Is Competition "Christian"?
Forum category
Is Competition “Christian”?
Before you give up on this topic half-way through reading, check out this link where Christian scholars develop an initial probing:
http://davefagg.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Perspectives-on-Compe…
I started thinking about this in depth by myself just this week, but in research I found that article useful.
I’ve been thinking recently about the moral nature of superfluous competition, as in games and sports. I know that competition extends to other spheres such as economics, sociology, etc., but a view of those gets messier as they are more necessary to survival. Let me distill my inquiry into a simple question:
Is harnessing prideful ambition via competition justifiable under any unnecessary circumstance?
So I’m not arguing against the extreme behavior in sports that many decry today, like college athletics scandals, fighting spectator parents, and steroid use. I’m questioning the very nature of induced competition. Let me give a small and simple example to show what I mean: a thumb war. By locking fingers, are we not agreeing to fight for supremacy over each other? Do we not win by making the other person fail? Do we not rejoice as we succeed as the other person fails? Is this Christian behavior? It might be done to further a bond, but is this a good goal accomplished by infusing prideful ambition into the mix?
Now take a regular sport, like soccer. Yes, many would make the case that of lots of positive ends are being achieved by playing: physical benefits, social benefits, character benefits, etc., but do positive ends justify a prideful ambition means? In fact, a player’s chief aims might be to simply stay in shape and grow in relationships, or to even ultimately glorify the Lord, but am I not saying,
“I will run to these ends by putting the carrot stick of prideful accomplishment before myself.” ?
Now, let me add a disclaimer here. I am not fully sold on this, but I find it worth thinking through. I have studied P.E. in college (among other things), worked as an Activities Director at two different Christian camps, played plenty of sports, received numerous sports awards, coached, and have been beaten in bowling by my grandma without crying, so this isn’t a personal axe to grind against competition. I want to be an antagonist of sorts that represents a compelling view of this argument, not so much because I want to convince you of this position, but because in representing this position well, you can help me to find if there are holes in this thinking. I’ve thought of different arguments myself, but I want to be the antagonist for now.
And before you laugh the question away or offer mostly knee-jerk reactions like in a forum I found with a similar question here (I have no relation that I know of to the questioner)-
http://www.baptistboard.com/archive/index.php/t-10083.html - please think it through a little bit. I do find it interesting that the Bible explicitly says so very little if nothing (positively or negatively) about the role of games and sports in the life of His children. Paul does use athletics in metaphors, but I can’t see (and neither can the scholarly article) how that necessarily equates with endorsement. The following article might not get to the crux of my topic here, but it could be found useful for further reading:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/february/3.20.html
Thanks.
Before you give up on this topic half-way through reading, check out this link where Christian scholars develop an initial probing:
http://davefagg.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Perspectives-on-Compe…
I started thinking about this in depth by myself just this week, but in research I found that article useful.
I’ve been thinking recently about the moral nature of superfluous competition, as in games and sports. I know that competition extends to other spheres such as economics, sociology, etc., but a view of those gets messier as they are more necessary to survival. Let me distill my inquiry into a simple question:
Is harnessing prideful ambition via competition justifiable under any unnecessary circumstance?
So I’m not arguing against the extreme behavior in sports that many decry today, like college athletics scandals, fighting spectator parents, and steroid use. I’m questioning the very nature of induced competition. Let me give a small and simple example to show what I mean: a thumb war. By locking fingers, are we not agreeing to fight for supremacy over each other? Do we not win by making the other person fail? Do we not rejoice as we succeed as the other person fails? Is this Christian behavior? It might be done to further a bond, but is this a good goal accomplished by infusing prideful ambition into the mix?
Now take a regular sport, like soccer. Yes, many would make the case that of lots of positive ends are being achieved by playing: physical benefits, social benefits, character benefits, etc., but do positive ends justify a prideful ambition means? In fact, a player’s chief aims might be to simply stay in shape and grow in relationships, or to even ultimately glorify the Lord, but am I not saying,
“I will run to these ends by putting the carrot stick of prideful accomplishment before myself.” ?
Now, let me add a disclaimer here. I am not fully sold on this, but I find it worth thinking through. I have studied P.E. in college (among other things), worked as an Activities Director at two different Christian camps, played plenty of sports, received numerous sports awards, coached, and have been beaten in bowling by my grandma without crying, so this isn’t a personal axe to grind against competition. I want to be an antagonist of sorts that represents a compelling view of this argument, not so much because I want to convince you of this position, but because in representing this position well, you can help me to find if there are holes in this thinking. I’ve thought of different arguments myself, but I want to be the antagonist for now.
