John MacArthur thinks he can vote for a better worldview by voting for Trump

[GregH]

Why do I feel completely under whelmed by the evidence that either of you are experts?

OK, let’s just call both of you experts so I can get something productive done.

Seriously, Greg, before you declare others’ evidence substandard, maybe try….providing some yourself? At least Joe and I are describing real situations we’ve seen. You? Bupkus.

Really, let’s just take what’s publicly known; there was confidential information on her account, plenty of it, and nobody appears to have thrown a flag at State. Moreover, someone had to have transferred some of that evidence from secure servers to servers that physically could be sent to Hilliary. Some of that information—22 emails I believe—is top secret, “born classified”, something that anyone familiar with security ought to recognize—it’s the secrecy equivalent of seeing someone stagger out of a bar with car keys in his hand. But nobody seems to have warned anyone about the problem, including (according to Wikileaks) one recipient with the initials BHO.

Now if we grant that unauthorized release of classified information can (and does) kill people, does that not bother you? Does it not bother you that nobody on the list of people who either participated in this, or who failed to warn others it was going on, is as much as losing his job? Does it not bother you that Mrs. Clinton’s response is “what does it matter”, when in fact the mistakes made now can and will be repeated if changes aren’t made?

It’s worth noting—see hearings on this and Benghazi—that most Democrats (e.g Elijah Cummings) don’t seem to be bothered by this. You vote for a Democrat, and this is in fact what you vote for; unaccountable government that gets people killed. Think about it, Greg.

Bert, honestly I think you’re wasting your time.

As does the Babylon Bee. I personally saw this glitch this morning when I voted.

[Bert Perry]

Seriously, Greg, before you declare others’ evidence substandard, maybe try….providing some yourself? At least Joe and I are describing real situations we’ve seen. You? Bupkus.

Don’t have to. I am not the one calling people criminals. Nor am I trying to prove that Hillary is not a crook. I am merely saying that you don’t know really know what you are talking about because you don’t have the facts or expertise to make judgments.

[GregH]

Bert Perry wrote:

Seriously, Greg, before you declare others’ evidence substandard, maybe try….providing some yourself? At least Joe and I are describing real situations we’ve seen. You? Bupkus.

Don’t have to. I am not the one calling people criminals. Nor am I trying to prove that Hillary is not a crook. I am merely saying that you don’t know really know what you are talking about because you don’t have the facts or expertise to make judgments.

Yup, it’s not as if you couldn’t someday end up on a jury, and certainly it’s not as if God calls you to make an informed vote. You are totally free to simply snipe from the sidelines when others present clear evidence.

If you want to prove that Democrats are “low information voters”, heckuva job. But for my part, I’m going to remember what Deming said:

In God we trust; all others must provide data.