is quoted or repeated. A possible counter-argument would come from Matthew 19:12, which indicates that the Hebrews were indeed aware of the possibility of being born without the capacity for marriage. Whether that would mean things like undescended testicles or more would require a bit more looking.
There are 3 Comments
Part 2 here - marriage & contraception
Interesting
http://blog.adw.org/2019/01/basics-christian-anthropology-speak-moral-is...
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement
interesting
It's building really off Genesis 1:27, "male and female He created them". One could object that "it's just one verse", but I seem to remember a number of other places in Scripture where that principle is quoted or repeated. A possible counter-argument would come from Matthew 19:12, which indicates that the Hebrews were indeed aware of the possibility of being born without the capacity for marriage. Whether that would mean things like undescended testicles or more would require a bit more looking.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
I thought this was good from part 2
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement