My Three Sons - Canaan and the Curse

Read Part 1.

So Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him. 25 Then he said: “Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants He shall be to his brethren.” 26 And he said: “Blessed be the LORD, The God of Shem, And may Canaan be his servant. 27 May God enlarge Japheth, And may he dwell in the tents of Shem; And may Canaan be his servant.” (NKJV, Genesis 9:24–27)

Canaan, son of Ham

By divine inspiration, Noah uttered his first prophecy about Canaan and his descendants: “He said, ‘Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers’” (Gen. 9:25). The observant reader at this point will ask an obvious question: If Ham committed the act, why is his son Canaan cursed?

This important question is not directly answered in the immediate context. No reason is stated why a son of Ham is cursed and not Ham himself. Perhaps the reason is that as Noah was dishonored by one of his sons, so Ham will be dishonored by one of his own sons. Or, perhaps Noah prophetically saw that Canaan and his descendants would reproduce the sensuous character of their father Ham more than his other descendants. Biblical history and archaeology do inform us that the Canaanites proved to be an ungodly and sensuous group (see Gen. 15:16; Lev. 18). Or, perhaps since Genesis 9:1 states that God had already blessed Noah and his sons (including Ham), it would be impossible for Ham himself to then be cursed (see Num. 23:20).

Whatever the reason God through Noah prophetically cursed Canaan, it is important to notice that not all of Ham’s descendants were placed under a curse of servitude and bondage (the phrase “servant of servants” describes the most severe slavery imaginable!) From Genesis 10:6 we learn that Ham had three other sons: Cush, Mizraim and Put. In Genesis 10:7-14 their sons are listed and we do know where they settled. Cush refers to Ethiopia; Mizraim refers to Egypt; and Put refers to North Africa/Libya. Thus, three of Ham’s sons and their descendants settled in Africa.

Their brother Canaan’s descendants, however, did not settle in Africa, but in the land to which they gave their father’s name—the land of Canaan! It was this land that God later promised to Abraham, a descendant of Shem (Gen. 12:5-7; 15:18-21). Later, Joshua conquered this land and placed the Canaanites under forced slave labor (Josh. 9:23). Even later, Solomon followed the same practice by enslaving the surviving Canaanites in his day (1 Kings 9:20-21). Thus, the prophetic curse of slavery was literally fulfilled on the Canaanites. The curse, therefore, applies to no ethnic group in existence today. The mistaken idea that Ham’s African descendants are cursed is a myth too often repeated even to this day!

Sadly, there still survives, especially in the Southern U.S., an idea that African Americans are somehow under the curse of Ham—the curse that never was!

[node:bio/will-varner body]

2348 reads

There are 4 Comments

Rob Fall's picture

slavery and its post ACW premutations was based on three legs: bad science (Darwinism "monkey people"), bad theology (the curse of Ham; they were elected to being slaves), and greed.

Sadly, there still survives, especially in the Southern U.S., an idea that African Americans are somehow under the curse of Ham—the curse that never was!

Hoping to shed more light than heat..

Aaron Blumer's picture

EditorAdmin

Can't speak for Rob, but maybe by ACW he means American Civil War.

Rob Fall's picture

ACW is American Civil War.  "its post Civil War permutations" refers to the Jim Crow laws and the violence against former slaves and their descendants.  These sought to keep African Americans "in their proper place." But were nothing  more than permutations of the violence associated with enforcement of slavery.

Michelle wrote:

Sorry. What are ACW premutations?

Hoping to shed more light than heat..

Help keep SI’s server humming. A few bucks makes a difference.