The Gospel Coalition's Accommodation to Postmodernism in their Statements on Inerrancy

“[T]he TGCstatements on the face appear evangelical but the nuanced language can have more than one meaning.”

Discussion

From Bauder’s first article “Matt Recker and the Gospel Coalition”

All human organizations have faults and are liable to criticism. The Gospel Coalition is no exception. Those criticisms, however, must be thoughtful and fair, not based upon guilt-by-association or misunderstanding. Parts of Pastor Recker’s evaluation are spot on. For other evaluations, he relies upon a flawed appropriation of a 1956 article from Christian Life magazine. In yet other places he bases his evaluation upon a misunderstanding of his opponents’ position. This misunderstanding is most apparent in Pastor Recker’s remaining criticisms, particularly his criticism that The Gospel Coalition has taken a soft position on the inerrancy of Scripture. That criticism also deserves a response.

http://www.centralseminary.edu/resources/nick-of-time/matt-recker-and-t…