Justification

Sanctification, Faith and Works: An Index of Recent Web Debate

Updated 6/13/14

Debates about various aspects of the doctrine of sanctification have been around for a long time. In the summer of 2011, a fresh round of debate on sanctification, works, faith, depravity, justification and union with Christ broke out on the Web and has continued, in one form or another up to the present.

Because the exchange has featured skilled and articulate participants, it has also been insightful. The following is offered as a tool for the benefit of anyone interested in studying the matter from the perspective of recent interactions among theologically conservative, mostly (but not entirely) Reformed leaders.

A few notes appear below, randomly. I hope to eventually annotate most of these entries more fully and fairly.

Despite the length of this list of links, it is not comprehensive. Feel free to post other links of importance in the comments.

15405 reads

“...when the Jesuit Order was founded and then employed to stop the Protestant movement, it was the doctrine of the Assurance of Salvation that was their primary target.”

"The uniform teaching of Scripture is that ordinary Christians, should be able to make their 'call and election sure,' (2 Pet. 1:10), and that not by some 'extraordinary revelation,' such as Rome taught, but merely by looking for the unmistakable and certain evidences of the work of the Spirit in their lives." - Ref21

212 reads

Reactions to antinomianism: “four of the five waves listed above offer cures that are worse than the malady.”

"...while Shepherdism, the New Perspective, the Federal Vision, and the King Jesus Gospel are emphatically wrong in polluting the doctrine of justification with human merit, their call to emphasize the obedience of faith should not go unheeded." - Mark Snoeberger

229 reads

New series at Reformation 21: "takes us back to the old perspective on Paul’s view of justification"

"...the good old doctrine of justification has been opposed for about thirty years now. Its primary contender is the New Perspective on Paul or the New Perspective on first century Judaism, whichever moniker you prefer ....advocates of the New Perspective believe that Luther and Calvin (not to mention those in their wake) committed the hermeneutical error of eisegesis." - Ref 21

485 reads

Pages