Seven Years and Counting

SharperIron launched in January of 2005 and is now seven years old.

For me, the experience has been broadly—and sometimes intensely—educational. In the early years, that experience involved writing monthly, reading weekly and dropping into the forums once in a while. In the spring of ‘08 my involvement increased steeply. SI quickly became a technical, financial, and interpersonal challenge. Though I’ve often felt a bit out of my league, the challenges have never failed to be interesting. They have also rarely failed to teach me things. I’m grateful for that.

The site has been on a journey from day one. The question I ponder fairly often lately is, where has it been headed and where is it headed now? If I can borrow a phrase from a real leader (George H. W. Bush), “the vision thing” often eludes me.

As with any new thing, a website only gets to make the Really Big Splash—the everybody quickly discovering it splash—once (if at all). And SI did have quite a splash in ‘05 and ‘06. We’re well past those days now and have to think more in terms of what long term contribution we can make to conservative Christianity in general and fundamentalism in particular.

Your thoughts on what that contribution should be are most welcome.

In its unique and relatively small way, the site can encourage (and has encouraged) accessible, thoughtful writing and discussion—as a means of believers sharpening one another. Beyond that, it isn’t clear to me what a website like this one can do. But I remain open to discovering more.

Something we need

Speaking of accessible, thoughtful writing, consider this an open casting call for writers. Though we continue to find some pretty good stuff in the work of various bloggers as well as some print publications (such as Baptist Bulletin and Voice), SI could use more work that is exclusive and arrives at regular intervals.

So if you’re tired of blogging on your own but would like an outlet once a month or once a quarter, send us a sample of your writing. The best stuff is concise, passionate, timely and accessible (no advanced theological education required)—yet pushes readers a bit into areas of study that are unfamiliar or only marginally familiar.

But we’re not solely interested in “issues” and cerebral content. Reflection on how truth applies personally—in experience—is no less important than thinking about assertions, arguments, and evidence. I happen to think the latter is undervalued in our age—and in fundamentalism in particular—but in our efforts to correct that imbalance, we shouldn’t create another by neglecting “the thinking of the heart.”

It’s all thinking, and, to me, that’s what SharperIron is about.

If you’ve never been interested in blogging but would like to get your writing in front of the Internet readership a bit, SI may be a good opportunity for you as well. We’ve never entirely fit the blog mold.

Some coming changes

Aside from cosmetic changes, the Forums at SharperIron have remained essentially unchanged for seven years. That’s something like half a century in Web years. The team reached a consensus some time ago that a forum relaunch would be a good idea.

Accordingly, look for that to happen sometime in June. The plan so far involves shutting the forums down for a while (not more than a couple weeks probably) to redesign and reopen—hopefully with a little fanfare (needed: experts in “the fanfare thing”).

Redesign ideas include shrinking the number of categories, introducing some new ones, giving users more ability to tag and interrelate threads, giving the forums more front page visibility and perhaps interfacing better with Facebook and Twitter—and of course, a visual update (including more industry-standard post-formatting tools; think WYSIWYG).

Your ideas on these improvements and other ways to improve the forum experience are most welcome.

In the months leading up to the Forum relaunch, expect to see some design updates to other parts of the site.

Identity questions

Along the way, critics have accused SI of having an anti-fundamentalist bias, of being a secretly neo-evangelical organization, etc. The criticism resembles truth in one respect: we’ve always had readers and forum participants who were not what some fundamentalists would include in their definition of “fundamentalist.”

And we’ve always been interested in helping fundamentalism by challenging it, rather than simply lauding it. (Certainly fundamentalists should understand the value of challenging people—it’s just that, as a movement at least, we’ve preferred to major on challenging those outside rather than those inside. But those days are pretty much over.)

One conversation the Team has had more than once concerns whether we should re-characterize the site from being “for” fundamentalists to being “hosted by fundamentalists.” It’s evident that this shift would involve some trade-offs. On the positive side, the change would free us from the perception that we need to define in some way who is a fundamentalist and who is not when we decide who may participate in discussions.

