“Take a look at how President Obama’s policies help one woman over her lifetime—and how Mitt Romney would change her story.”
David Harsanyi responds to this ad at Human Events.
The Life Of Julia
Thu, 05/03/2012 - 9:23pm
Link
You might want to see another view on this story
You might want to see another view on this story. You can read it here [url ]http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/03/the-cradle-to-grave-government-supported-existence-of-julia/
Fri, 05/04/2012 - 8:38am
Link
WSJ weighs in
I saw this today, via the WSJ's http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230474370457738236084090831... Best of the Web Today :
Harsanyi is right. Obama is setting forward a vision contrary to the American tradition of self-sufficiency--a welfare state that runs from cradle to grave. And it's a dishonest vision, because it presents all of these benefits as "free," never acknowledging that they are paid for through coercive taxation.
Not to mention unsustainable levels of debt: Commentary's Alana Goodman charts the life of a now 3-year-old "Julia" and compares it with debt projections at various stages of her life: "Julie [sic ] hits a milestone around 2084, when publicly held debt will be just about 200 percent of [gross domestic product ]--and rising."
The most shocking bit of the Obama story is that Julia apparently never marries. She simply "decides" to have a baby, and Obama uses other people's money to help her take care of it. Julia doesn't appear to be poor; at various points the story refers to her glamorous career as a Web designer, and it makes no mention of her benefiting from poverty programs like Medicaid or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
In 1999 Lionel Tiger coined the word "bureaugamy" to refer to the relationship between officially impoverished mothers of illegitimate children and the government. "The Life of Julia" is an insidious attack on the institution of the family, an endorsement of bureaugamy even for middle-class women.