Back to Acts 2 ( Correct link now )

Thanks for your post Huw, But I fear your not getting what E.C. is saying. He is not saying those people are LOST. He is saying they are not saved as people of today are. When we are saved today, Our sin is covered by the blood of Christ. Its a done deal. But read the following from Acts. And take note that the person that wrote Acts KNEW Jesus had been here. Once.

Act 3:19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord;

Act 3:20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:

Act 3:21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.

I hope you will take time to go back and hear what he (E.C. Moore) has to say. I think you will find he stays with the Word.

Thanks

E.C. Moore “The Mystery”

“WARNING: This video will make you question your denominational belief system. E.C. Moore is an evangelist out of Pensacola Florida that preaches we are not under the law but under Grace and holds steadfast to the commandment in 2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.”

http://www.youtube.com/user/BereanBibleStudyECM

Was that called for ?

Is there no one out there that can think outside tradition enough to see the problems Acts 3:19-21 pose for today’s Christian thinking ?

If you believe in pre or mid tribulation rapture. If you believe that once a person is saved their sin is nailed to the cross, ?

@James K

Mat 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

And that at least seven other so called versions leave out “Without a cause”

1-NLT But I say, if you are angry with someone,* you are subject to judgment!

2-NIV But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother*will be subject to judgment.

3-ESV But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment;

4-NASB “But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be *guilty before the court;

5-RSV But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment;

6-ASV but I say unto you, that every one who is angry with his brother shall be in danger of the judgment;

7-DBY But *I* say unto you, that every one that is lightly angry with his brother shall be subject to the judgment;

Ain’t that last one a doozy ?

Now I have had what I’d like to think were well meaning people try and tell me that this little difference don’t matter. I guess that’s all about how you look at it. God said Speak and Moses struck. That one small difference kept him from the promised land.

To leave out “Without a cause” changes the text. From the fault being in the unjust anger to being in the anger itself.

And yet the KJ Bible says-

Eph 4:26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:

To believe those, one would have to believe that Paul is saying “Sin, and sin not”. yea right.

I have shown reason for being KJVO. Just one of many. Show me a reason not to be. Its a question of faith or lack there of. I have faith in the KJV. I believe that it is the Word of God. If you do not, Stand right up and say so.