http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/09/23/senate-must-stop-obama-interne... ...the Obama administration officially published the Federal Communications Commission... net neutrality rules in the Federal Register. These rules would undo a decade of free-market, hands-off Internet policy...
http://measureofdoubt.com/2011/05/26/how-to-argue-on-the-internet/ ...debating online at least has the benefit that you can take the time to think about your wording before you comment...
Should SharperIron serve as a place for people to out other people, especially leaders?
We don’t have a “final” answer to that question. What we do have is a clear idea of what SharperIron has been about so far and what it’s about right now. It is not about victim advocacy, justice, exposing coverups or holding evil-doers accountable.
For a few months (especially the last six weeks or so), conversations have been occurring in various places on the ‘Net expressing various levels of displeasure regarding SharperIron’s failure to “publish something about x” or “say something about y” or “hold z accountable.”
We’ve had a fair amount of discussion about that, and related matters, on the moderating team. Several of us have had conversations with concerned individuals outside the team.
The time seems right to try to clarify a couple of things.
1. No website can be about everything.
Though SI has “scooped” a story a few times in it’s six-plus years, that sort of thing has been more the exception than the rule. In almost every case, if something has turned out to be “big news” after it hit SI, it would have been big news anyway, because we learned of it through some published news outlet. So making news—especially about individuals—has not been “our thing.”