Implementing Separatist Convictions, Part 3

By Ernest Pickering (1928-2000). Read Part 1and Part 2.

The Pitfalls of Separatists

Separatists are human. They have sins. They are not perfect. While the matters about to be discussed are not problems exclusively for separatists, separatists are especially vulnerable to them by virtue of their unique position.

An improper spirit

It is possible to believe the right things, but to hold them and present them in the wrong way. Paul told us this when he spoke of those in Philippi who preached Christ “of envy and strife” and “of contention” (Philippians 1:15, 16). He was saying that he was happy for their message—Christ—but saddened by their spirit. Because separatists are in almost constant conflict in order to maintain their position against the tremendous attacks mounted against them, they can develop a spirit of bitterness and acrimony. They are under the gun most of the time, and this situation can take its toll. It is very important to be “speaking the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15). On occasion, some separatists may be long on truth and short on love.

Over-occupation with the issues

The issues are matters related to the apostasy and the response of separation. Some preachers become specialists in exposing the apostasy. They become consumed with the negative. They fail to feed upon the Word themselves, and they fail, therefore, to feed their people. The pastor is to declare “all the counsel of God” (Acts 20:27). This description means he must not major on any one theme, but must seek for a full orchestration of Biblical truth. In some separatist congregations, people starve for lack of wholesome food while their pastor rants about the issues.

Uncontrolled suspicion

Some separatists see a new evangelical under every bush and a compromiser in every other pulpit. They are constantly “uncovering the dirt” about other believers. They have just heard this, or they have just heard that. They see sinister meaning in perfectly innocent actions. It is this characteristic, probably more than any other, that is sometimes referred to by nonseparatists as part of the “separatist mentality.” We would not hesitate to confess that this characteristic could be used to describe some separatists. On the other hand, we believe that this characteristic is not the essence of separatism and that it would be most heartily repudiated by most separatist leaders.

We certainly ought not to be gullible nor should we be silent when it is required that we should speak. But we ought not to make the main emphasis of our ministry “detective work.” One can develop a suspicious attitude toward everyone that can militate against helpful interaction and constructive growth.

Certainly separatists should immerse themselves in 1 Corinthians 13. Paul made an interesting statement: Love “beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things” (v. 7). Does this statement mean we should gullibly accept whatever we are told? Does it support the idea that we should accept everyone’s Christian profession with no questions asked? No. The thrust of this verse is that we should be optimistic, hopeful, and positive in our relationships toward others—not suspicious and distrustful. If, of course, individuals show themselves through repeated actions as unworthy of trust, then we are forced to make appropriate judgments.

We believe R. C. H. Lenski had a helpful observation when he said that love “refuses to yield to suspicions of doubt. The flesh is ready to believe all things about a brother and a fellow man in an evil sense. Love does the opposite.”³ Biblical separatists are people with strong convictions. They are resolute. They have something of Elijah, John, Paul, and Jude in their natures. The very traits God uses to make them strong must be controlled, or separation can turn to fragmentation.⁴

Incorrect labels

Not everyone from whom we would be called to separate is an apostate. Nor, on the other hand, would they all be new evangelicals or liberals. The terms “new evangelical” and “liberal” are sometimes loosely employed to characterize all with whom one disagrees or all who have some practice or method deviant from the fundamentalist norm. This is not an accurate usage of the term and is an example of the techniques that sometimes bring unnecessary derision upon the heads of separatists.

Gloating over failures

On occasion some separatists seem to view with glee the uncovering of some fault in another Bible-believing servant of God. We ought to weep and not rejoice. “Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the Lord see it, and it displease him” (Proverbs 24:17, 18). If this should be our attitude toward our enemies, should it not be even more so toward our fellow believers? Paul warned his brethren “with tears” (Acts 20:31). Separatists could use a few more tears.

A desire to dominate

Separatists tend to produce some strong-willed leaders. In the conflicts of separatism, strength of will can be an asset; but it can also be a drawback. In the process of arriving at their positions of leadership, separatist leaders must guard against an insatiable desire to dominate everyone and everything and to build empires. If someone disagrees with us on some minor issue, we should resist the temptation to make a major issue of it, brand the offender as a new evangelical, and ostracize him from our fellowship. Separatists must ask God for humility. We do not know everything. We can yet learn from others. Our Lord was “meek and lowly in heart” (Matthew 11:29). We ought to emulate Him.

Hasty rejection of offenders

All separatists have made mistakes of judgment. Good men who are trying to take a stand for righteousness sometimes become involved in something or with someone who may seem inconsistent with a separatist position. They may have someone visit their pulpit who, in the judgment of other separatists, is not taking a proper stand.

