Should Christians Drink Intoxicating Beverages? Compare the Production
Image
Read the series.
Christians need to understand the differences in the production and consumption of intoxicating beverages in Bible times compared to modern times. This difference is a significant concern that needs to be addressed as we ponder Christians and social drinking.
Christians need to understand the differences in the production and consumption of intoxicating beverages in Bible times compared to modern times. This difference is a significant concern that needs to be addressed as we ponder Christians and social drinking.
Before we get into this, let’s do a quick recap of the first two articles in the series. Drunkenness is not an option for a follower of Jesus. This is quite plain in Scripture (see Part 1). This being understood, the question remains as to whether drinking with moderation is acceptable for a Christian. Arguments in favor of social drinking have already been discussed (see Part 2). It would be most helpful to read these two articles before continuing here.
Now we need to consider the differences in the production and consumption of intoxicating beverages in ancient times compared to today. It seems that not many Christians are aware of these differences. If they are true, these distinctions effect the discussion significantly.
Drinking Wine in Biblical Times
Wine in the Bible was alcoholic; it was fermented grape juice. Those that drank wine in Bible times could get drunk from the wine (and examples in Scripture are easy to find). However, there is a significant difference between the wine that used then and what is made in factories and distilleries today.
In ancient Bible times, water was scarce. Water that was available was often contaminated and unclean. Fermented wine was used to purify and keep the water for extended periods of time. People did not have many beverage choices like we do today.
What it took to get drunk
People did not have an abundance of fruit juices, soda, bottled water, fresh milk, or other options available all around them like we do today. Wine that was produced in ancient times was mixed with a lot of water.
When they drank the wine, the alcoholic content was not strong enough for them to become easily drunk by it. To get drunk, a person would have to drink many glasses of it. That is why in Proverbs 23 we are told that drunkards are those that linger over wine:
Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has strife? Who has complaining? Who has wounds without cause? Who has redness of eyes? Those who tarry long over wine; those who go to try mixed wine. (Prov 23:29-30)
Because of this difference in alcoholic content, Paul could encourage Timothy to drink a little wine as medicine for his stomach without concern for his becoming drunk. However, it’s worth noting that Timothy did not want to drink any wine at all until Paul persuaded him to do so for his health.
No longer drink only water, but use a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments. (1 Tim 5:23)
Now we will look at the differences in how alcoholic beverages were made in ancient times versus the present.1
How alcoholic beverages were made in ancient times
In ancient times, there was not yet the technology to distill wine to increase its alcoholic content like there is today. However, they made wine by pressing the grapes with their feet in a stone vat. They collected the grape juice into cisterns, large jars, or leather bottles where the juice fermented on its own over time. In this way the taste also improved as it fermented.
The grape harvest occurred once per year, so they needed to make wine in order to keep the grape juice good over the course of at least a year, until the next harvest. If they did not do this, the grape juice would go bad and the crop would be wasted, as the juice turned to sour vinegar, which is undrinkable.
Furthermore, it was impossible to seal up unfermented fruit juice because it began to ferment starting the very first day it was pressed in the vat. They did not yet have the technology to keep fruit juice from going sour. If they made wine, however, the juice would not be lost, because the alcohol in the wine would preserve the juice, even for many years.
How alcoholic beverages are made in modern times
In modern times many people no longer consider drunkenness a vice or even shameful. Over the course of hundreds of years, the methods and technology for increasing alcoholic content in alcoholic beverages has led to many becoming dependent upon alcohol for happiness. Drunkenness has become a normal part of life.
Today, wine makers are able to alter and select seeds, engineering grapes that have a much higher sugar content than was originally true. The extra sugar results in a much higher alcohol content in the wine because it breaks down, turning into alcohol. Sometimes wine makers even add sugar to the process to encourage higher alcohol content.