And before you laugh the question away or offer mostly knee-jerk reactions like in a forum I found with a similar question here (I have no relation that I know of to the questioner)-
http://www.baptistboard.com/archive/index.php/t-10083.html - please think it through a little bit. I do find it interesting that the Bible explicitly says so very little if nothing (positively or negatively) about the role of games and sports in the life of His children. Paul does use athletics in metaphors, but I can’t see (and neither can the scholarly article) how that necessarily equates with endorsement. The following article might not get to the crux of my topic here, but it could be found useful for further reading:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/february/3.20.html
Thanks.
I found this Wikipedia article that concerns the history of sports in Christianity interesting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscular_Christianity
I’m still trying to work through a Christian idea of competition. Any thoughts?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscular_Christianity
I’m still trying to work through a Christian idea of competition. Any thoughts?
Scot McKnight on sports in Christianity: http://blog.beliefnet.com/jesuscreed/2010/02/christians-sports-and-comp…
In thinking on this, it seems like some of what it comes down to is whether we can lawfully create our own world where Christian ethics don’t necessarily reign. In other words, by you and I agreeing to compete, we are forming a contractual agreement to enter into a new paradigm. As peers, say co-workers or fellow students, we don’t want to kill and triumph over each other normally; we have a tacit agreement to help each other succeed; but by entering into a competition, we form a tacit agreement to try to defeat each other by any means within the laws of the new paradigm. Normally, it’s not okay for us to steal from each other. In our competition (say basketball), that’s encouraged. Normally, it’s not okay for us to try to triumph over each other and make each other fail. In the new paradigm, that’s the whole point (at least the triumphing part). On the other side, running with a ball is not a forbidden activity to Christians, but in basketball, it is; it’s called “traveling”. We also condemn violating the paradigm by cheating in a sneaky way, like miscounting the score or putting a sleeping pill in my Powerade. Now, once the game is over, the paradigm contract is suspended, and we shake hands and say “good game”. Back to normal life as people that hopefully care about each other and want each other to succeed. This type of thing is one of the big things that I’m trying to work through, and Scot McKnight has the same idea of a new, false world, while finding it permissive and helpful in the life of a Christian.
So can Christians do this? Can we construct new paradigms where Christian ethos don’t necessarily apply (or do, but in a molded form) in order to enhance our Christian life as a whole? Or should we say, “Un-Christian is un-Christian”. No new paradigms allowed. We should just submit to the paradigm that God gave us and leave it at that.
Here’s a couple other articles relevant to the discussion (well, here a monologue at this point) as a whole:
Recreation in the life of the Puritans: http://www.chestertonhouse.org/files/Johnson_PuritanPlay.pdf
More on “Muscular Christianity”: http://www.infed.org/christianeducation/muscular_christianity.htm
In thinking on this, it seems like some of what it comes down to is whether we can lawfully create our own world where Christian ethics don’t necessarily reign. In other words, by you and I agreeing to compete, we are forming a contractual agreement to enter into a new paradigm. As peers, say co-workers or fellow students, we don’t want to kill and triumph over each other normally; we have a tacit agreement to help each other succeed; but by entering into a competition, we form a tacit agreement to try to defeat each other by any means within the laws of the new paradigm. Normally, it’s not okay for us to steal from each other. In our competition (say basketball), that’s encouraged. Normally, it’s not okay for us to try to triumph over each other and make each other fail. In the new paradigm, that’s the whole point (at least the triumphing part). On the other side, running with a ball is not a forbidden activity to Christians, but in basketball, it is; it’s called “traveling”. We also condemn violating the paradigm by cheating in a sneaky way, like miscounting the score or putting a sleeping pill in my Powerade. Now, once the game is over, the paradigm contract is suspended, and we shake hands and say “good game”. Back to normal life as people that hopefully care about each other and want each other to succeed. This type of thing is one of the big things that I’m trying to work through, and Scot McKnight has the same idea of a new, false world, while finding it permissive and helpful in the life of a Christian.
So can Christians do this? Can we construct new paradigms where Christian ethos don’t necessarily apply (or do, but in a molded form) in order to enhance our Christian life as a whole? Or should we say, “Un-Christian is un-Christian”. No new paradigms allowed. We should just submit to the paradigm that God gave us and leave it at that.
Here’s a couple other articles relevant to the discussion (well, here a monologue at this point) as a whole:
Recreation in the life of the Puritans: http://www.chestertonhouse.org/files/Johnson_PuritanPlay.pdf
More on “Muscular Christianity”: http://www.infed.org/christianeducation/muscular_christianity.htm
Discussion