Skip to main content
SHARPER IRON
“As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.” (Proverbs 27:17)
  • About
    • About Sharper Iron
    • Doctrinal Statement
    • Contact
    • Search
  • Forum
    • Forum Home
    • Comment Guidelines
    • Search
  • Account
    • Log in
    • Register

Supreme Court Lets California Return to Church Indoors

By Filings on Sat, 02/06/21
Church & Ministry
Church COVID Restrictions
California
Supreme Court
Religious Liberty

“Justices lift the total ban on indoor worship, though capacity limits and singing restrictions remain.” - C. Today

Discussion

User image
JDen

NewMy understanding

Sat, 02/06/21

The Christianty Today article sounds wonderful from a religious liberty standpoint, but the actual sources from SCOTUS (here and here) only specifically mention that the “applicants” (i.e. the churches that brought the cases) are granted injunctive relief, and that relief is temporary, depending on the Court’s future actions.

I found this explanation by legal expert Dan Easton to be helpful. Easton notes that “technically” this order only applies to the “applicants” but he deems it unlikely that the State of California will enforce the ban on indoor services.

Legal research is not my forte. If there are any legal scholars out there who can inform my understanding, I’d greatly appreciate it.

User image
J. Baillet

NewInjunctive Not Final Relief

Sun, 02/07/21

The Supreme Court ruling is on an application for injunctive relief until the case on its final merits can be presented. This generally involves a weighing of the harm to the applicants from not granting injunctive relief versus the harm to other interested parties from granting relief, taking into account the likelihood that the applicants will ultimately prevail on the merits and any public policy considerations. Technically, this decision only applies to the applicants but as a practical matter it sets the current limits of what the State of California can do across the board until a final decision is rendered. The opinions do give a hint at how each Justice will vote when the case is fully presented and what the applicants need to show on the merits if they are to gain greater protections in the final decision, such as demonstrating that the ban on singing is not applied in other similar circumstances, just on those singing in church.

JSB

User image
JDen

NewThanks

Mon, 02/08/21

Thanks for your reply, J. Baillet. On Saturday evening, the State of California revised the guidelines for houses of worship. The most restrictive tier now allows for indoor gathering at 25% of capacity. The full guidance is in the process of being updated, so it is possible that the State may make some further changes. But for now, there is no real difference for churches between the most restrictive and second-most restrictive tiers in California. In short, churches can once again legally meet indoors in California!

User image
J. Baillet

NewAnd that is good news!

Mon, 02/08/21

And that is good news!

JSB

Related . . .

Topics: Coronavirus, Church COVID Restrictions, UK
  • Churches in England to close for public worship
  • Supreme Court vacates ruling against church suing California over worship limits
  • Supreme Court Lifts California Restrictions on Private Religious Gatherings
  • Church vs. Public Health Orders: A Case for Complying and Resisting
  • John MacArthur's church has multiple COVID cases, staff pressured to keep silent: report

Pagination

  • Page 1
  • Next page

A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.

(ESV, Proverbs 18:2)

Footer

  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Forum

Since 2005

Image
2005 SI Logo Image