An Open Letter from Dr. Matt Olson of Northland International University

Dear Friends in Ministry,

Thank you for your demonstration of true friendship over these past few months. So many of you have called, emailed, and written me. Yes, God has been doing great things. Yet, when He does, the pot gets stirred. Conflict often follows.

What God has been doing among us…

I thought it would be helpful for me to share a few thoughts concerning recent events at Northland as well as our process of thought. My prayer each day is that God would give us grace to work through our present opportunities and challenges in ways that fulfill His purposes for us and that please Him most. Never has there been a more exciting day to prepare this next generation for Great Commission living or to advance kingdom causes!

January 2008: I began praying for God to do “greater things” here at Northland. It seemed to me that the church as a whole had grown cold with the works of men and was crying out for the works of God to be manifest. I prayed to that end:

  1. For God to give us vision and clarity for what He wanted at Northland.
  2. For wisdom in navigating from where we were to where we needed to be.
  3. For boldness and grace—as we knew the process would be difficult.
  4. For abundant provision.
  5. For His name alone to be magnified.

In many ways God has been answering those prayers and has blessed Northland beyond our expectations. We felt, however, that this was only the beginning.

August 15, 2010: I began a forty day journey of fasting and prayer for the works of God to be manifested and for the fulfillment of the Great Commission. I took this step of faith with some uncertainty—not really knowing how I would do or what God would do. I was certain that I was not content to coast through this final stretch of life and ministry without seeing God do something much more. I have been longing for “greater things.” Dr. Ollila, the administration, faculty, and staff joined me in this. I wish I could share all that has taken place. It has been an incredible time!

What I did not expect was the testing that would follow. Yet, now I realize this to be a familiar pattern in scripture and in history. So, we take it from the Lord and respond with strength and grace that He gives. Sometimes our motives and actions can be misunderstood and miscommunicated. I know that happens. I have always felt that the best response would be to communicate in a positive way. The following are a few points of clarification on what is happening at Northland:

1. The Way of Discipleship

We have superseded our demerit system with what we feel is a biblical model of discipleship. In reality, it is a re-commitment to a means of discipleship that has already been present at Northland. We just took away an artificial demerit system that was awkwardly laid on top of our student system of governance. Our standards and expectations remain the same. But, the way we confront and encourage is relational and the consequences practical. Quite honestly, it is a lot more work with this new way. But, it’s more biblical. And it already appears to be yielding better results. We see “The Way of Discipleship” in the spirit of Matthew 5 where Jesus “raised the bar” from the Old Testament law. We believe grace expects more—and deepens more. While we see our system as a “work in progress,” we have been very pleased with the responses of our students, faculty, and staff.

2. Our Music Philosophy

Philosophically, it is unchanged. Let me say it again…unchanged. What we have always been trying to do, and will continue to do into the future, is to make sure Northland’s practice of music (as with every aspect of the Christian life) is built principally on clear teachings from the Bible rather than on reactionary, extra-biblical reasoning that has proven to be troublingly insufficient when exported to cultures beyond American borders. We believe the Bible is sufficient to bring us to right and God-honoring positions regardless of time and culture. Even though we haven’t changed our music at a philosophical level, we are changing our music on a missional level. Where you will see changes is in our intent to expand our training to prepare students for worship and music globally. This only makes sense because, as you may have noticed, Northland International University has become more and more an international, global ministry with a passion to take the gospel where it is not proclaimed. Over 41% of the world’s population is still without a Gospel witness. This has become our students’ burden. Our Director of Fine Arts, Kevin Suiter, has recently informed us he does not believe he can take us forward in this way and thus has announced his plans to move on. We wish Kevin and Grace the best and thank them for the investments they have made here.

3. Our Guest Speakers

We invited two speakers that have generated some questions.

a. Rick Holland. Dr. Holland is the Executive Pastor at Grace Community Church in Sun Valley, California, where John MacArthur is senior pastor. Since we get many questions concerning John MacArthur and where he is in regard to fundamentalism, we decided that the best way to address this was to meet him face to face. In April of this year, Les Ollila, Doug McLachlan, Sam Horn, and I went to California and sat down with Dr. MacArthur, Rick Holland, and Phil Johnson (Executive Director of Grace to You). We had an excellent visit and found that while we did not agree on everything, we did agree on the most substantive issues of life and ministry. While we realize we function in different circles and with different constituencies, we appreciated what they were doing. I invited Rick to visit our campus to see what we were doing at Northland, meet with our Bible faculty, and speak in chapel. This was an opportunity to get to know one another and discuss significant issues of our day.