Modern, high-tech chemical machines heat and pressurize the beverage, resulting in a much higher alcohol content than would be possible through natural processes. Ethanol is also added to some kinds of alcoholic beverages, and other added gases cause the alcohol to enter the blood stream faster than normal, resulting in quicker inebriation. Modern factories are able to make an enormous volume of alcoholic beverages very quickly, lowering the price of the intoxicating drinks in the market and making the alcohol inexpensive so that buyers can drink to their heart’s content.
Contrasting the beverages of the times
The alcohol we see for sale today is very different from the wine made in ancient times. Those who produce and distribute intoxicating beverages know that intoxicating beverages will sell well and make an easy profit. They know that customers want alcoholic drinks for receptions and parties—people want them for every event. Very few people can drink these beverages in today’s world and not get drunk, at least sometimes.
With these differences in mind, It is no surprise that frequent alcohol abuse has become a huge problem in many societies. For example, as of 2021 in the United States, 29.5 million people ages 12 and older (10.6% in this age group) had “alcohol use disorder” in the previous year. The research also says that approximately 10.5% (7.5 million) of U.S. children ages 17 and younger live with a parent who has alcohol use disorder (See: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism).
When we, as believers in Jesus Christ, read His Word and come across the word “wine,” let us not equate it mentally with modern alcoholic beverages – beer, wine, whiskey, or other liquor. The substances are not the same. Jesus did not turn the water in those pitchers into the kinds of intoxicating beverages that we are so familiar with at the world’s parties in our time. The apostle Paul did not insist that Timothy drink beer, hard liquor, or anything else that you see sold at stores and markets around the world today.
For an accessible and yet well-documented explanation of these differences in production, see Dr. Randy Jaeggli’s book, Christians and Alcohol.2
These differences should give pause
As believers take all of this in, they have to reckon with the reality that what people are drinking in their homes, restaurants, sporting events, backyard barbeques, and bars in today’s world is quite different from what is being described to us in the Scriptures. Jesus, David, Peter, and Jacob were not drinking the same thing. This should give us pause.
If the differences in alcoholic beverages then and now really are significant, it should cause Christians to give greater attention to other arguments from those urging abstinence. In the next article, we will look at other biblical arguments that favor abstinence.
Notes
1 Credit goes to Michael Carlyle for his help in concisely laying out this explanation here.
2 This book dives deep into all related Biblical texts, the original languages, and ANE (Ancient Near Eastern) cultural studies that come to bear on this topic in Scripture. He also gives helpful illustrations throughout. Many research sources are cited as well.
Rooted Thinking Articles
Reposted from Rooted Thinking.
Forrest McPhail Bio
Forrest has served as a missionary in Buddhist Cambodia in Southeast Asia since 2000. He presently serves as the Asia/Australia/Oceania regional director for Gospel Fellowship Association missions. He enjoys writing and teaching on missions and the Buddhist worldview. He and his wife, Jennifer, have 4 children.
- 1976 views
Craig, I’m in agreement with you that Deut. 14:26 clearly answers the question of whether or not drinking alcohol is always wrong. Of course, it has to be taken together with all the other verses giving us warnings as well (and I’m not saying you are suggesting otherwise).
New Christians, particularly immature ones, usually want to know only if the Bible forbids or allows alcohol in beverages. If it’s allowed, then they don’t want to countenance any restrictions. Of course, the Bible is much more nuanced on this topic than most want to deal with. Many pastors don’t like to mention the verses that talk about alcohol in any positive fashion, as they feel that will give the impression that they are approving of any use of it, which will lead to license rather than biblical liberty.
Like Dan said above, we need to be much more careful than to assume that all people on either side of this issue (and this applies double to people on the other side than our own) want to justify their own point of view rather than wanting to get to what scripture actually says in order to obey it.
Dave Barnhart
Dave's comment about not seeing possibilities between drunkenness/alcoholism and abstinence is the excluded middle, and it's common in our circles. It's not a simple question of whether one can wear blue jeans; it's the question of whether allowing it will result in our communities going "full hippie" or "Woodstock". It's not a question of whether a bit of modern music is permissible and advisable; it's the question of whether it'll result in our church services becoming all "hip-hop" and death metal.