Separatists need to learn to distinguish between occasional lapses or misjudgments, which are part of the frailty of human nature, and patterns of consistent compromise. The former must be looked upon with some charity, while the latter is more serious and demands a stronger stance. We ought not to make a man “an offender for a word” (Isaiah 29:21). John Ashbrook has rightly stated:

It is easy to separate from a brother because he has a speaker we would not have, supports a mission we would not support or recommends a school we would not recommend… . I have had speakers, supported missions, and recommended schools that I would not have, support, or recommend today… . Be careful not to run up the red flag for every mistake or differing decision. Wait to see if it is a pattern.⁵

Caustic language

Some separatists have evidently tried to imitate Martin Luther and other controversialists of his age (and other ages) in employing rather strong, colorful, and pungent language about their evangelical brothers and sisters. It is true that the New Testament uses some rather strong language in reference to apostates. However, separatists need to employ caution and restraint when speaking of those who are our brethren but with whom we may disagree. Tongues and pens need to be controlled by the Spirit.

A young lady once approached me in tears. She had written to a separatist leader, expressing disagreement with him on a minor point. She received a three-page diatribe in reply (which she shared) in which the man called her names and used very strong language, professing horror that anyone would dare to disagree with him. I was extremely embarrassed, since the writer of the letter was a well-known figure. “My brethren, these things ought not so to be” (James 3:10). Being a fundamentalist and battling for the faith does not give one the right to ignore plain Scriptural commands to use speech that is pleasing to God. “Let your speech be alway with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man” (Colossians 4:6). We are to be “speaking the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15). We are to put away “evil speaking” and “malice” (v. 31). No improper words ever escaped the lips of our blessed Lord. Let this be our example.

Public instead of private rebuke

At times, matters of serious import must be discussed in public, and proponents of erroneous views must be exposed in public. On the other hand, sometimes public discussion is most certainly not in order. Some separatists take to the printed page with barbs, innuendoes, and castigations of their brethren without ever checking privately and carefully to see if they have the facts straight. If a personal grievance or a compromise (real or imagined) has occurred, they make no effort to correct it privately, but simply blast away in some public organ. Broadside attacks and startling revelations about the supposed shortcomings of other brethren may make readable copy (depending upon one’s tastes), but such an approach may not be the finest and most productive method of dealing with problems. This is especially true when one is dealing with other brethren who take the same general position as they do.

Overcoming pitfalls

The matters discussed here should not in any way become a cause for the repudiation of the doctrine of separation. It rests upon a solid foundation: the Word of God. No Biblical doctrine should ever be rejected because of the faults and foibles of its advocates. However, its advocates should humbly seek the face of God and inquire about how to improve their testimony before other believers and the world. I certainly do not agree with everything that the early Baptist leader John Smyth wrote, but I think all separatists could profit by reading his last book. In it he confessed the bad spirit that characterized some of his earlier debates; and, while still maintaining what he viewed as truth and defending his right to argue for it, he pled for a proper spirit in so doing.⁶

God is concerned not only with the truth that we hold, but also with the spirit with which we hold it. When we stand before the Lord someday, He will examine “the counsels of the hearts” (1Corinthians 4:5). God desires “truth in the inward parts” (Psalm 51:6). Our prayer should be, “Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in thy sight, O Lord, my strength, and my redeemer” (Psalm 19:14). Our hearts must be pure before the Lord if we are to expect His blessing.

Some Closing Advice for Separatists

I have been involved in the separatist movement for many years. No finer group of men and women could be found anywhere, and my fellowship with them has been life-enriching and challenging. Most separatists, we believe, have a desire to do God’s will, to honor God’s Son, and to “adorn the doctrine of God” by a Spirit-filled life (Titus 2:10). How may this desire be accomplished? Here are seven suggestions.

We must base our position upon Scripture, not personal opinion

Some separatists find it difficult to separate between Scripture and personal opinion. We must avoid the danger of elevating our own personal tastes or opinions to the level of divine revelation. People with strong convictions (and most separatists are such) have difficulty distinguishing between their opinions and Scriptural principles. In an effort to avoid appearing wishy-washy or uncertain in areas of doctrine, some separatists go to an extreme and take hard, irrevocable stands on every minor issue as though it were a major item of the faith. Often they become quite emotional when confronted with the unreasonableness of their position or their attitude.

We must seek to be consistent but allow for inconsistency

It is hard for anyone to be completely consistent. We are human, and our humanness shows in our inconsistencies. Yet we need to seek to implement our separatist convictions consistently, to the best of our ability as God directs us. At the same time, we must realize that separatists are imperfect. We will sometimes say and do things with which other of our brethren will not completely agree. This does not call for immediate excommunication and isolation. It calls for conference, for prayer, and for efforts to come to an understanding.