b. Bruce Ware. Dr. Ware is a professor at Southern Baptist Seminary in Louisville. He is a well-recognized teacher and author. We have invited him to teach half of an advanced-degree seminar on a specialty subject our leading pastors need to be fully versed in. Why? Because Dr. Ware has written so skillfully and authoritatively on this particular topic. This seminar is for experienced, mature pastors who are presently in ministry. We see this as appropriate in the academic context and the type of thing we have done in the past for the very same reasons. In fact, most seminaries bring adjunct professors in to address key issues that they believe helpful. Never has this been intended as a move to align with any other group.

We did not see that having these speakers would be a significant problem. Biblically, we worked through a process of decision making and felt these choices and the context in which they were made were consistent with what we have always believed. Knowing now that these decisions might be confusing, misunderstood, or miscommunicated, we would likely have planned differently. We have no desire to distract from our focus here or on the field of ministry.

We affirm that Northland stands in the historic tradition of Fundamentalism and is committed to remain as an independent, Baptist, separatist institution. We will do our best to serve the local church, which we believe is the primary institution ordained of God to carry out the Great Commission. We respect the autonomy of the local church, the priesthood of the believer, and individual soul liberty. We know that other Fundamentalists will develop different applications based on biblical authority and the principles that flow from it. We will do our best to defer to our brothers in Christ but refuse to be swayed by party politics, threats, and pressures. While deference brings unity, the fear of man paralyzes our ability to serve Christ. In the spirit of Galatians 1, we will serve Christ.

Sometimes I have to smile when I think about the politics in college ministry. Early on I found that I had to just keep it simple: do the right thing, keep a right spirit, communicate the best I can, and leave the results to God. That is all I can do. That’s what I will do. I am not disappointed with differing views and opinions or even challenges that come from healthy critics. These help me grow. What I do think needs to be confronted in our movement is the lack of biblical process in responding to one another when we have questions or disagreements.

We must keep our focus. A friend of mine shared this with me, and I found it to be a great encouragement:

Stick with your work. Do not flinch because the lion roars; do not stop to stone the devil’s dogs; do not fool away your time chasing the devil’s rabbits. Do your work. Let liars lie, let sectarians quarrel, let critics malign, let enemies accuse, let the devil do his worst; but see to it nothing hinders you from fulfilling with joy the work God has given you. He has not commanded you to be admired or esteemed. He has never bidden you to defend your character. He has not set you at work to contradict falsehood about yourself which Satan’s or God’s servants may start to peddle, or to track down every rumor that threatens your reputation. If you do these things, you will do nothing else; you will be at work for yourself and not for the Lord. Keep at your work. Let your aim be as steady as a star. You may be assaulted, wronged, insulted, slandered, wounded and rejected, misunderstood, or assigned impure motives; you may be abused by foes, forsaken by friends, and despised and rejected of men. But see to it with steadfast determination, with unfaltering zeal, that you pursue the great purpose of your life and object of your being until at last you can say, “I have finished the work which Thou gavest me to do.”

If you have further questions or comments, please feel free to write or call me. I welcome that. We have never been more excited about our future than we are now. Doc O and I believe that God is moving in a very special way and that the evidence is seen in both the abundant blessing of God and in the attacks of the Devil. We have the greatest and most exciting opportunity in the world—preparing this next generation of servant leaders for Great Commission living. Pray with us as we move boldly forward for the cause of Christ.

Your friend and fellow servant,

MO

Discussion

This whole matter may hinge on whether Matt Olson is a Sublapsarian or a Supralapsarian. If he is a Subblapsarian he is probably guilty of doing this the “Chicago way” which would involve Blago the former governor in Illinois and Rahm Emmanual who left the white house and may be a future chapel speaker somewhere. If Matt is a Supralapsarian he may be more prone to the “Detroit way.”

At any rate somewhere and sometime there may even be another post that will avoid both the Chicago way and Detroit way and deal with the issues. 8-)

[Don Johnson] I have repeatedly differentiated between separation and non-cooperation. I think we have made a mistake in using separation lingo when it comes to brethren.