Also on the positive side, there can be little doubt that the segment of Christianity willing to openly style itself “fundamentalist” is shrinking. So, de-emphasizing the fundamentalist identity of those who participate in discussions has the potential to open us up to a larger field of potential joiners.

And “hosted by fundamentalists” rather than “existing for fundamentalists” has the additional advantage of more accurately describing how many of us see the status quo—that is, to a lot of us, the site has had not-quite-fundamentalists participating in various ways from day one.

The decision hasn’t been made yet (and really involves a pretty minor tweak to how we “brand” the site in any case). So consider this a not very subtle trial balloon. In any case, those who run the site are, and fully intend to remain, fundamentalists (in the strictly-peaceful, not hurt anybody or blow anything up sense!).

To sum up, from my point of view, it’s been a pretty interesting and fun seven years and I look forward to days as good—or better—ahead. Thanks to all of you who have been readers, writers, commenters, moderators, editors, and admins since ‘05. Thanks to the high-energy, entrepreneurial guys who got the site started. Thanks even to detractors who have prompted many team conversations that would have otherwise been pretty dull (though dull is really nice sometimes).

Most of all, thanks to God for putting us in such an interesting world, giving us minds, and encouraging us to imitate Him—in our small, weak ways—by thinking, creating, interacting, and persuading.

Aaron Blumer Bio

Aaron Blumer, SharperIron’s second publisher, is a Michigan native and graduate of Bob Jones University (Greenville, SC) and Central Baptist Theological Seminary (Plymouth, MN). He and his family live in a small town in western Wisconsin, not far from where he pastored Grace Baptist Church for thirteen years. He is employed in customer service for UnitedHealth Group and teaches high school rhetoric (and sometimes logic and government) at Baldwin Christian School.

Discussion

JG,

You must be trying to inject humor. Normally we would take this to the parking lot:-) But since much of Fundamentalism takes a tighter line than the Bible I’ll let it slide.

Blessings,

Steve

Ah - another 7 years of sweet fellowship around the SI campfire and from the comfort of my “Lawn 4000!”

It’s OK that we like our marshmellows a little different - JG being a little more of a “tough fundamentalist” no doubt likes his burnt. Steve - being on the more soft end likes his mushy. It’s all good - everyone’s enjoying koinonia and it always taste good no matter how you prepare it! Allow me to pour you both a nice cup of coffee. See…..this isn’t hard! :)

This is much nicer than when wer’re all “bothered” and throwing marshmellows at each other! I mean I know it’s sometimes fun but you do realize when we have those kinds of discussions the “outsiders” must think we’re all nuts……I’ll say nothing of the obvious implication there. :)

Straight Ahead gang!

jt

Dr. Joel Tetreau serves as Senior Pastor, Southeast Valley Bible Church (sevbc.org); Regional Coordinator for IBL West (iblministry.com), Board Member & friend for several different ministries;

Joel’s talking marshamallows when after 7 years its time for cake!

SI is far from perfect but it has been a place that has fostered some helpful conversations. It has been a place where God’s fundamentalist, Bible-believing people have been able to see that the Kingdom is bigger than their bubble. One of the things I have appreciated about this place is the numbers of men younger than I who are mature and passionate about picking up their crosses and following Jesus in reaching this world with his Gospel. You have been a challenge and a blessing to me. I have also re-connected with people I knew in college and seminary. What a blessing it has been to see some of you again and read about your efforts to serve God. One more highlight has been the new friendships. These friendships have been meaningful relationships where there is genuine care, patience, and challenges to sharper my iron.

Oh, I had better mention the benefit of resources through SI. Because of the multi-faceted functions of this site, I have been able to access articles, ministry websites, books,and other resources that have helped me in the ministry.

It is a great place. I have worked with Jason and Aaron on that there are good and sound motives behind leading this site. I also interact with the moderators and know their desires to see this site used of the Lord.