We must allow for honest differences

Some separatists give the impression that to be a “true blue” separatist, everyone must hold the same positions and interpretations as they do. Artificial tests of fellowship are therefore created. If someone uses a different translation or approves a pantsuit or holds a different view on the question of divorce, some separatists make an international issue over it and brand the brother who differs a compromiser. We need to be able to distinguish minor points from major issues. We must be free to discuss subordinate theological issues on which we may disagree without making them a test of fellowship. Many separatists can do this. Regrettably, some cannot.

We must be factual and truthful

Vicious statements have sometimes been made about separatist and nonseparatist brethren that have no basis in fact. Our God “desirest truth in the inward parts” (Psalm 51:6). He also commands that we “speak every man truth with his neighbour” (Ephesians 4:25). In heart and lip we must be truthful. Righteous causes are not forwarded by lies. They are forwarded by truth.

We must maintain a balanced, fair view

Because a man is not a separatist does not mean that all he says or writes is worthless. For instance, Harold Lindsell’s books describing the battle over Scripture and defending the inspiration of Scripture are good books. Most of us would not endorse all of Lindsell’s associations and activities, but this does not mean we cannot benefit from what he has produced that is helpful and true to Scripture. We would not condone W. A. Criswell’s promotion of the Southern Baptist Convention, but who of us has not been blessed by some of his fine expositions of Scripture. The good qualities of a man can be appreciated without condoning his compromises. It is not a sin to declare that someone with whose position we may disagree has preached or written or performed in some way that is worthy and has been a spiritual blessing. (It does not follow, however, that we are free to use such men on our platforms, to address our churches and conferences.) Even the hireling prophet Balaam spoke some beautiful, helpful prophecies. Our Lord Himself preceded His rebuke of the Ephesian church by commending the believers there for the good things they had done (Revelation 2:2–4).

We must use winsome words, not senseless wranglings

Often public debates among fundamentalists are fueled by motives other than a desire to defend the truth. Men are instead defending their “empires,” seeking to create an image of success, and trying to put down other people in the process. Such antics must sicken the heart of God, and certainly they alienate some who might otherwise be our friends. Many arguments and discussions are neither necessary nor profitable. We need to develop the ability to distinguish between controversies that are necessary to defend the faith or protect the people of God, and controversies that are inspired by personal pique or carnal pride. God’s Word says, “A brother offended is harder to be won than a strong city: and their contentions are like the bars of a castle” (Proverbs 18:19). Considerable discussion is taking place today as to why so many younger men raised in the separatist tradition are failing to take a good position and, in some cases, are backing off from the fray. One of the major reasons, it seems to me, is that they are disgusted with the lack of discernment on the part of some separatists who cannot distinguish between what is truly crucial to fellowship and what is not crucial. Some have made mountains out of molehills and have elevated minor matters to the status of major items of the faith.

We must guard our own lives

The fact that a man is a stalwart of the faith does not provide automatic protection from the sins of the flesh. Those of us who take the Scriptural position of separation should be watchful that we do not fall prey to the Devil (Galatians 6:1). Separatists have old natures too. Powerful spokesmen for the cause of separatism have sometimes fallen into gross sin and disgraced their Lord as well as the cause that they represented. Engaged as we are in public debates over Biblical questions, it is easy to drift away from the Lord in our hearts, become callused and cold, having all the correct positions but without the heart-warmth, tenderness, and devotion that should be evidenced. Our Lord warned the believers at Ephesus that they had straight doctrine but dying love (Revelation 2:2–4).

Conclusion: Maintain a Narrow Circle with a Wide Heart

Our blessed Lord is our example. He was the great separatist. His character is described as “full of grace and truth” (John 1:14). He was perfectly balanced. He spoke gracious words and performed gracious deeds. He also spoke burning words and performed purifying deeds. He exemplified that which every separatist and every believer in Christ needs: balance. Our tendency is to become imbalanced.

C.H. Mackintosh, an English leader of the Plymouth Brethren movement, gave this cherished advice to separatists in 1856:

The grand difficulty is to combine a spirit of intense separation with a spirit of grace, gentleness, and forbearance; or, as another has said, “to maintain a narrow circle with a wide heart.” This is really a difficulty. As the strict and uncompromised maintenance of truth tends to narrow the circle around us, we shall need the expansive power of grace to keep the heart wide and the affections warm. If we contend for truth otherwise than in grace, we shall only yield a one-sided and most unattractive testimony. And, on the other hand, if we try to exhibit grace at the expense of truth, it will prove, in the end, to be only the manifestation of a popular liberality at God’s expense—a most worthless thing!⁷

Ernest Pickering (1928–2000) was a noted leader in American fundamentalism, having ministered as a pastor, seminary president, and leader in missionary organizations. He earned a ThD from Dallas Theological Seminary and was a 40-year member of the Evangelical Theological Society. This article is an excerpt from his book Biblical Separation: The Struggle for a Pure Church, published by Regular Baptist Press. This book, along with his pamphlets, articles, and additional books, have widely influenced the fundamentalist and evangelical movements.