But in the case of ministries that use music like the music of the Resolved Conference, I wouldn’t knowingly be in eccliesiastical partnership with them. I think they are wrong for using that style of music and I wouldn’t want the people for whom I am primarily responsible (the people of our church) to get a mixed message were I to cooperate with them. I wouldn’t want to be criticized as hypocritical for my own position on music, while tolerating theirs.
Helpful …. thanks

Wrestled with weather to add yet another post to this undying thread.

But here goes.

1. I don’t think there is ultimately much profit (hint: understatement) in speculating about weather MO should have or did anticipate much hullabaloo about the announced changes. If it were me, I’d want folks to take me at my word. So, though from my POV controversy was obvious, I’m taking MO at his word that they didn’t expect quite the response that occurred. Golden rule.

(Full disclosure. NIU did just buy an ad with us so I’m compromised and have to be nice. :D Actually I said similar things 100 posts ago… pre ad)

2. More important in my view: what kinds of changes in “locations of boundaries” ought to be made in light of changing conditions on the ground and how do we decide how to make them? KBauder’s current series is helpful. No doubt the Preserving the Truth Conference coming up will be as well.

3. When you are applying Scripture to a moving target, you have to change to stay the same. If you’re skeet shooting, keeping your focus “the same” means changing the direction and angle of your rifle barrel. This is not just true of separation issues. Applying unchanging principles to changing circumstances is like that across the board.

4. When it comes to pizza, Chicago Way is indisputably quintessential. If you think otherwise, you’re just—polite sounding British insult—daft. ;) (or maybe “barmy”)

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

The enemy is not my brother
Just curious, is anyone suggesting this? Or giving evidence of it? Surely one can disagree with Olson/NIU without suggesting that these men such as MacArthur and Holland are our enemies. I can’t help but think you are responding to someone who does not exist in terms of this conversation.

Jim Peet said:
2.The conference features music that is “worldly”…

Unproven to me: points # 1 and # 2



2.The conference features music that is not my preferred style (I don’t personally like it and I wouldn’t incorporate that style in my church)
“Worldly” has various meanings for various people. However, each person can draw their own conclusions by clicking this link:

http://www.worshipmatters.com/2010/07/02/resolved-music-and-enfield-and…

I consider a backbeat with drums etc. to be worldly. Its country music with the words of a hymn!

John Uit de Flesch

[juitdeflesch] Jim Peet said:
2.The conference features music that is “worldly”…

Unproven to me: points # 1 and # 2



2.The conference features music that is not my preferred style (I don’t personally like it and I wouldn’t incorporate that style in my church)
“Worldly” has various meanings for various people. However, each person can draw their own conclusions by clicking this link:

http://www.worshipmatters.com/2010/07/02/resolved-music-and-enfield-and…

I consider a backbeat with drums etc. to be worldly. Its country music with the words of a hymn!
Thanks for pointing me to that site. I really like the Jesus Shall Reign song!

-------
Greg Long, Ed.D. (SBTS)

Pastor of Adult Ministries
Grace Church, Des Moines, IA

Adjunct Instructor
School of Divinity
Liberty University

[juitdeflesch] I consider a backbeat with drums etc. to be worldly. Its country music with the words of a hymn!
While the style of music may not be my preference, I am not willing to concede that it i worldly!

Doing my part to not let this thread die.

1 Kings 8:60 - so that all the peoples of the earth may know that the LORD is God and that there is no other.

[juitdeflesch] Jim Peet said:
2.The conference features music that is “worldly”…

Unproven to me: points # 1 and # 2



2.The conference features music that is not my preferred style (I don’t personally like it and I wouldn’t incorporate that style in my church)
“Worldly” has various meanings for various people. However, each person can draw their own conclusions by clicking this link:

http://www.worshipmatters.com/2010/07/02/resolved-music-and-enfield-and…

I consider a backbeat with drums etc. to be worldly. Its country music with the words of a hymn!
Ouch! Anything but country! I love their version of “Lead On O King Eternal”…great stuff!

[WilliamD] I wonder that if schools like Northland get to cozy with Southern Baptist and Non-Denominational colleges - will they lose students to those schools and end up dying due to lack of enough of a fundamentalist distinction? This is what I think some might fear who disagree with Northland on this.
I wonder how badly Northland International University will miss those students who choose not to come because of NIU’s “lack of fundamentalist distinction”. I believe that there are many potential students who have been waiting for a school like NIU to stop pandering to the non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism and start functioning independently of their manipulative influences. So if a student would choose not to come because of this lack of distinction, I can’t imagine that they will be missed much.

