Sam Horn, Les Ollila, Mike Harding speakers at BJU 2014 Bible Conference
Could one of these men become the next president of BJU?
that be Mike Harding, not Mark Harding?
–— Mod Note ––
Corrected to Mike. Thanks [Jim Peet]
–––––––-
and to mmartin,
I doubt that any of these people are candidates. Most of them are either too old or don’t fit the requirements. The only potential candidate that I see are Harding and Horn(no relation). Dr. Horn is currently president of Central Seminary, so I would not think that he is a likely candidate. The presidential search information can be found on BJU’s website
until Mike finds out he is too old… :D
Hey Mike, I didn’t say that, just quoting someone else…
BTW, like the Great Lakes area representation…
SamH
It’s been a while since I made the journey for Bible Conference at BJU, but this is the first time I recall a Conference with no Joneses or BJU faculty members.
"Some things are of that nature as to make one's fancy chuckle, while his heart doth ache." John Bunyan
I don’t know if the speakers mentioned above are being considered for the Presidency at BJU, but I’d love to see any of the three in that slot. I kind of doubt that Dr. Ollila would take it, but Drs. Horn and Harding would be good fits, I think.
Of course, if Dr. Harding was selected, we’d probably lose his involvement with SI…but that might be a huge incentive for him to take the spot if it’s offered! :D
"Our task today is to tell people — who no longer know what sin is...no longer see themselves as sinners, and no longer have room for these categories — that Christ died for sins of which they do not think they’re guilty." - David Wells
I hope Dr. Horn stays as Central.
[SamH]until Mike finds out he is too old…
Hey Mike, I didn’t say that, just quoting someone else…
BTW, like the Great Lakes area representation…
Sam,
If you reread my original post, You will see that I identified Mike Harding as one of two potential future presidents(in my perspective) at this Bible Conference. Also, please note that I said most, not all, most does not equal all.
Discussion