Book Review - The Masculine Mandate: God's Calling to Men

[amazon 156769120X thumbnail]

Ever see a sign that said “Men Needed”? Probably not, but we certainly should see them. In his new book The Masculine Mandate: God’s Calling to Men, Richard Phillips says this is exactly what we need—men. Phillips contends that we don’t merely need the kind of men that like to hike, camp or hunt, but the kind of men that God has called men to be: godly, manly men. Phillips believes that both the secular and Christian cultures have watered down and miscommunicated God’s idea of a man. Using both exegesis and application, Phillips explains the “masculine mandate” and how it applies to the life of a man.

In the first section, Phillips starts in Genesis 2 and identifies four essential aspects of a man.

  1. Who man is: He is created by God from the dust of the ground and in His image.
  2. Where man is: God placed man in the garden.
  3. What man is: As mandated by God, man is a lord over creation and is God’s servant.
  4. How man obeys God: Man obeys God by working and keeping the garden.

It is the fourth aspect of man—obedience through work—which Phillips concentrates on during the first section of the book. With Genesis 2:15 as the foundation, Phillips says, “We are to devote ourselves to working/building and keeping/protecting everything placed into our charge” (p. 12). The two concepts of working and keeping are the basis around which God gives man his calling and purpose. Similarly foundational to these concepts is the fact that man was created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26-17). From this, Phillips states the purpose of man:

[It is] revealing the glory of God to a sin-darkened world so that He will be praised and that lost sinners will be saved by coming to know the Lord. The great purpose of our lives is to reveal the glory and grace of God both by what we do and who we are. (p. 34)

Family

In the second part, Phillips explores how the masculine mandate is applied to a man’s life. First, there is his marriage as an institution created by God. While discussing the purpose for God’s creation of an Eve for Adam, Phillips rightly points out that God did not create her as a companion or mate but rather a helper: “God said Adam needed a ‘helper’ because it places the primary emphasis on the shared mandate to work and keep God’s creation under the man’s leadership” (p. 58).

As a helper, women are equal as persons and yet God created them with complimentary differences to help in the fulfillment of God’s mandate. Phillips emphasizes that a man needs to pursue a woman (as in, a wife) and not just a career. A second concern is his marriage as cursed by sin. Phillips notes that when Eve presented the fruit to Adam to eat “he thought he must choose between the woman and God, between the gift (the woman) and the Giver” (p. 68). The curse has put a strain on marriage but has not diminished its inherent created goodness. Phillips explains that the curse has affected the marriage relationship by God drawing the man “unwholesomely away from the woman, even as God’s curse on the woman draws her unwholesomely toward the man” (p. 73). A third topic is a man’s ministry in his marriage. Based on Ephesians 5:26, Phillips challenges the Christian man to have a “nurturing ministry of love toward his wife” (p. 83).

Moving from a man’s marriage to his children, Phillips applies the masculine mandate to men as nurturers of their hearts towards Christ and keepers of their hearts from sin (p. 94). A father must both discipline and disciple his children. Phillips expands these two principles and gives many insightful points of application. For example, as a worker, a father is to disciple his children. A father must be a loving minister to his children so they will receive his faith in Christ and make it their own (p. 95). As a keeper, a father is to discipline his children. It is through a father’s words that he will have the greatest impact on his children. Conversely, it is with his words that he can provoke his children to wrath in the worst way. “The most common way for a father to provoke his child to anger is by erupting in anger himself” (p. 110).

Friendships

Phillips then moves from the family to a man’s friendships. He draws from the Biblical friendship of David and Jonathan from 1 Samuel. To be a manly friend, one must be willing to initiate friendship, ask how he can help the other and seek to encourage other men in the faith. Not only is a man to be a friend, but he is to be a churchman. Once again, applying the creational mandate to “work,” Phillips contends that men are to be about the work of the ministry of the church (p. 131). He is to be a proclaimer and protector of the truth.

Finally, the masculine mandate is summed up in his service to the Lord in all areas of his life. While he may retire from his job, he is never to retire in his service to the Lord (p. 144). He is to be a disciple and disciple-maker as long as he can until the day he dies. He is to see his calling as a gift from God and is to serve the Lord with joy and humility. A man “works” for the Lord so that he can hear Jesus say to him, “Well done, good and faithful servant. Enter into the joy of your Master” (Matt. 25:21).

I strongly recommend this book to all married and to-be married men! It should be read personally and, to give its greatest benefit, it should also be used as a small group study for men. Read it! Apply it! Share it!

Discussion

I have not read this book, so my comments can be directed to the book only as far as the review accurately presents it. First, I was pleased to see that Phillips emphasizes the idea that Adam believed he must make a choice between God’s command and God’s gift—a point often clouded or missed entirely. The principle then established is that adherence to God’s word is primary—even over the primary earthly relationship established in marriage (Genesis 2:24-25).

The difficulty I have with this and most other books that purport a call to masculinity is that much time and effort is applied to things that do not necessarily distinguish masculinity. For example, section 1 of the book relates to the Who, Where, What, and How of “essential aspects of a man.” Hmm. Do these not relate to women as well? Well, … okay, certainly Eve was created from Adam and not from dust. But it would seem that Phillips point here regarding man’s identity is related more to his imaging God (a shared identity with the woman) than to his dusty origin.

In the second part, relating to his children, Phillips says the father must discipline and disciple. Is he implying that this is in opposition to the mother who can only say, “Just wait until your father gets home!”? Seems like a little disciplining and discipling comes from the mother as well.

And then part 3—“To be a manly friend, one must be willing to initiate friendship, ask how he can help the other and seek to encourage other men in the faith.” Huh? It is only manly friendships that initiate, help, and encourage? Are women to keep away from friendships or encouragement lest they appear to be too manly?

My point is merely that if the stated intention is to define a masculine mandate, one should stick to those aspects that distinguish masculinity rather than merely present arguments for Godliness. It certainly confuses masculinity, and it diminishes any basis that the writer is wanting to present for role differences.

Dan, thanks for the comments and questions.

My understanding is that Phillips is applying the general mandate to mankind (Adam & Eve) just to what it looks like for men. After reading the book I thought to myself that it would be nice to see this applied to women as well because it certainly can.

I think this will answer your questions as well about discipline. A man is to discipline his children. While Phillips does not say it in those chapters I dont think he supports the idea that the father is to be the ONLY disciplinarian. Maybe the primary one or the leader of it in the home but not the only one.

As far as being a manly friend, Phillips is saying that a true man is to do that but not that other men (unmanly men) dont or cant as well.

Three things to keep in mind:

1. Reading the book will help clear some of this up in a way that I cant unless you read it.

2. Phillips is writing this in somewhat of a response to the “manly” portrait presented by John Eldridge in Wild at Heart (I agree with Phillips response to this book as I have read it myself).

3. Like the mandate God gave to Adam & Eve as well as the image bearing they both carry, godliness can be both generally carried out by men & women alike but gender differences enable each sex to display some characteristics in a way that the other cannot. This is certainly the case for being made in God’s image and fulfilling the creation mandate to fill and keep. It may be less evident when living a godly life. However, if living a godly life for a women includes (but is not limited to) her fulfilling her part in the creation mandate and image bearing then there are differences in how each sex lives out their godliness. If I need to explain #3 in more detail with specifics I can but hopefully this will suffice.

Thanks again!