JO

[JeremyO] I wonder how badly Northland International University will miss those students who choose not to come because of NIU’s “lack of fundamentalist distinction”. I believe that there are many potential students who have been waiting for a school like NIU to stop pandering to the non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism and start functioning independently of their manipulative influences. So if a student would choose not to come because of this lack of distinction, I can’t imagine that they will be missed much.
Do you think there aren’t plenty of choices already available to those students interested in a Christian education that doesn’t pander to the “non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism”? What is so special about Northland that such students wouldn’t already be thinking of and choosing an option like Masters College?

And do you think that Northland has been pandering to the “non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism” heretofore? Is that what you are saying?

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

Perhaps it would be healthy for just about everyone with a strong opinion on this particular thread to go back and reread Romans 14 again and meditate specifically on vs. 9-12.

About 2 years ago I preached through Romans 14 and it was very helpful to me personally to realize that many of the opinions that I readily shared with others was just my attempt at the mastery over others. Since Dr. Olsen will answer to the Master and not to me, I suppose it would be better to take a wait and see approach.

I rather doubt that any of his decisions, even the ones I disagree with, are actually harming the gospel. For those of you who know me at all…please refrain from the “you’ve matured” responses. :)

Matt

[Don Johnson]
[JeremyO] I wonder how badly Northland International University will miss those students who choose not to come because of NIU’s “lack of fundamentalist distinction”. I believe that there are many potential students who have been waiting for a school like NIU to stop pandering to the non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism and start functioning independently of their manipulative influences. So if a student would choose not to come because of this lack of distinction, I can’t imagine that they will be missed much.
Do you think there aren’t plenty of choices already available to those students interested in a Christian education that doesn’t pander to the “non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism”? What is so special about Northland that such students wouldn’t already be thinking of and choosing an option like Masters College?

And do you think that Northland has been pandering to the “non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism” heretofore? Is that what you are saying?
Let me start by conceding the point that, yes, there ARE plenty of schools out there that a student who would be considering NIU might also consider. I was not intending to set NIU up as the end all be all of christian colleges. There are very few schools, however, that have the history of patience and defference to those inside fundamentalism who choose to, out of willful ignorance and deviciveness, pursue thier political, not biblical, agendas. That is one area that, in my estimation, sets NIU apart from the other institutions(question 2 of your response) who said, “see ya later” to the extreme fundamentalists long ago. Finally, in answer to your third question, ‘And do you think that Northland has been pandering to the “non and extra-biblical wings of fundamentalism” heretofore?’, yes, I believe NIU, out of humility and defference, pandered to them. And I chose the word pandered carefully as it seems that NIU’s leadership finally decided to openly distance themselves from the extra-biblical,political agendas of those who have replaced convictions with crusades.

JO

Hey - this is the 212th post of this thread!

Happy Day! “Rejoice with they who rejoice.”

Straight Ahead!

jt

Dr. Joel Tetreau serves as Senior Pastor, Southeast Valley Bible Church (sevbc.org); Regional Coordinator for IBL West (iblministry.com), Board Member & friend for several different ministries;

[JeremyO] Let me start by conceding the point that, yes, there ARE plenty of schools out there that a student who would be considering NIU might also consider. I was not intending to set NIU up as the end all be all of christian colleges. There are very few schools, however, that have the history of patience and defference to those inside fundamentalism who choose to, out of willful ignorance and deviciveness, pursue thier political, not biblical, agendas. That is one area that, in my estimation, sets NIU apart from the other institutions(question 2 of your response) who said, “see ya later” to the extreme fundamentalists long ago.
Jeremy,

There may be some on the ‘left fringe’ of Fundamentalism who will be attracted to Northland over this change, no doubt. But do you think this will even show up on the Conservative Evangelical radar screen? Why should they consider Northland? What could their motivation possibly be when they have their own schools already?

And given the change, do you think those who on the more right wing side of fundamentalism (I don’t mean the KJO radicals, I mean people like me) will be all that enthusiastic about sending young people there? If there is some kind of middle ground between my point of view and the ‘left-ward fringe’, what will their response be?

Personally, I think that over the long term, Northland will be hurt by these decisions. Time will tell, of course, but I don’t think most fundamentalists are clamouring for this kind of change.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3