[Pastor Joe Roof] One of the things I have appreciated about this place is the numbers of men younger than I who are mature and passionate about picking up their crosses and following Jesus in reaching this world with his Gospel.
Joe,

Thanks for recognizing us younger guys. Didn’t know you were that old :-)

Steve

Marshmallow would be marshmellow and borrow would be barrow… and separate would be sepperate.

But we’re stuck with English for now I guess.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

I missed Joel’s article on the types of fundamentalists. I’d love to have a link to it. I definitely agree that terms can be a barrier to fellowship even when we agree with each other on a particular subject but define terms differently. Sadly we can end up ready to debate a subject based on a preconceived notion about a term, only to find out we actually agree with the other party but are just speaking a little bit different language. That sometimes happens with the term “fundamentalist.” Other times we end up using the same language as another person, but realize that we are saying something totally different. That too happens with the term “fundamentalist.”

I now have a bit more clarity on where you are going with “hosted by fundamentalists” and I am quite open to the idea. I am learning that when I have a question about a position, that I need to ask questions and not just make assumptions about what someone else is saying. This site provides an excellent forum for doing just that. Again thank you to all those who work up front and behind the scenes at SI.

I never knew Joel liked nuts in his s’mores. I think that is what his post means, though. I’m sure of it. No other interpretation of his words makes any sense.

Hey Steve- I still think I am young but when I pray monthly with a group of Pastors and I am the oldest guy there. I’m 44 until June and have been in the ministry for 20 years. Hopefully, by God’s grace, will have “miles to go before I sleep.”

Aaron said:

we could use some help coordinating a nice “forum relaunch whoopydoo” (I can’t seem to find a correct spelling for whoop e do).
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whoop-de-do] whoop–de–do

noun

\ˌh(w)üp-dē-ˈdü, ˌh(w)u̇p-, -tē-\

Definition of WHOOP-DE-DO

1: noisy and exuberant or attention-getting activity (as at a social affair or in a political campaign)

2: a lively social affair

3: agitated public discussion or debate

*****

If the change is made to “hosted by” and some major formatting changes will be made to the website/forums, perhaps an opportunity should be made available for current and former participants who might not be so “whoopy” about the new “do” to no longer be listed as registered users. This sort of “tidying up the rolls” would more accurately reflect the names of those in agreement with the new scope rather than grandfathering in the disaffected who have already left SI (figuratively) or current participants who might desire to do so if a change such as this is made. Or perhaps registrants could be given the choice to be designated as either “former” or “current” if it’s problematic to actually delete names.

Best way to unregister has generally been contact us and ask to be unregistered. I’m not sure there is any better way.

But if there are some strong objections to focusing the fundamentalist identity on those hosting/leading the site vs. everybody who posts, I’d certainly be interested in hearing the whys and wherefores, as they say. So far, I haven’t gotten much to think about on that side of the question.

As for the whoopedoo… has more to do w/the forum relaunch, not the slight “brand adjustment”… which is probably not substantial enough to put the balloons and crepe paper up for.

(I should say too, that changes being explored to the site look and feel are not on the large scale… this one focuses on the forums and the rest is some cosmetic fine tuning)

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

How about apple-bobbing and charades? Cake? I suppose not those either. Oh well.

Thanks for the info regarding unregistering. That explains why when I tried to do a people search using the “former user” selection in the role category it didn’t list anyone. I thought that because it was a search option, there were actually people with that designation.

Has to be a bug in there… there should be some “formers.” (Will check that out) The reason is that, as you mentioned above, when someone asks to be unregistered, we usually change the status to former and deactivate. This is so we don’t have have weird holes where posts used to be and people quoting nobody, etc. So the threads still make sense and it’s generally clear who posted what.

Edit: yes, there was a problem with multiple filters there so the “former” wasn’t showing hits. Working on it.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

So the casting call for writers has come out. I foggily (is that a word?) remember that word documents need to be sent and formatted a certain way, ect. Does anyone have and SI writing template I could download?