I have to suggest that our "tribes" would have far less strife if we believed we could find a "happy medium". And back to this subject, a glass of wine gets one to .02-.04% BAC, depending on one's size and gender (less if one is really heavy), too drunk to drive is .08% BAC, and the level described in Proverbs 23 is 0.15-0.2% BAC.
And that's your criteria for "do you have the freedom to drink?", in my view. If you can't sit down to a glass of wine without drinking enough to be a bad candidate for driving, or getting so plastered you can't feel it when you fall down, abstain. Or if you simply don't want to bother, abstain.
Or if you can hold back, and enjoy it, and can afford it, go ahead. Enjoy.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
To clarify, this would not be the excluded middle. The law of the excluded middle means there is no middle between A and not A. Dave is saying A therefore B, I don't think that works, but the law of the excluded middle is important to keep distinct.
Otherwise carry on.
While that post may have been a little muddled, my main point was to address those Christians on either end of the discussion who assume that people from the opposite point of view only want to justify their position rather than come to a realization that other believers who want to understand and obey the scriptures can have a difference of opinion given the number of different scriptures on this topic.
Personally, I don’t agree with either those who are prohibitionists, or those who think any use of alcohol short of drunkenness is perfectly OK. I’m not sure I can get to an exact excluded middle on this without reframing the argument, as prohibition and abstention are two different things, as are moderate use and any use.
I believe the scriptures indicate that a “middle” position on this topic can result in either abstentionists or moderate partakers, and I can happily get along with either. And I further believe that those who partake moderately also need to consider the testimony and stumblingblock passages to know when they can or should restrict their liberty for the sake of others. I don’t agree with the arguments that “wisdom” would indicate it’s a sin to ever partake today, or that considering others means only abstention is acceptable.
I’m not sure where I’m saying A therefore B, unless you are referring to what I said about Deut. 14:26. Just because I believe that passage indicates that at least one use of alcohol is acceptable (which to me clearly means it’s not always wrong), I certainly don’t think that verse indicates that unrestricted use of alcohol up to the point of drunkenness is perfectly fine for the believer. It’s not addressing all uses of alcohol. That’s why we have other scriptures to fill in some of the blanks.
Dave Barnhart
My point wasn't that your ethical case was wrong, it was that you shouldn't describe it as the law of the excluded middle. That is a hard and fast rule of logic that is always true--in logic the middle ground on the truth value of a proposition doesn't exist--a proposition is either true or false, there is no middle ground between true or false.
What you are describing isn't the law of the excluded middle, however, so it's best not to describe it that way, which was my point. You are noting a tension between what you (and I for that matter) believe to be two different, but both true propositions.
1. The Bible doesn't condemn all use of alcohol.
2. Drunkenness is condemned in Scripture.
I could add
3. The Bible appears to endorse moderate use of alcohol in some instances.
Might I suggest what you are looking for is something Aristotle called the Golden Mean, that a virtue is the proper balance between two vices. The classic example is that courage is the mean between recklessness and cowardice.
I am surprised that we're only just now getting to the most important thing in the entire conversation - the definition of the word wine. A lot of time could have been saved if it were made clear that there isn't even agreement on that question. If we can't agree on the definition of the word, then further argument is impossible. In this case, the definition involves something that is impossible for us to know - the percentage of alcohol content, per unit volume, in the wine consumed by anyone referenced in the Bible. This means we are left with the only remaining consideration on this topic: conscience.
I am not saying the first installments of this series are not helpful - they certainly are, and I really appreciate the tone and the manner in which the positions are presented. But I am expecting the series to end in the same place so many other controversial topics end.
Ashamed of Jesus! of that Friend On whom for heaven my hopes depend! It must not be! be this my shame, That I no more revere His name. -Joseph Grigg (1720-1768)
Discussion